"Emma Thackery" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> "JoeSpareBedroom" > wrote:
>
>> "Peter A" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > In article >,
>> > says...
>> >> >
>> >> > And by the way, not to be sarcastic, but you cannot read a label
>> >> > when you don't have the product. You can only read labels of
>> >> > things you have in your pantry or see at the grocery.
>> >>
>> >> Your trusted list must've mentioned only the baking version of the
>> >> product. For the other versions, there would be no logical reason
>> >> for them to contain wheat products.
>> >
>> > Now that's just plain dumb. The question is not whether there is a
>> > "logical reason" for them to contain wheat products (a meaningless
>> > idea at best) but whether they in fact do or do not contain wheat
>> > products. -- Peter Aitken
>>
>> OK. Maybe I'm the only person on earth who would not believe a
>> "trusted list" of products with gluten, which claimed that PAM
>> contained wheat. I'm the only person on earth who would look further
>> than that list. So sue me.
>
> Try taking the exorbitant amount of time to carefully read the
> ingredient lists on every single food product you want to buy (whether
> you've bought it before or not) and you'll start relying on your
> "trusted list" much more often.
Emma! Humor me for a moment and answer these two questions!
1) Consider a bottle of canola oil. On the label, it says "Canola Oil". Not
the ingredient list, but the front label. Without looking at the
ingredients, how likely is it that it contains wheat?
2) Next: Before today, did you even know there was a special version of PAM
just for baking, one which contained wheat flour?