"KW" <keith_warrennospamatallteldotnet> wrote in message
...
>
> "Dee Dee" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Omelet" > wrote in message
>> news
>> > In article >,
>> > "Dee Dee" > wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Omelet" > wrote in message
>> >> news >> >> > We do SO not need 1984. Not that we are not getting damned close.
>> >> > --
>> >> > Peace, Om
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> We're heeeeeeeeeere!
>> >> Dee Dee
>> >
>> > Not quite yet.
>> >
>> > Not so long as the 2nd amendment holds out.
>> >
>> > But, I really really really don't want to start another thread about
>> > that. <g> Gets me too many killfiles from Hoplophobes. ;-)
>> > --
>> > Peace, Om
>>
>>
>> OK, I'll take your word for it, Om. I feel better already ;-)
>> No, I don't think another similar thread (so soon) is in order -- unless
>> you darned-well feel like it!
>>
>> But, tell me, what is a Hoplo-phobe.
>
> Several fine examples are currently in and/or running for office in our
> gub'ment
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoplophobe
>

Thanks.
Dee Dee