View Single Post
  #19 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
Andy[_2_] Andy[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,962
Default (2007-07-31) New survey on the RFC site:

Kathleen said...

> Pete C. wrote:
>> Chatty Cathy wrote:
>>
>>>Andy wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>That's a tad neurotic! The whole survey is! I won't eat an egg if it's
>>>>rotten and that's it.
>>>
>>>Was it? Just because an egg has a "string" or a "spot" does not
>>>necessarily mean its rotten, IMNSHO.
>>>
>>>--
>>>Cheers
>>>Chatty Cathy

>>
>>
>> Correct, strings and specs have nothing whatsoever to do with an eggs
>> freshness.

>
> Well, no, of course not. The string is part of the structure of the egg
> itself. The bloody spot, otoh, indicates fertilization.


I was told the blood spot was the chicken heart. True or false?


> People are just weird sometimes. It's okay to eat eggs, it's okay to
> eat chickens, but somehow the mid-point, a fertilized egg, is icky.


Right!!! Whisk it up and scramble and nobody would be the wiser! I suppose
eggs over or sunny-side-up with a spot on it "might" lose visual appeal?!?

Andy