![]() |
Trivial Pursuit
It's for an English word that describes a bread that has been
preserved by toasting or heating. Naturally the bread is no longer fresh; it's hard and usable only for dunking in soups or stews or maybe used as a thickener. But the bread keeps for a long while without becoming mouldy. As I understand it the bread required no special handling, just hung in bags or sacks until it was used. |
Trivial Pursuit
stark wrote:
> It's for an English word that describes a bread that has been > preserved by toasting or heating. Naturally the bread is no longer > fresh; it's hard and usable only for dunking in soups or stews or > maybe used as a thickener. But the bread keeps for a long while > without > becoming mouldy. As I understand it the bread required no special > handling, just hung > in bags or sacks until it was used. > Hardtack? |
Trivial Pursuit
On Oct 31, 9:50 pm, Dave Bell > wrote:
> stark wrote: > > It's for an English word that describes a bread that has been > > preserved by toasting or heating. Naturally the bread is no longer > > fresh; it's hard and usable only for dunking in soups or stews or > > maybe used as a thickener. But the bread keeps for a long while > > without > > becoming mouldy. As I understand it the bread required no special > > handling, just hung > > in bags or sacks until it was used. > > Hardtack? Could be. There's something called rusk and there's zweibach, but I was thinking there's a specific name for bread in whole loaf preservation. There's a small treatise on reconstituting stale bread in The Bread Book dtd 1640 which instructs one to dip the loaf in cold water then heat in a gentle oven, claiming that the bread tastes almost fresh. |
Trivial Pursuit
On Nov 1, 3:30 pm, the pilgrim > wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 02:50:07 GMT, Dave Bell > wrote: > >stark wrote: > >> It's for an English word that describes a bread that has been > >> preserved by toasting or heating. Naturally the bread is no longer > >> fresh; it's hard and usable only for dunking in soups or stews or > >> maybe used as a thickener. But the bread keeps for a long while > >> without > >> becoming mouldy. As I understand it the bread required no special > >> handling, just hung > >> in bags or sacks until it was used. > > >Hardtack? > > Seabiscuit? Nah, he quit racing decades ago. |
Trivial Pursuit
In article .com>,
stark > wrote: > It's for an English word that describes a bread that has been > preserved by toasting or heating. Naturally the bread is no longer > fresh; it's hard and usable only for dunking in soups or stews or > maybe used as a thickener. But the bread keeps for a long while > without > becoming mouldy. As I understand it the bread required no special > handling, just hung > in bags or sacks until it was used. Sounds like a rusk to me. -- -Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ Notes about our meals in Tuscany have been posted to http://www.jamlady.eboard.com; 10-16-2007 |
Trivial Pursuit
On Nov 19, 5:48 pm, Melba's Jammin' >
wrote: > In article .com>, > > stark > wrote: > > It's for an English word that describes a bread that has been > > preserved by toasting or heating. Naturally the bread is no longer > > fresh; it's hard and usable only for dunking in soups or stews or > > maybe used as a thickener. But the bread keeps for a long while > > without > > becoming mouldy. As I understand it the bread required no special > > handling, just hung > > in bags or sacks until it was used. > > Sounds like a rusk to me. > -- > -Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ That may be it, or the closest I'm gonna get. I remember it as Holland rusk but English accepts all comers. Thanks. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:10 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter