"Omelet" > wrote in message
news
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b667a/b667a596c8a59adff3e594220ac8513a3aaf1e4e" alt="Embarrassment"
> In article >,
> "JoeSpareBedroom" > wrote:
>
>> "Omelet" > wrote in message
>> newsdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b667a/b667a596c8a59adff3e594220ac8513a3aaf1e4e" alt="Embarrassment"
>> > Who was it that mentioned something about digital imaging?
>> >
>> > Turns out that our Imaging center is state of the art.
>> >
>> > No film. :-)
>> >
>> > And it did not hurt a bit, and it only took maybe 10 minutes tops.
>> >
>> > Very pleasant experience in all.
>> >
>> > Anyone in Texas that can use this facility, I'd be happy to give a
>> > recommend!
>> > --
>> > Peace, Om
>>
>>
>> From the NPR "Talk of the Nation" show, this past Wednesday - it seems
>> that
>> computer aided mammography is more accurate with film, not digital. Very
>> interesting info. Listen to the whole thing, twice,
>> unless...well....never
>> mind.
>>
>> http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...toryId=9517846
>
> I was pleasantly surprised.
>
> This was a brand new imaging center that they built and they had not
> talked about it, so I had no idea...
> --
> Peace, Om
Well, just don't be romanced by the word "digital". As the story explain,
it's not a panacea. But, the doctor *does* have to pay for the equipment, so
the doctor has to advertise using the right words, ya know? Sort of like
tire dealers who attract customers who think nitrogen's a lot better than
regular air in the tires.