On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 03:01:39 +0000, Yes, THE John Henry wrote:

> Ivan Marsh > wrote in
> news
>> On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 01:04:41 +0000, Yes, THE John Henry wrote:
>>> Ivan Marsh > wrote in
>>> newsan.2007.08.13.19.26.28.654666 @you.now:
>>>> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 01:21:51 +0000, CyberDroog wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:35:54 -0700, MobiusDick
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>fallacies. Since we are not able to recreate plowing two 747's into
>>>>>>the WTC and allowing it to burn in the name of science, we cannot
>>>>>>do anything other than model what would happen. The real world and
>>>>>>models
>>>>>
>>>>> Why can't it be recreated? Find a building that needs to be
>>>>> demolished anyway and a plane that has seen better years. Pack the
>>>>> plane and the building full of conspiracy theorists and crash it.
>>>>>
>>>>> To make the YouTube video even better, they should strap Rosie
>>>>> O'Donnell to the building and use her for a target.
>>>>
>>>> Buildings are designed to withstand being hit by aircraft... Rosie
>>>> O'Donnell is another matter.
>>>
>>> I find it intensely interesting that there's not been one direct
>>> response to my long post on this thread, particularly from the
>>> original poster.
>>
>> I think you can assume that says something about your post.
>
> I do. I assume that it says my post was either irrefutable in general,
> or the OP couldn't think of a single point to criticize in it, even
> though I completely disagreed with him.

Do you keep your ego in the spare bedroom?