On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 16:01:15 GMT, (Phred)
wrote:

>In article >, PeterLucas > wrote:
(Phred) wrote in
:
>>
>>> In article >,
>>> PeterLucas > wrote:
(Phred) wrote in news:5he8ajF3ka688U3
:
>>>>
>>>>> http://swamp.com.au/(pe25j5vajuy20e55ednvj155
>>>>
>>>>Even as an Aussie, I don't see the relevence.
>>>
>>> It wasn't meant to have relevence; it was relevance. ;-)
>>
>>At this time of the morning...... BFD.
>>
>>>>And....... trim the links so that they open with the minimum of
>>>>fuss...... ie, all we have to do is click on them, rather than crop,
>>>>copy, paste.
>>>
>>>>Have you heard of www.tinyurl.com ???
>>>
>>> Yep. I use it all the time if a link is longer than a single line.
>>
>>So why didn't you use them the first time?
>
>Because the friggin' URLs weren't wrapped around when I *sent* them,
>so they weren't necessary AFAIWC.
>

angle brackets <url> usually work.

your pal,
blake