On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:38:42 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>Ms P wrote:
>>
>>
>> > Not true, Blake. Even cooler coffee would have burned this lady because
>> > she had it between her legs, and she didn't remove her pants and the hot
>> > liquid was held against her skin which helped extend the burn time on such
>> > tender skin. She was an idiot for putting a hot cup of coffee in between
>> > her legs while driving.
>>
>> Thus proving you don't know the facts. She wasn't driving. The car was
>> stopped.
>
>At least if she were driving she might an excuse for doing something as
>stupid as putting a cup of coffee between her legs. the fast of the matter
>is that she held her hot coffee between her thighs in a moving vehicle.
>That is why she was scalded. It didn't really matter if the coffee was a
>few degrees hotter that the average coffee, only that she thought she had
>prehensile thighs.

a few degress hotter? suppose she didn't like cream, so chugged it
black? yum, burned esophagus.

your pal,
blake