In article >,
Mark Thorson > wrote:

> Emma Thackery wrote:
> >
> > In article >,
> > Mark Thorson > wrote:
> >
> > > ...Precisely this question has been studied by the USDA. But you
> > > choose to pretend it doesn't exist.
> >
> > I pretend nothing. And what an asinine contention regarding
> > something I've never even seen. (Are you always this needlessly
> > contentious or is it perhaps some hormone imbalance?)
>
> Huh? When I do it, it's "asinine", but
> when you do it, it's perfectly okay?
> Like this example from a few days ago?

Looks like you're still smarting because I proved you wrong in that
other thread too. Yes, you're the one who professed a desire to feast
on little songbirds, the killing of which is banned in the EU. <snicker>

Let's put the instant matter back in context which you so conveniently
and unscrupulously omitted:
--------------------------------------------
> Emma Thackery wrote in another thread:

> > In article >,
> > Mark Thorson > wrote in another thread:

> > > I did check my facts.
> >
> > Here is but one of hundreds of such expert references
> > you chose to igno
> >
> > <http://www.sekj.org/PDF/anz42-free/anz42-091.pdf>
--------------------------------------------------
Emma said:
> I didn't choose to ignore that one, I didn't even
> see it. But for some reason, you felt it necessary
> to insinuate that I had.

The clear difference is that, in the other thread, you *insisted* that
you checked your facts when you plainly had not. My cite was one of
scores that indicated the same information so you could not possibly
have checked your facts. OTOH in this thread, I made no such claim.
Unlike you, I'm open to factual information. I have no vested interest
in 'beliefs'; I prefer facts. The problem here is your obviously
fragile ego, your tendency to jump to erroneous conclusions, your
flagrant dishonesty, and your puerile habit of making personal attacks
when you can't deal with facts.

> Was that not "asinine" behavior on your part?

What is asinine is your belief that you could somehow pull off another
misrepresentation without me putting it back into context. Now grow up
and act like an adult, lay off the personal attacks, or you can expect
to be ignored.