Emma Thackery wrote:
>
> In article >,
> Mark Thorson > wrote:
>
> > ...Precisely this question has been studied by the USDA. But you
> > choose to pretend it doesn't exist.
>
> I pretend nothing. And what an asinine contention regarding
> something I've never even seen. (Are you always this needlessly
> contentious or is it perhaps some hormone imbalance?)

Huh? When I do it, it's "asinine", but
when you do it, it's perfectly okay?
Like this example from a few days ago?

Emma Thackery wrote:
>
> Here is but one of hundreds of such expert references
> you chose to igno
>
> <http://www.sekj.org/PDF/anz42-free/anz42-091.pdf>

I didn't choose to ignore that one, I didn't even
see it. But for some reason, you felt it necessary
to insinuate that I had. Was that not "asinine"
behavior on your part?

You wouldn't be treated like a fool in this
newsgroup if you'd at least do a little more
research before posting your wild ranting and
raving. All of your recent assertions have
been easily disproven. That does not speak
well about your ability to comprehend what
you read.