On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:40:39 -0600, Alan Moorman
> wrote:

>
>>You are basing your answers on vague memories like "Someone
>>was posting a survey which mentioned that 'over 140 causing
>>damage" thing'.
>
>Not vague. It was a recently posted study, perhaps in this
>very newsgroup, only a couple of days before this thread
>started.
>
>Remember it?
>
>>Catherine E. Gleason, Michael Gonzalez, Jamie S. Harmon, and R. Paul
>>Robertson. Determinants of glucose toxicity and its reversibility in
>>pancreatic islet Beta-cell line, HIT-T15. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
>>279: E997-E1002, 2000
>>
>>http://ajpendo.physiology.org/cgi/co...act/279/5/E997
>>
>
>
>Alan Moorman

We don't seem to be on the same wavelength here. Thank you
for the cite, which is an example of what people are asking
you to do - to support those statements which need support.

And of course I remember that study (I started a thread
discussing it:-) Oddly, it wasn't the one I first thought of
because of the other studies I've read on the subject - see
my initial reply to you.

Cheers, Alan, T2, Australia.
d&e, metformin 1000mg, ezetrol 10mg
Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.
--
http://loraldiabetes.blogspot.com/
http://loraltravel.blogspot.com/
latest: Epidaurus