"Terry Pulliam Burd" > wrote in message
>
> We do civil law (constitutional law, primarily First and Fifth
> Amendment). As clean as hands get in law.
>

Fifth Amendment? As in "I'm not talking because I can say the wrong thing
(like the truth) and get my ass in trouble?" Yeah, that's clean.


>
> And even if the price marked had been correct and the client mistook
> it for the more expensive vintage (which I don't think is the case, as
> I looked around with Google and an '89 vintage can be $200+), glomming
> onto 4 bottles still shows a sleaze factor, IMHO.

Have you called the restaurant yet? What did they say? His intentions may
have been borderline sleazy, but he may have gotten what he paird for and
the seller may be quite happy to sell at that price. Supermarkets often
have loss leaders and I take advantage of them whenever I can.

Unless we can determine that an actual error took place, it is only your
speculation that the client did wrong. Let's get that clarified