On Tue, 22 May 2007 17:33:47 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
> wrote:

> wrote in message
.. .
>> On Tue, 22 May 2007 15:36:25 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
>> > wrote:
>>
> wrote in message
...
>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2007 13:35:51 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
> wrote in message
om...
>>>>>> On Mon, 21 May 2007 22:14:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Pete C." > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>>> JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "wff_ng_7" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:Gxl4i.4948$qp5.2303@trnddc03...
>>>>>>>>> > "Dimitri" > wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >> Subtle price change.
>>>>>>>>> >>
<snip>
>>
>> I'd have to know a lot more than you have told me to take a guess at
>> that; it would vary from business to business depending on various
>> overhead factors. And, again, it's irrelevant. I said a fair price; I
>> meant just that. By all means, charge what you must to make the profit
>> you need. Just don't lie to me to do it. Is that so hard to
>> understand? Are you seriously trying to argue that it's ok to try and
>> deceive consumers in order to remain profitable? If so, I'd like to
>> know exactly where =you= work; clearly, it's a business we should all
>> know about so we can avoid it.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tracy R.
>
>I don't see it as deception. Apparently, you are easily deceived.
>
>Some here are also implying that "notification" is relevant, but nobody has
>suggested a way of "notifying" customers of size changes. Perhaps they'd
>like individual letters sent to every home in America. Or, billboards.

Ok, we're going to have to agree to disagree here. You apparently have
a very different set of beliefs than I do about right and wrong. I
don't see how you can defend this practice as not being deceptive, but
whatever. I think it's obvious to the rest of us that it is, or at
least that it attempts to be. <shrug> And I notice you failed to
answer the question about where you work. <eg>

Regards,
Tracy R.