"Elmo P. Shagnasty" > wrote

> > > I don't think the word "simultaneously" means what you think
> > > it means.
> >
> > Don't worry, he'll define it for us soon enough.
> >
> > ¬R
>
> You can't read, can you?

If he can type, one would logically assume he can read.
Not that logic is your strong point.

> Let me repeat myself for those who arrived late on the short bus:

Aside from the absurdity of buses applying to the usenet,
what good is there in repeating yourself to morons?

> > > Takes the working temperature of more than one pot?
> >
> > Simultaneously?
>
> Takes about three seconds to get two readings.
>
> As a practical matter, then, yes.

What's your definition of "simultaneous"? Does it involve
horses or something?

--oTTo--