On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 04:17:01 GMT, "Paul M. Cook"
> wrote:


>> So Paul, when a Democrat, with access to the same information as a
>> Republican, reaches the same conclusion as the Republican, only the
>> Republican lied.
>
>
>You have it all wrong. The "intelligence" itself was all a pack of lies.
>Bush lied. His lies were believed at the time and for those who were
>dubious they felt they had no choice but to take him at his word. His
>evidence was later found to be extremely dubious. His sources were found to
>be crackpots. He lied. He fabricated intelligence, cherry picked the rest
>and took still more completely out of context. The whole of Congress was
>duped. And you apparently still remain duped even in light of the truth
>having emerged.
>
>Paul
>
No Paul , two bipartisan committees determined that there was no ,
cherry picking nor lies. The findings of the two committees was bad
intelligence, not malfeasance.
And the Democratic member of the intelligence committee had access to
the same intelligence as the president.