In article >, Andy <q> wrote:

> Emma Thackery said...
>
> > Arsenic In Chicken Feed May Pose Health Risks To Humans, C&EN Reports
>
> The article makes no mention of any chicken in the food supply testing
> positive for arsenic, just a feed that contains it, severely overgeneralizing
> the claim. Almost a scare tactic.

To what claim are you referring? And exactly how is it
over-generalized? On what specific wording are you basing your "scare
tactic" claim? With what do you disagree and what is your basis for
disagreement?

Emma