merryb wrote:
> . It is simple
>>>> NETIQUETTE to quote a portion of what you are replying to, you
>>>> stupid newbie. That way people know what the hell you are talking
>>>> about/replying to.
>
> I was replying to the post, not the title. Don't most people read
> them?
> " Getting paid to
>> do WHAT?!
>
> Cook- isn't that what he was talking about?

Did he say getting paid to COOK? No, he did not. Getting paid to "do it"
could mean anything. Quoting is Netiquette, and you are not such a newbie
that you don't know that.

>>> Do you really have to be so ****ing nasty to say
>>> stuff to attack others? .
>
Yep... when they attack me first. You have no idea how much I drink, what I
drink, when I drink. If I ask you how many books I read in a day could you
answer? Nope, you could not.

> I was referring to your statement about Crash.

Oh, do you know Crash? Do you know his real name? For that matter, do you
know Damsel? Have you ever talked with them on the phone? Hmmmmmmmmmm. I
think not.

> You seem really defensive- maybe you do have a problem. Too bad you
> have to resort to being such a bitch.

Yes, I tend to get defensive when people like you, who don't know me at all,
accuse me of things about which you know not. Too bad you still don't
understand the importance of quoting. "Getting paid to do it" doesn't
indicate anything about food, not at all.

I had a lovely dinner, thanks to helpful suggestions over the phone from
Christy (kilikini). It's funny how Damsel thinks she can speak for her.
Christy is stronger than that. And Christy got over the whole white cake
thing a long time ago. So should you.

Jill