On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:18:51 GMT, "Paul M. Cook"
> wrote:

>
>"blake murphy" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:55:41 GMT, "Paul M. Cook"
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"notbob" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >> On 2007-07-24, Paul M. Cook > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > I'll say it again - it must have been a very strange contest with
>some
>> >very
>> >> > strange judges to put that incredibly mediocre wine as a winner in
>any
>> >> > category other than table.
>> >>
>> >> Non illigitamus carborundum!
>> >>
>> >> I've been drinking CS wine since its intoduction. I like CS. I like
>> >> good wines. I'm sorry, but CS chard is not a "good" wine. It's good
>> >> for the money. It's good for cooking. It's good for a cheap drunk.
>> >> BUT! ...it's not even on the same planet as "good" wine. Adequate.
>> >> Decent. Better than a poke in the eye with a sharp stick! Double
>> >> gold medal? Someone is on drugs and it ain't me.
>> >>
>> >
>> >That's what I've been saying all along. Blake the flake just can't seem
>to
>> >deal with it, though. CS is fine for the table, fine for cooking but an
>> >award winner? Fugghedaboudit!!!
>> >
>> >Paul
>> >
>>
>> i haven't been talking about wine, i've been talking about you.
>>
>> oh, and i haven't been called 'blake the flake" since around fourth
>> grade or so. as i recall, it replaced 'blake the snake' after a long
>> run amongst witty third graders.
>
>
>See, they knew it even at that young an age.
>
>Paul
>

presumably, they've learned something since then, or at least become
funnier. look to them as a guide.

your pal,
blake