On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:05:13 -0400, "Dee Dee" >
wrote:

>
>"cybercat" > wrote in message
...
>>
>> "blake murphy" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:24:42 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Bobo Bonobo®" > wrote
>>>
>>> i can't decide whether i should vote for romney's shoulders you could
>>> land a 747 on or fred thompson's smell of old english and cigar smoke.
>>>
>>
>> This sounds a little ***. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
>
>I'm wondering if the guy that was found in the restroom touching his twinkie
>toes with the cop's twinkie toes and is in big trouble -- is this illegal?
>I don't know if he was on government time, but evidently it is not a crime
>to do sexual acts on government time.
>
>But is the mere fact that he was touching toes, illegal? Or even, is it
>illegal if he was actually "doin' it"? I didn't think doing a *** thing was
>a crime.
>Does anyone know?
>Dee Dee
>

until recently, depending on the state, *** sex of any kind was
illegal (and heterosexual sodomy in many places as well). the supreme
court put an end to that in 2003:

<http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/06/26/scotus.sodomy/index.html>

sex of any kind in a public place is illegal almost everywhere. rest
rooms would fall under the definition of a 'public place.'

craig, i think, pleaded guilty to 'disorderly conduct,' in that he was
viewed as soliciting for sex in a public restroom. he says that it
was all a misunderstanding, that he merely has a 'wide stance' in a
bathroom stall (could he be a squatter?), that he dropped a piece of
paper on the floor, etc. *** or not, he seems a perfect idiot.

your pal,
blake