"Johnanon" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 5 Aug 2007 01:03:35 -0500, jmcquown wrote:
>
>> Omelet wrote:
>>> In article >,
>>> Johnanon > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 4 Aug 2007 21:59:19 -0500, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I posted about you? Hmmm, can't remember doing that. In fact, you
>>>>> are barely a blip on my radar these days so I can't imagine why I'd
>>>>> have posted anything recently involving you. But never mind the
>>>>> money I sent you to take your cat to the vet (and which you had put
>>>>> down, btw, rather than treated). Never mind the many things I've
>>>>> done to try to help you out. I'm obviously a very bad person.
>>>>
>>>> Looks like somebody named "Jill" is headed for complete and total
>>>> meltdown. Everybody make popcorn, grab a box of LemonHeads, pull
>>>> up a chair and be prepared to stay a spell.
>>>>
>>>> I can't believe she still has the nerve to set foot in this group
>>>> with a straight face anymore. She is completely oblivious to
>>>> everything around her.
>>>
>>> Oh lighten up!
>>> We all have our bad days...
>>>
>>> Personally, I'll cut her some slack.
>>> I like Jill.
>
> Jill _IS_ a bad day - for everyone she comes across.
>
>> Om, whoever that "Jill" was, it wasn't me.
>
> Bullshit.
>
> That is most certainly is you posting that bullshit. At this
> point it really doesn't matter what you posted last week (or last
> month) about anybody. This is YOU posting NOW.
>
> What a stinking weasel. You should be put out of yours and
> everyone else's misery. Just tuck your tail between your legs
> and leave.

Stinking weasel? I save that label for anonymous posters who troll
newsgroups and cast unsubstantiated vitriol on people they have never so
much as met. So very brave of you. Do you live with your mommy by any
chance? You act like some petty squabble between two overly emotional
females is worthy of a grand jury investigation. Get a life.

Paul