jmcquown wrote:
> merryb wrote:
>> On Aug 9, 2:00 pm, "jmcquown" > wrote:
>>> merryb wrote:
>>>> It's pretty clear, and makes plenty of sense, unless you're
>>>> drinking!
>>> You don't know a damn thing about my drinking habits. It is simple
>>> NETIQUETTE to quote a portion of what you are replying to, you stupid
>>> newbie. That way people know what the hell you are talking
>>> about/replying to. Obviously no one knows what goes on in that
>>> simpering mind of yours other than having your brains pureed by a
>>> post Damsel made
>
>> Ok, I'll include everything you just said so you'll know what I'm
>> responding to.
>
> Good; that's what you're supposed to do.
>
> I didn't feel the need to before since it was a pretty
>> basic statement.
>
> A basic statement? The subject was "getting paid to do it" Getting paid to
> do WHAT?! One could surmise getting paid to strip, getting paid to screw,
> getting paid to mow the lawn. You think people can read your mind???
> Quoting part of the text is NETIQUETTE. Read any basic FAQ about it.
>
>> Do you really have to be so ****ing nasty to say
>> stuff to attack others? You sounded like a complete idiot in your spat
>> that you are referring to which I never responded to.
>
> Yes, I have to be nasty about it because you were nasty about me and you
> don't even know me. Apparently you responded since you accused me of being
> a drunk. You don't know me, so STFU with the personal comments.
>
> OB Food: Baked cod fillets, brushed with butter infused with dried dill
> weed and garlic, topped with a light sprinkling of bread crumbs with grated
> parmensan cheese. I am considering german (shredded) potato pancakes to go
> with, with an apple butter (this after discussing it with Christy). And
> steamed broccoli as another side.
>
> Jill
>
>

You skipped the job part. I guess that's well known.