On Sat, 08 Sep 2007 17:30:45 -0500, Omelet >
wrote:

>In article >,
> blake murphy > wrote:
>
>> >It runs much deeper than that. The "cost per capita" is not the real
>> >problem. If only it were that easy.
>>
>> no, but the fact that we spend more per capita for poorer results
>> means our system is not 'the best.' by a long shot.
>>
>> your pal,
>> blake
>
>I don't believe that _I_ ever said it was?

you seem to have been defending it as opposed to other countries'
systems. what else could that mean?

your pal,
blake