merryb wrote:
> On Aug 9, 2:00 pm, "jmcquown" > wrote:
>> merryb wrote:
>>> It's pretty clear, and makes plenty of sense, unless you're
>>> drinking!
>>
>> You don't know a damn thing about my drinking habits. It is simple
>> NETIQUETTE to quote a portion of what you are replying to, you stupid
>> newbie. That way people know what the hell you are talking
>> about/replying to. Obviously no one knows what goes on in that
>> simpering mind of yours other than having your brains pureed by a
>> post Damsel made

> Ok, I'll include everything you just said so you'll know what I'm
> responding to.

Good; that's what you're supposed to do.

I didn't feel the need to before since it was a pretty
> basic statement.

A basic statement? The subject was "getting paid to do it" Getting paid to
do WHAT?! One could surmise getting paid to strip, getting paid to screw,
getting paid to mow the lawn. You think people can read your mind???
Quoting part of the text is NETIQUETTE. Read any basic FAQ about it.

>Do you really have to be so ****ing nasty to say
> stuff to attack others? You sounded like a complete idiot in your spat
> that you are referring to which I never responded to.

Yes, I have to be nasty about it because you were nasty about me and you
don't even know me. Apparently you responded since you accused me of being
a drunk. You don't know me, so STFU with the personal comments.

OB Food: Baked cod fillets, brushed with butter infused with dried dill
weed and garlic, topped with a light sprinkling of bread crumbs with grated
parmensan cheese. I am considering german (shredded) potato pancakes to go
with, with an apple butter (this after discussing it with Christy). And
steamed broccoli as another side.

Jill