"Dee Dee" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Omelet" > wrote in message
> news
> > In article >,
> > "Dee Dee" > wrote:
> >
> >> "Omelet" > wrote in message
> >> news > >> > We do SO not need 1984. Not that we are not getting damned close.
> >> > --
> >> > Peace, Om
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> We're heeeeeeeeeere!
> >> Dee Dee
> >
> > Not quite yet.
> >
> > Not so long as the 2nd amendment holds out.
> >
> > But, I really really really don't want to start another thread about
> > that. <g> Gets me too many killfiles from Hoplophobes. ;-)
> > --
> > Peace, Om
>
>
> OK, I'll take your word for it, Om. I feel better already ;-)
> No, I don't think another similar thread (so soon) is in order -- unless
> you darned-well feel like it!
>
> But, tell me, what is a Hoplo-phobe.

Several fine examples are currently in and/or running for office in our
gub'ment

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoplophobe