On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 10:16:28 -0500, Ivan Marsh wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 01:04:41 +0000, Yes, THE John Henry wrote:
>> Ivan Marsh > wrote in
>> newsan.2007.08.13.19.26.28.654666 @you.now:
>>> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 01:21:51 +0000, CyberDroog wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:35:54 -0700, MobiusDick >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>fallacies. Since we are not able to recreate plowing two 747's into
>>>>>the WTC and allowing it to burn in the name of science, we cannot do
>>>>>anything other than model what would happen. The real world and
>>>>>models
>>>>
>>>> Why can't it be recreated? Find a building that needs to be
>>>> demolished anyway and a plane that has seen better years. Pack the
>>>> plane and the building full of conspiracy theorists and crash it.
>>>>
>>>> To make the YouTube video even better, they should strap Rosie
>>>> O'Donnell to the building and use her for a target.
>>>
>>> Buildings are designed to withstand being hit by aircraft... Rosie
>>> O'Donnell is another matter.
>>
>> I find it intensely interesting that there's not been one direct
>> response to my long post on this thread, particularly from the original
>> poster.
>
> I think you can assume that says something about your post.

'swonds! I'm mortally felled.

Polly wanna' cracker?