"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> Cindy Fuller wrote:
>> In article >,
>> "jmcquown" > wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.replacements.com/webquote/MYOCHBG.htm
>>
>> Hooboy, is that ugly. Replacements Ltd. has all sorts of kitschyness.
>> I used to enjoy going there when we lived in Greensboro and see what
>> stuff they had.
>>
>> Cindy
>
> It was from the waning era of Victorianism. Everything was gaudy back
> then.
> You can understand why I went with white with a simple lattice pattern
> around the edge. It doesn't scream at you data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/574e0/574e0103512ce12043eb96165930f431775c3e18" alt="Wink"
>
> Jill
>
I asked this the last time we were talking about patterns. There is a
similar pattern that I came across maybe 35 or so years ago. It had
something to do with the Queen - proably one of Victoria's. But even then,
AIR, even though it was available, it was for only the rich and famous'
purses. At the time I thought it one of the most beautiful patterns I'd
ever seen.
Dee Dee