A person asked in another NG about baking butter cakes in foil pans to
take to her husband's office party so she wouldn't have to drag her good
pryex pans home.

I have never bake anything in these and am wondering how good they do
baking and be concern with burning because of the lightness of the pans.

Thank You

ms. tonya wrote:
> A person asked in another NG about baking butter cakes in foil pans to
> take to her husband's office party so she wouldn't have to drag her good
> pryex pans home.
>
> I have never bake anything in these and am wondering how good they do
> baking and be concern with burning because of the lightness of the pans.
>
> Thank You

Actually the foil reflects much of the heat away from the pan so cakes
actually come out with a lighter crust.

(ms. tonya) wrote:

>A person asked in another NG about baking butter cakes in foil pans to
>take to her husband's office party so she wouldn't have to drag her good
>pryex pans home.
>
>I have never bake anything in these and am wondering how good they do
>baking and be concern with burning because of the lightness of the pans.

Once you get the pan into the oven, it will bake just fine. If you're
using a large pan, you may need to use a peel to get the pan into the
oven (sometimes the larger pans will buckle from the weight of the
batter). I use them fairly often. You may want to check for doneness
5 minutes before you usually do, especially if you usually bake in
Pyrex. The lighter weight pans heat up more quickly than the Pyrex.

I don't suggest using the foil pans for roasting a bird, unless you
put a cookie sheet underneath it to keep it from buckling and dumping
pan drippings all over.

jenn
--
Jenn Ridley :

wrote:
> ms. tonya wrote:
>
>>A person asked in another NG about baking butter cakes in foil pans to
>>take to her husband's office party so she wouldn't have to drag her good
>>pryex pans home.
>>
>>I have never bake anything in these and am wondering how good they do
>>baking and be concern with burning because of the lightness of the pans.
>>
>>Thank You
>
>
> Actually the foil reflects much of the heat away from the pan so cakes
> actually come out with a lighter crust.

Sorry. Foil reflects light, not heat. It's aluminum, same as pots and
pans. They aren't ever described as reflecting heat. Because they don't.

Nice shiny copper skillets don't reflect heat. Polished stainless,
sandwiched, bake sheets don't reflect heat. They can reflect a small
percentage of visible, radiant heat like from a glowing-element heater
situated in front of a highly polished reflective curved surface. But
that's not what's at work in an oven.

Pastorio

Bob (this one) wrote:
> wrote:
> > ms. tonya wrote:
> >
> >>A person asked in another NG about baking butter cakes in foil pans to
> >>take to her husband's office party so she wouldn't have to drag her good
> >>pryex pans home.
> >>
> >>I have never bake anything in these and am wondering how good they do
> >>baking and be concern with burning because of the lightness of the pans.
> >>
> >>Thank You
> >
> >
> > Actually the foil reflects much of the heat away from the pan so cakes
> > actually come out with a lighter crust.
>
> Sorry. Foil reflects light, not heat. It's aluminum, same as pots and
> pans. They aren't ever described as reflecting heat. Because they don't.
>
> Nice shiny copper skillets don't reflect heat. Polished stainless,
> sandwiched, bake sheets don't reflect heat. They can reflect a small
> percentage of visible, radiant heat like from a glowing-element heater
> situated in front of a highly polished reflective curved surface. But
> that's not what's at work in an oven.
>

LOL!! I once had a roommate who would get so insistent that, when
using aluminum foil over a casserole, I should always put the shiny
side down, or otherwise the heat would be reflected away. I said, "I'm
not cooking from the lightbulb in the oven."

Of course, this was the same person who would never set the timer on
the microwave. - just hit "9999" and then stand there watching the
wall clock.

Then, I suppose that water should always be boiled slowly, not fast,
so it doesn't get that burnt taste.

Bob (this one) wrote:
> Sorry. Foil reflects light, not heat. It's aluminum, same as pots and
> pans. They aren't ever described as reflecting heat. Because they don't.


It also reflects heat.

Bob (this one) wrote:
> Sorry. Foil reflects light, not heat. It's aluminum, same as pots and
> pans. They aren't ever described as reflecting heat. Because they don't.

It also reflects heat.

OK. How does the shiny side of foil reflect heat? Any different than
the glass or corning ware pan, or the pot on the stove, or the baking
dish? Explain yourself.

wrote:
> wrote:
>
>>OK. How does the shiny side of foil reflect heat? Any different than
>>the glass or corning ware pan, or the pot on the stove, or the baking
>>dish? Explain yourself.
>
> I don't have to because I know I'm right.

You may go now. And please take your misinformation with you.

I offered a rationale for disagreeing with your erroneous statement. You
say, "I know I'm right" with no further comment. Guess who's position
makes more sense and is more logical?

Pastorio

wrote:

> Then, I suppose that water should always be boiled slowly, not fast,
> so it doesn't get that burnt taste.

I once had a rookie cook in one of my restaurants who I saw stirring a
pot of water that was on to boil. I asked him why he did that and he
said, "It helps it to boil faster when you stir the cold water on top
down to the bottom."

He didn't make it in my operation.

Pastorio

Bob (this one) wrote:
> wrote:
> > wrote:
> >
> >>OK. How does the shiny side of foil reflect heat? Any different than
> >>the glass or corning ware pan, or the pot on the stove, or the baking
> >>dish? Explain yourself.
> >
> > I don't have to because I know I'm right.
>
> You may go now. And please take your misinformation with you.
>
> I offered a rationale for disagreeing with your erroneous statement. You
> say, "I know I'm right" with no further comment. Guess who's position
> makes more sense and is more logical?
>
> Pastorio

Do a Google search using the terms foil pans reflect heat.

wrote:
> Bob (this one) wrote:
>
wrote:
>>
wrote:
>>>
>>>>OK. How does the shiny side of foil reflect heat? Any different than
>>>>the glass or corning ware pan, or the pot on the stove, or the baking
>>>>dish? Explain yourself.
>>>
>>>I don't have to because I know I'm right.
>>
>>You may go now. And please take your misinformation with you.
>>
>>I offered a rationale for disagreeing with your erroneous statement. You
>>say, "I know I'm right" with no further comment. Guess who's position
>>makes more sense and is more logical?
>>
>>Pastorio
>
> Do a Google search using the terms foil pans reflect heat.

I did as you suggested. *All* the hits were from non-scientific sites,
with the words sounding like they were written by the same person. You
need to evaluate the sources of your information better than you did.
None were authoritative, and merely parroted each other.

Now look at the technical sites...

"If metal is a conductor of heat, why is it that aluminum foil will
insulate food and reflect heat?
"Aluminum may be a good conductor of heat, but its a terrible
emitter or absorber of thermal radiation. When you wrap food in aluminum
foil, you dramatically reduce that food's ability to lose heat via
radiation if it's hotter than its surroundings or its ability to gain
heat via radiation if it's colder than its surroundings. Aluminum foil
doesn't have much effect on heat transferred to or from the food via
conduction or convection because aluminum itself is a good conductor of
heat." <http://rabi.phys.virginia.edu/HTW/clothing_and_insulation.html>

"...terrible emitter or absorber of thermal radiation" means that it
doesn't reflect it, it simply doesn't absorb it. It doesn't make it go
back where it came from, nor does it capture it.

See that "good conductor of heat" thing? Not "reflector" of heat.

Here's another one:
"2.132 Reflect radiant heat waves
Heat tissue paper with a magnifying glass, as in 2.131. Note the
distance from the reading glass to the tissue paper. Put a tilted mirror
half way between the lens and the paper. Feel with your hand above the
mirror until you find the point where the heat waves are focussed. Hold
a piece of paper tissue at this point. The paper ignites."

That wouldn't happen in the dark. Light is radiant heat. It reflects
light. It doesn't reflect heat as heat, it just doesn't absorb radiant
energy well, nor does it transmit it. You say it reflects heat, so I'm
sure you'd closely wrap your hand in a single layer of foil and hold a
candle under it such that the flame was 1/2 inch below it. It'll reflect
the radiant heat (we call that light) but the conducted heat and
convected heat will fricassee your hand. That's why aluminum cookware
works well. It conducts heat very well; it doesn't reflect it back
towards the flame or the coil.

"23.00 Heat & temperature, internal energy & heat, heat and the first
law of thermodynamics
Heat is a form of energy measured in Joule. The first law of
thermodynamics states when other forms of energy are converted to heat,
or when heat is converted to other forms of energy, there is no loss of
total energy. The second law of thermodynamics states heat always flows
from hot bodies to cold bodies. "
<http://www.uq.edu.au/_School_Science_Lessons/UNPh23.html>

Note that aluminum is right behind gold and copper in its capacity to
conduct heat (the last column of the chart). Silver isn't mentioned, but
it's at the top of the list.
<http://www.ee.byu.edu/cleanroom/thermal_properties.phtml>

"Clearly in selecting a conductor these are very significant differences
- so the best materials are those which lie low towards the bottom of
the metals bubble, such as copper and aluminium. Gold is excellent, but
it is so expensive it is way off the scale of the chart. Even so, it is
used for electrical contacts in microcircuits.

"Finally, thermal conductivity and electrical conductivity are closely
related - as the underlying physics is similar. The electrical
resistivity chart also gives an indication of thermal properties - with
thermal insulators towards the top (polymers and foams, and ceramics)
and the good thermal conductors - metals - at the bottom."
<http://www-materials.eng.cam.ac.uk/mpsite/physics/introduction/default.html>

This means that heat and electricity are treated similarly by metals.
Aluminum is a good conductor of electricity, so it's also a good
conductor of heat. As nothing reflects electricity, nothing reflects
heat, either.

You might want to consider why there are charts for conduction of heat,
but none for reflection of heat.

This whole issue reminds me of that silly device with a hemispherical
mirror (like a bowl) into which you were supposed to put ice to reflect
the cold upwards and chill things in a small basket at the mouth of the
bowl. It was a physical impossibility.

Now you go find out what "heat" is and is not. And learn the difference
between radiant heat and conducted or convected heat is. And don't go to
cooking hobbyist sites for lessons in physics.

Pastorio

Bob (this one) wrote:
s foil pans reflect heat.
>
> I did as you suggested. *All* the hits were from non-scientific sites,
> with the words sounding like they were written by the same person. You
> need to evaluate the sources of your information better than you did.
> None were authoritative, and merely parroted each other.
>
> Now look at the technical sites...
>
> "If metal is a conductor of heat, why is it that aluminum foil will
> insulate food and reflect heat?
> "Aluminum may be a good conductor of heat, but its a terrible
> emitter or absorber of thermal radiation. When you wrap food in aluminum
> foil, you dramatically reduce that food's ability to lose heat via
> radiation if it's hotter than its surroundings or its ability to gain
> heat via radiation if it's colder than its surroundings. Aluminum foil
> doesn't have much effect on heat transferred to or from the food via
> conduction or convection because aluminum itself is a good conductor of
> heat." <http://rabi.phys.virginia.edu/HTW/clothing_and_insulation.html>
>
> "...terrible emitter or absorber of thermal radiation" means that it
> doesn't reflect it, it simply doesn't absorb it. It doesn't make it go
> back where it came from, nor does it capture it.
>
> See that "good conductor of heat" thing? Not "reflector" of heat.
>
> Here's another one:
> "2.132 Reflect radiant heat waves
> Heat tissue paper with a magnifying glass, as in 2.131. Note the
> distance from the reading glass to the tissue paper. Put a tilted mirror
> half way between the lens and the paper. Feel with your hand above the
> mirror until you find the point where the heat waves are focussed. Hold
> a piece of paper tissue at this point. The paper ignites."
>
> That wouldn't happen in the dark. Light is radiant heat. It reflects
> light. It doesn't reflect heat as heat, it just doesn't absorb radiant
> energy well, nor does it transmit it. You say it reflects heat, so I'm
> sure you'd closely wrap your hand in a single layer of foil and hold a
> candle under it such that the flame was 1/2 inch below it. It'll reflect
> the radiant heat (we call that light) but the conducted heat and
> convected heat will fricassee your hand. That's why aluminum cookware
> works well. It conducts heat very well; it doesn't reflect it back
> towards the flame or the coil.
>
> "23.00 Heat & temperature, internal energy & heat, heat and the first
> law of thermodynamics
> Heat is a form of energy measured in Joule. The first law of
> thermodynamics states when other forms of energy are converted to heat,
> or when heat is converted to other forms of energy, there is no loss of
> total energy. The second law of thermodynamics states heat always flows
> from hot bodies to cold bodies. "
> <http://www.uq.edu.au/_School_Science_Lessons/UNPh23.html>
>
> Note that aluminum is right behind gold and copper in its capacity to
> conduct heat (the last column of the chart). Silver isn't mentioned, but
> it's at the top of the list.
> <http://www.ee.byu.edu/cleanroom/thermal_properties.phtml>
>
> "Clearly in selecting a conductor these are very significant differences
> - so the best materials are those which lie low towards the bottom of
> the metals bubble, such as copper and aluminium. Gold is excellent, but
> it is so expensive it is way off the scale of the chart. Even so, it is
> used for electrical contacts in microcircuits.
>
> "Finally, thermal conductivity and electrical conductivity are closely
> related - as the underlying physics is similar. The electrical
> resistivity chart also gives an indication of thermal properties - with
> thermal insulators towards the top (polymers and foams, and ceramics)
> and the good thermal conductors - metals - at the bottom."
> <http://www-materials.eng.cam.ac.uk/mpsite/physics/introduction/default.html>
>
> This means that heat and electricity are treated similarly by metals.
> Aluminum is a good conductor of electricity, so it's also a good
> conductor of heat. As nothing reflects electricity, nothing reflects
> heat, either.
>
> You might want to consider why there are charts for conduction of heat,
> but none for reflection of heat.
>
> This whole issue reminds me of that silly device with a hemispherical
> mirror (like a bowl) into which you were supposed to put ice to reflect
> the cold upwards and chill things in a small basket at the mouth of the
> bowl. It was a physical impossibility.
>
> Now you go find out what "heat" is and is not. And learn the difference
> between radiant heat and conducted or convected heat is. And don't go to
> cooking hobbyist sites for lessons in physics.
>
> Pastorio

You can quote as much so called scientific proof as much as you want
but I know from experience that shiny aluminum baking pans reflect
heat. Besides, there's a big difference between the way a pan heats up
on a stove and the way a pan heats up in an oven. A pan on a stove
heats up entirely by conduction. A pan in an oven heats up by means of
radiation and indirect conduction, that is the oven's heat source heats
the air inside the oven and the heat from the air is conducted into the
pan. Since light colored materials reflect radiant energy, part of the
radiant heat inside the oven is reflected away from the pan.

wrote:
> Bob (this one) wrote:
> s foil pans reflect heat.
>
>>I did as you suggested. *All* the hits were from non-scientific sites,
>>with the words sounding like they were written by the same person. You
>>need to evaluate the sources of your information better than you did.
>>None were authoritative, and merely parroted each other.
>>
>>Now look at the technical sites...
>>
>>"If metal is a conductor of heat, why is it that aluminum foil will
>>insulate food and reflect heat?
>> "Aluminum may be a good conductor of heat, but its a terrible
>>emitter or absorber of thermal radiation. When you wrap food in aluminum
>>foil, you dramatically reduce that food's ability to lose heat via
>>radiation if it's hotter than its surroundings or its ability to gain
>>heat via radiation if it's colder than its surroundings. Aluminum foil
>>doesn't have much effect on heat transferred to or from the food via
>>conduction or convection because aluminum itself is a good conductor of
>>heat." <http://rabi.phys.virginia.edu/HTW/clothing_and_insulation.html>
>>
>>"...terrible emitter or absorber of thermal radiation" means that it
>>doesn't reflect it, it simply doesn't absorb it. It doesn't make it go
>>back where it came from, nor does it capture it.
>>
>>See that "good conductor of heat" thing? Not "reflector" of heat.
>>
>>Here's another one:
>>"2.132 Reflect radiant heat waves
>>Heat tissue paper with a magnifying glass, as in 2.131. Note the
>>distance from the reading glass to the tissue paper. Put a tilted mirror
>>half way between the lens and the paper. Feel with your hand above the
>>mirror until you find the point where the heat waves are focussed. Hold
>>a piece of paper tissue at this point. The paper ignites."
>>
>>That wouldn't happen in the dark. Light is radiant heat. It reflects
>>light. It doesn't reflect heat as heat, it just doesn't absorb radiant
>>energy well, nor does it transmit it. You say it reflects heat, so I'm
>>sure you'd closely wrap your hand in a single layer of foil and hold a
>>candle under it such that the flame was 1/2 inch below it. It'll reflect
>>the radiant heat (we call that light) but the conducted heat and
>>convected heat will fricassee your hand. That's why aluminum cookware
>>works well. It conducts heat very well; it doesn't reflect it back
>>towards the flame or the coil.
>>
>>"23.00 Heat & temperature, internal energy & heat, heat and the first
>>law of thermodynamics
>>Heat is a form of energy measured in Joule. The first law of
>>thermodynamics states when other forms of energy are converted to heat,
>>or when heat is converted to other forms of energy, there is no loss of
>>total energy. The second law of thermodynamics states heat always flows
>>from hot bodies to cold bodies. "
>><http://www.uq.edu.au/_School_Science_Lessons/UNPh23.html>
>>
>>Note that aluminum is right behind gold and copper in its capacity to
>>conduct heat (the last column of the chart). Silver isn't mentioned, but
>>it's at the top of the list.
>><http://www.ee.byu.edu/cleanroom/thermal_properties.phtml>
>>
>>"Clearly in selecting a conductor these are very significant differences
>>- so the best materials are those which lie low towards the bottom of
>>the metals bubble, such as copper and aluminium. Gold is excellent, but
>>it is so expensive it is way off the scale of the chart. Even so, it is
>>used for electrical contacts in microcircuits.
>>
>>"Finally, thermal conductivity and electrical conductivity are closely
>>related - as the underlying physics is similar. The electrical
>>resistivity chart also gives an indication of thermal properties - with
>>thermal insulators towards the top (polymers and foams, and ceramics)
>>and the good thermal conductors - metals - at the bottom."
>><http://www-materials.eng.cam.ac.uk/mpsite/physics/introduction/default.html>
>>
>>This means that heat and electricity are treated similarly by metals.
>>Aluminum is a good conductor of electricity, so it's also a good
>>conductor of heat. As nothing reflects electricity, nothing reflects
>>heat, either.
>>
>>You might want to consider why there are charts for conduction of heat,
>>but none for reflection of heat.
>>
>>This whole issue reminds me of that silly device with a hemispherical
>>mirror (like a bowl) into which you were supposed to put ice to reflect
>>the cold upwards and chill things in a small basket at the mouth of the
>>bowl. It was a physical impossibility.
>>
>>Now you go find out what "heat" is and is not. And learn the difference
>>between radiant heat and conducted or convected heat is. And don't go to
>>cooking hobbyist sites for lessons in physics.
>>
>>Pastorio
>
>
> You can quote as much so called

Hey, moron. This kind of sneering dismissal of researched and documented
information marks you for an ignorant fool. When there's data from
several reliable sources and you say, "Oh, no, I know better," you end
up looking like a blowhole driven by ego and the obviously mistaken
belief that it's correct just because you believe it.

> scientific proof

Yes. Scientific proof. As opposed to your confused ramblings that show
you have no idea about heat, its movement and reflectivity.

> as much as you want
> but I know from experience that shiny aluminum baking pans reflect
> heat.

So you say. And you *know* it's reflecting heat rather than simply not
transmitting it. What a wonderful thermal effects laboratory you must have.

<LOL> You *know* what's happening, and then you offer the stuff below as
"proof." Hilarious.

> Besides, there's a big difference between the way a pan heats up
> on a stove and the way a pan heats up in an oven. A pan on a stove
> heats up entirely by conduction.

So the red glow from the electric coil isn't radiant heat. And the very
visible gas flame isn't radiant heat. Got it. I bet your physics teacher
is proud of you.

I bet that's why you're perfectly happy to hold your hand right next to
the pan while it cooks. No radiant heat means none released to the air,
right?

> A pan in an oven heats up by means of
> radiation and indirect conduction, that is the oven's heat source heats
> the air inside the oven and the heat from the air is conducted into the
> pan.

There's no such thing as "indirect conduction." Heat is either conducted
or it isn't. There's a grand total of three ways for heat to move -
radiation, conduction, convection. There's no "indirect" way for heat to
move.

> Since light colored materials reflect radiant energy,

Um, *visible* radiant energy and infra-red. The energy radiating from
hot oven walls isn't visible; too far down on the electromagnetic
spectrum (You do know what that is, right?). That light-colored business
refers to "albedo." And you need to learn the difference between
"shiny" and "light-colored."

> part of the
> radiant heat inside the oven is reflected away from the pan.

You didn't read anything from those science sites at all, did you...?

Like it says above: "You might want to consider why there are charts for
conduction of heat, but none for reflection of heat."

We're done with this. You haven't the remotest idea what you're talking
about. The very simple fact is that you're wrong. The next fact is that
you aren't interested in learning. You're over your head with this subject.

For future reference, one person's anecdotal experience is *never* proof
of an assertion. Not yours, not mine.

Pastorio

Bob (this one) wrote:

<Garbage snipped>

PLONK

You just can't admit that you're wrong.

Don't bother posting a reply because you've been killfiled.

wrote:
> Bob (this one) wrote:
>
> <Garbage snipped>
>
> PLONK
>
> You just can't admit that you're wrong.
>
> Don't bother posting a reply because you've been killfiled.

<LOL> This boner posted in rec.food.cooking that this thread was a war
of words and invited people to come see it.

War of words, indeed...

Words like "Ouch" and "bye bye..."

Pastorio

https://www.quora.com/Aluminium-is-o...acking-edibles

I was curious about this too because on one hand the NASA uses aluminum foil to protect the satellites in space from the heat of the sun.

On the other hand you can put aluminum foil into your cake and make your cake bake faster.

So it seems like a contradiction.

But what it is is that aluminum foil is both a really good absorber of heat but also a very good Emitter of heat.

Its not that it reflects heat it actually absorbs it but it also emits it very well and its also cheap and its found in many places.

So the aluminum foil will absorb the heat but then it will quickly Emit it back out so in the universe the aluminum foil on the satellites are absorbing the suns heat but then it will Emit The heat into the universe and keep in the satellite cool

but when you use aluminum foil in your cake the heat has been absorbed into the aluminum foil and then it will let go of that heat into your cake so your cake can be thought of as the universe except this is a limited portion and so of course the heat warms up the cake .

In the universe of just dissipates.

On 01/04/2019 18:16, wrote:
> https://www.quora.com/Aluminium-is-o...acking-edibles

*plonk*