>
> A cheap rectorial ploy? Applying a similar reference, to illuminate
> the subject.

Yes, poor rhetoric, they are not similar at all, as I pointed out.

>
> How many troops are in Afghanistan? The entire U.S. Army?
> All they are doing is look for OBL?
> 300 billion just looking for OBL?
> Quite a bit over the top, don't you think?
> Why don't' you join the military in Afghanistan and show them right
> where OBL is.
>
I don't really know what you are trying to get at, your points are a
bit jumbled. Afghanistan and and the capture of Bin Laden should have
been the focus of the administration. Opening a second front in Iraq
was a mistake clearly. Afghanistan appears to be slipping away as
well. It has been a fiasco.

>
> Where is your outrage over Clinton not taking custody of OBL when he
> had a chance.
>

Again with rhetorical ploys, I'm not talking about Clinton, I don't
know where that came from. When you find yourself in a corner, you
change the subject. I'm talking about the poorly executed foreign
policy of the Bush administration.

> There is more then a little hypocrisy in your statement.
How so?