>
> My point is that it is not that easy to find some one who is actively
> trying to avoid detection.

Is it your stance that Bin Laden is too difficult to find, that we are
incapable of doing so? I would argue that attentions (and resources)
have been redirected to deal with the deteriorating situation in Iraq,
for example the disbanding of the CIA unit in charge of hunting Bin
Laden.

> >been the focus of the administration. Opening a second front in Iraq
> >was a mistake clearly.
> In your opinion, now if you have some military expertise, you will
> have to explain that to me.
> Again your opinion.
>

Not just mine, I think you will find many people who agree that it was
a mistake to remove remove Sadam Hussein from power and sending the
country spiraling into a civil war. Worse yet, it could expand into
regional Shia/Sunnis conflict destabilizing the entire middle east.
It's not simply opinion, it is a stance arrived at by many people who
have looked at the situation.

>
> You were speaking about Bush not finding OBL, If Clinton had taken him
> (OBL), there would possibly have not been 9/11.
>

Another attempted defection...I am talking about the current
administration and how they have failed to do what they promised us
they would do, namely bring Bin Laden to justice.


> >> There is more then a little hypocrisy in your statement.
> >How so?
> The above

I'm not sure you understand what a hypocrisy is, how have I been
hypocritical?