In article .com> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > writes:
> convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >
> > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...aa521e992d0f2?
>
> "After Job had prayed for his friends, the LORD made him prosperous
> again and gave him twice as much as he had before. All his brothers
> and sisters and everyone who had known him before came and ate with
> him
> in his house." (Job 42:10-11)
>
> > > > > After the test, GOD restored all that Job had lost and multiplied this
> > > > > by two.
> > > >
> > > > The kids and the servants were still dead.
>
> Incorrect.
>
> "... and everyone who had known him before..." would include his kids
> and servants.
>
> > So Job losing his children, in order that God might get a
> > couple of one-upmanship points in his aimable little
> > bet with Satan ws no tregedy?
>
> Most assuredly, without doubt, I know GOD to be kind, just, and right
> in all things.
>
> Securing the eternal defeat of satan is right and Job was rewarded
> when all that he had lost was restored to him times two. This
> included the resurrection of all who died.
So Job got all his original kids back, raised from the dead?
Untterly, completely, and entirely without Scriptural basis.
Business as usual, in other words.
>
> > Lose some kids, breed
> > some more, no big deal?
>
> Actually, lose some kids and have them brought back by GOD is a big
> deal.
>
> "GOD is GOD of the living and not the dead." -- Holy Spirit.
>
> Amen.
>
> HE resurrects.
>
> > By that "logic", the deaths of 32 college students in order
> > that GOD might expres his rage at "fags and fag-enablers"
> > wasn't a tragedy either.
>
> That would depend on what happens on GOD's day of judgment concerning
> the souls of those who have died.
The Phelps website has already answered that one for you.
You're not saying they could be WRONG on so profoundly
central a matter, are you?
-- cary