"notbob" > wrote in message
. ..
> On 2007-07-24, Paul M. Cook > wrote:
>
> > I'll say it again - it must have been a very strange contest with some
very
> > strange judges to put that incredibly mediocre wine as a winner in any
> > category other than table.
>
> Non illigitamus carborundum!
>
> I've been drinking CS wine since its intoduction. I like CS. I like
> good wines. I'm sorry, but CS chard is not a "good" wine. It's good
> for the money. It's good for cooking. It's good for a cheap drunk.
> BUT! ...it's not even on the same planet as "good" wine. Adequate.
> Decent. Better than a poke in the eye with a sharp stick! Double
> gold medal? Someone is on drugs and it ain't me. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/574e0/574e0103512ce12043eb96165930f431775c3e18" alt="Wink"
>
That's what I've been saying all along. Blake the flake just can't seem to
deal with it, though. CS is fine for the table, fine for cooking but an
award winner? Fugghedaboudit!!!
Paul