"blake murphy" > wrote in message
>>OK, I agree with that part. Especially the part where the government is
>>turning it over to developers.
>>
>
> well, i guess it's good you like *parts* of the constitution. but
> your second sentence doesn't make any sense.
>
> your pal,
> blake



It does if you know that has been done. Most recently here in CT where
condos are going in where they are tearing down people's homes. The condos
will generate more tax income so it is "for the good of the people". It
made national news so please, try to keep up.

As for "parts of the constitution" you should read the entire thread to
realize I never said I disagreed with any part of it. Context matters. It
was not the constitution I was referring to, but the law firm's practice.