Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Barbecue (alt.food.barbecue) Discuss barbecue and grilling--southern style "low and slow" smoking of ribs, shoulders and briskets, as well as direct heat grilling of everything from burgers to salmon to vegetables. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not a cook by any means, but I do a little welding so I built a
smoker 'cause it seemed like the thing to do. I have a thermometer at the deck level (level the food is sitting on) and I've used this thing several times with no problem. Tonight I thought I'd try pork spare ribs and do them differently than in the past. In the past I cook them 30 minutes unwrapped to get the smoke flavor (all this is over split, old post oak (I think it's Post Oak, it's the stuff we have like heat in north central Texas)) then wrap them up in aluminum foil for another 2 and half hours, all of it at 300 degrees F. They turn out done and tender but not like what I see at competitions. Tonight I tried them at 200-225 for 5 hours unwrapped then wrapped for an hour at about 300. When I cut into them, even the end-most rib bone, the juices appeared pink/red. Is that really the blood color or is that some other effect I'm seeing? I was afraid to eat them and wrapped them back up and have them sitting on the smoker at about 225 and will leave them there all night, for as long as the fire burns, because it's time for bed and I can't stay up all night checking them. My big concern is that I was taught to look for "clear" juices and these appeared pink even after a total of FIVE hours at approximately 200-225 degrees or so and then an hour at almost 300 degrees. Anyway, I'd appreciate any thoughts or knowledge on this. Thank you. --HC |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "HC" > wrote in message ups.com... > I'm not a cook by any means, but I do a little welding so I built a > smoker 'cause it seemed like the thing to do. I have a thermometer at > the deck level (level the food is sitting on) and I've used this thing > several times with no problem. Tonight I thought I'd try pork spare > ribs and do them differently than in the past. In the past I cook > them 30 minutes unwrapped to get the smoke flavor (all this is over > split, old post oak (I think it's Post Oak, it's the stuff we have > like heat in north central Texas)) then wrap them up in aluminum foil > for another 2 and half hours, all of it at 300 degrees F. They turn > out done and tender but not like what I see at competitions. > > Tonight I tried them at 200-225 for 5 hours unwrapped then wrapped for > an hour at about 300. When I cut into them, even the end-most rib > bone, the juices appeared pink/red. Is that really the blood color or > is that some other effect I'm seeing? I was afraid to eat them and > wrapped them back up and have them sitting on the smoker at about 225 > and will leave them there all night, for as long as the fire burns, > because it's time for bed and I can't stay up all night checking them. > > My big concern is that I was taught to look for "clear" juices and > these appeared pink even after a total of FIVE hours at approximately > 200-225 degrees or so and then an hour at almost 300 degrees. > > Anyway, I'd appreciate any thoughts or knowledge on this. Thank you. > > --HC > "Meat Juice" can certainly be red. Did the meat fall readily away from the rib bone? Was the fat mostly rendered? When I have a question like this, I usually stick a meat thermometer somewhere[hard to find a place with ribs] and if the temp. is 150+ I eat it. Kent |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 9, 12:56 am, HC > wrote:
> I'm not a cook by any means, but I do a little welding so I built a > smoker 'cause it seemed like the thing to do. I have a thermometer at > the deck level (level the food is sitting on) and I've used this thing > several times with no problem. Tonight I thought I'd try pork spare > ribs and do them differently than in the past. In the past I cook > them 30 minutes unwrapped to get the smoke flavor (all this is over > split, old post oak (I think it's Post Oak, it's the stuff we have > like heat in north central Texas)) then wrap them up in aluminum foil > for another 2 and half hours, all of it at 300 degrees F. They turn > out done and tender but not like what I see at competitions. > > Tonight I tried them at 200-225 for 5 hours unwrapped then wrapped for > an hour at about 300. When I cut into them, even the end-most rib > bone, the juices appeared pink/red. Is that really the blood color or > is that some other effect I'm seeing? I was afraid to eat them and > wrapped them back up and have them sitting on the smoker at about 225 > and will leave them there all night, for as long as the fire burns, > because it's time for bed and I can't stay up all night checking them. > > My big concern is that I was taught to look for "clear" juices and > these appeared pink even after a total of FIVE hours at approximately > 200-225 degrees or so and then an hour at almost 300 degrees. > > Anyway, I'd appreciate any thoughts or knowledge on this. Thank you. > > --HC If you go to Kamado.com to their forums, recipes, and look for the 1-2-3 method, that is what hubby uses. I know the first hour is uncovered, and think the next 2 are in foil, then 3 sealed tightly wrapped up in towels in a cooler to sweat/tenderize, but check it to be sure. Loads of recipes there that will work on any cooker in which you can control the temp. I can't imagine how those ribs could NOT have been done after that much time cooking esp on 300. Good Luck. Nanzi |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 9, 8:26 am, Olde Hippee > wrote:
> On Aug 9, 12:56 am, HC > wrote: > > > > > > > I'm not a cook by any means, but I do a little welding so I built a > > smoker 'cause it seemed like the thing to do. I have a thermometer at > > the deck level (level the food is sitting on) and I've used this thing > > several times with no problem. Tonight I thought I'd try pork spare > > ribs and do them differently than in the past. In the past I cook > > them 30 minutes unwrapped to get the smoke flavor (all this is over > > split, old post oak (I think it's Post Oak, it's the stuff we have > > like heat in north central Texas)) then wrap them up in aluminum foil > > for another 2 and half hours, all of it at 300 degrees F. They turn > > out done and tender but not like what I see at competitions. > > > Tonight I tried them at 200-225 for 5 hours unwrapped then wrapped for > > an hour at about 300. When I cut into them, even the end-most rib > > bone, the juices appeared pink/red. Is that really the blood color or > > is that some other effect I'm seeing? I was afraid to eat them and > > wrapped them back up and have them sitting on the smoker at about 225 > > and will leave them there all night, for as long as the fire burns, > > because it's time for bed and I can't stay up all night checking them. > > > My big concern is that I was taught to look for "clear" juices and > > these appeared pink even after a total of FIVE hours at approximately > > 200-225 degrees or so and then an hour at almost 300 degrees. > > > Anyway, I'd appreciate any thoughts or knowledge on this. Thank you. > > > --HC > > If you go to Kamado.com to their forums, recipes, and look for the > 1-2-3 method, that is what hubby uses. I know the first hour is > uncovered, and think the next 2 are in foil, then 3 sealed tightly > wrapped up in towels in a cooler to sweat/tenderize, but check it to > be sure. Loads of recipes there that will work on any cooker in which > you can control the temp. > I can't imagine how those ribs could NOT have been done after that > much time cooking esp on 300. Good Luck. Nanzi- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - ??? Cooking the ribs in foil???? Why steam the ribs? I suggest forgoing the foil, cooking at about 250 for 5 or so hours till the meat pulls back and shows about 1/2" of bone or so or when picked up in the middle it cracks/breaks. Any red you'll see won't look anything like raw meat, that's for sure. |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tutall wrote:
> On Aug 9, 8:26 am, Olde Hippee > wrote: >> On Aug 9, 12:56 am, HC > wrote: >> I can't imagine how those ribs could NOT have been done after that >> much time cooking esp on 300. Good Luck. Nanzi- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > ??? Cooking the ribs in foil???? Why steam the ribs? > > I suggest forgoing the foil, cooking at about 250 for 5 or so hours > till the meat pulls back and shows about 1/2" of bone or so or when > picked up in the middle it cracks/breaks. Any red you'll see won't > look anything like raw meat, that's for sure. > When I cook ribs, I use a probe thermometer to test for the temperature. I use it on a number of points, not only the thickest, but also some of the thinner parts, shooting for a temp of about 170f. I've found that in the thicker end of the ribs, even 170f leaves a pinkish cast to the meat and sometimes there is a pinkish juice. I attribute the juice color more to the paprika in my rub than blood, but really don't care. BTW- when I cook ribs, I prefer to cut off the first 4 bones on the thick end, doing the remaining ribs in one rack. In my own technique, I insert the probes for temperature into the long rack (thinner ribs) and ignore the big ends. The ribs are done, usually, in about 6 hours, and I then remove the racks and give attention to the bigger 4-bone end pieces. I insert the probes into the biggest meat area and stick them back in the smoker until they're also done- usually in another hour or so. That way, my ribs are pretty uniform in doneness, without the compromise between overdone small ends and underdone big ends. Nonny |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I haven't been using my smoker long, but I've done ribs 4-5 times (an
have 3 racks on right now for supper with a buddy who just returned from Iraq) and a few port roasts. I do the same thing every time. ![]() Dry rub them with salt, pepper, onion powder and paprika. Start the smoker. Once the smoke starts, I put the ribs on at around 250f. Then I watch the smoke and when it stops, refill. I try to do this once or twice, depending on how long it smokes (just started using chunks instead of chips, so that means only one refill instead of 3, and a LOT more smoke). Then I don't even LOOK at them for at least 5 hours (except to monitor the temp of the smoker). Then I check them every hour after that. What I look for is that the meat is pulled back about 1/2" on the bone, and when I grab them with tongs and lift them in the middle and bounce them, the meat cracks/falls away from the bone. So far each time has taken about 7 hours. I like em a little extra tender so they melt in your mouth. ![]() As I learned quickly (from this board and others).. they're done when they're done. No special time limit. No thermometer probes, etc. But I always start them expecting 7 hours. That way around 4-5 I start sippin beer and checking them every hour or so. ![]() the first time and took them off at 170 (after only 4 hours). They were chewy, had lots of fat and connective tissue.. ugh... yuck. 2.5 more hours and they were 1000 times better. Another key factor I've seen is the skin on the bottom turns a dark yellow and becomes crispy (and easily is pulled off). Another sign they are most likely done. |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "HC" > wrote in message ups.com... > I'm not a cook by any means, but I do a little welding so I built a > smoker 'cause it seemed like the thing to do. I have a thermometer at > the deck level (level the food is sitting on) and I've used this thing > several times with no problem. Tonight I thought I'd try pork spare > ribs and do them differently than in the past. In the past I cook > them 30 minutes unwrapped to get the smoke flavor (all this is over > split, old post oak (I think it's Post Oak, it's the stuff we have > like heat in north central Texas)) then wrap them up in aluminum foil > for another 2 and half hours, all of it at 300 degrees F. They turn > out done and tender but not like what I see at competitions. > > Tonight I tried them at 200-225 for 5 hours unwrapped then wrapped for > an hour at about 300. When I cut into them, even the end-most rib > bone, the juices appeared pink/red. Is that really the blood color or > is that some other effect I'm seeing? I was afraid to eat them and > wrapped them back up and have them sitting on the smoker at about 225 > and will leave them there all night, for as long as the fire burns, > because it's time for bed and I can't stay up all night checking them. > > My big concern is that I was taught to look for "clear" juices and > these appeared pink even after a total of FIVE hours at approximately > 200-225 degrees or so and then an hour at almost 300 degrees. > > Anyway, I'd appreciate any thoughts or knowledge on this. Thank you. > > --HC The term "clear juices:" refers to usually to poultry . It was a way of verifying the Chicken etc was cooked completely. When dealing with pork or beef etc the benchmark is the temperature of the meat. Your best guide is a instant read thermometer. The only concern with pork WAS Trichinosis which today is extremely rare and usually comes from game and not from commercial products. Herr is what the cdc says. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dpd/parasi...richinosis.htm How can I prevent trichinellosis? a.. Cook meat products until the juices run clear or to an internal temperature of 170 o F. b.. Freeze pork less than 6 inches thick for 20 days at 5 o F to kill any worms. c.. Cook wild game meat thoroughly. Freezing wild game meats, unlike freezing pork products, even for long periods of time, may not effectively kill all worms. d.. Cook all meat fed to pigs or other wild animals. e.. Do not allow hogs to eat uncooked carcasses of other animals, including rats, which may be infected with trichinellosis. f.. Clean meat grinders thoroughly if you prepare your own ground meats. g.. Curing (salting), drying, smoking, or microwaving meat does not consistently kill infective worms. Dimitri |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tutall wrote:
> > I suggest forgoing the foil, cooking at about 250 for 5 or so hours > till the meat pulls back and shows about 1/2" of bone or so or when > picked up in the middle it cracks/breaks. Any red you'll see won't > look anything like raw meat, that's for sure. > Agree. Loose the foil, throw 'em on and forget about 'em for 4-5 hours. When then break when bent, they're done. -- Steve |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
> When I cut into them, even the end-most rib
> bone, the juices appeared pink/red. Is that really the blood color or > is that some other effect I'm seeing? Pork won't have a whole lot of red IME, even raw. After several hours on the smoker I think you're seeing the smoke ring, a red band that penetrates the meat to a depth of maybe ¼-inch. Do a google search for: "smoke ring" ribs And see what pops up. -John O |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tutall wrote:
> ??? Cooking the ribs in foil???? Why steam the ribs? > I suggest forgoing the foil, cooking at about 250 for 5 or so hours > till the meat pulls back and shows about 1/2" of bone or so or when > picked up in the middle it cracks/breaks. Any red you'll see won't > look anything like raw meat, that's for sure. I totally agree except I cook mine in the 300-325 range. When they've pulled back and crack, it's time to eat. -frohe |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 8, 11:56 pm, HC > wrote:
> > Tonight I tried them at 200-225 for 5 hours unwrapped then wrapped for > an hour at about 300. When I cut into them, even the end-most rib > bone, the juices appeared pink/red. Is that really the blood color or > is that some other effect I'm seeing? I was afraid to eat them and > wrapped them back up and have them sitting on the smoker at about 225 > and will leave them there all night, for as long as the fire burns, > because it's time for bed and I can't stay up all night checking them. > > My big concern is that I was taught to look for "clear" juices and > these appeared pink even after a total of FIVE hours at approximately > 200-225 degrees or so and then an hour at almost 300 degrees. > > Anyway, I'd appreciate any thoughts or knowledge on this. Thank you. Pink juices are not blood in pork, beef, or any meat. All the blood is removed in the slaughterhouse. Pink juices are myoglobin, a protein. At about 140F internal temp meat begins to turn pink as the myoglobin begins to change. As the temperature rises and the myoglobin changes, the juices go from pink to clear, and the meat turns tan. If your temps are right, these ribs are done. My rule of thumb: St. Louis cut ribs: 5-6 hours at 225F, baby backs 3 hours at 225F. For more on the thermodynamics of rib cooking go to http://amazingribs.com/technique/rib_science.html For more on how to tell if the ribs are ready, go to http://amazingribs.com/technique/are_they_ready.html Craig "Meathead" Goldwyn |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 9, 3:16 pm, "JohnO" > wrote:
> Do a google search for: > "smoke ring" ribs > And see what pops up. Here's a good picture of a smoke ring: http://amazingribs.com/technique/ana...baby_back.html Craig "Meathead" Goldwyn |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 9, 4:29 pm, "frohe" > wrote:
> Tutall wrote: > > ??? Cooking the ribs in foil???? Why steam the ribs? > > I suggest forgoing the foil, cooking at about 250 for 5 or so hours > > till the meat pulls back and shows about 1/2" of bone or so or when > > picked up in the middle it cracks/breaks. Any red you'll see won't > > look anything like raw meat, that's for sure. > > I totally agree except I cook mine in the 300-325 range. When they've > pulled back and crack, it's time to eat. > > -frohe Most of the top competition barbecue cooks put their ribs in foil near the end of the cook, a technique called "The Texas Crutch" for about an hour. They don't steam too much, but they do gain moisture and tenderness. Do it for much longer and the meat will get mushy. They put a little sauce or apple juice in the foil. Then they take the slab out and put it back in dry heat to firm up the surface. For more on the Texas Crutch: http://amazingribs.com/technique/texas_crutch.html Craig "Meathead" Goldwyn |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Having just completed my "ServSafe" course, The PDA now says pork & beef are
to be cooked to a minimun of 145`..poultry-165' anything reheated must go to 165` for 15 seconds,then can be held at a minimum of 135`. |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 9, 10:26 am, Olde Hippee > wrote:
> On Aug 9, 12:56 am, HC > wrote: > > > > > > > I'm not a cook by any means, but I do a little welding so I built a > > smoker 'cause it seemed like the thing to do. I have a thermometer at > > the deck level (level the food is sitting on) and I've used this thing > > several times with no problem. Tonight I thought I'd try pork spare > > ribs and do them differently than in the past. In the past I cook > > them 30 minutes unwrapped to get the smoke flavor (all this is over > > split, old post oak (I think it's Post Oak, it's the stuff we have > > like heat in north central Texas)) then wrap them up in aluminum foil > > for another 2 and half hours, all of it at 300 degrees F. They turn > > out done and tender but not like what I see at competitions. > > > Tonight I tried them at 200-225 for 5 hours unwrapped then wrapped for > > an hour at about 300. When I cut into them, even the end-most rib > > bone, the juices appeared pink/red. Is that really the blood color or > > is that some other effect I'm seeing? I was afraid to eat them and > > wrapped them back up and have them sitting on the smoker at about 225 > > and will leave them there all night, for as long as the fire burns, > > because it's time for bed and I can't stay up all night checking them. > > > My big concern is that I was taught to look for "clear" juices and > > these appeared pink even after a total of FIVE hours at approximately > > 200-225 degrees or so and then an hour at almost 300 degrees. > > > Anyway, I'd appreciate any thoughts or knowledge on this. Thank you. > > > --HC > > If you go to Kamado.com to their forums, recipes, and look for the > 1-2-3 method, that is what hubby uses. I know the first hour is > uncovered, and think the next 2 are in foil, then 3 sealed tightly > wrapped up in towels in a cooler to sweat/tenderize, but check it to > be sure. Loads of recipes there that will work on any cooker in which > you can control the temp. > I can't imagine how those ribs could NOT have been done after that > much time cooking esp on 300. Good Luck. Nanzi- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Nanzi, thank you for your reply. I will look that up. Yeah, the ribs should have been carbon dust by the end of 6 hours. ![]() food poisoning isn't necessarily a bad thing. ![]() --HC |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 9, 1:27 pm, Nonnymus > wrote:
> Tutall wrote: > > On Aug 9, 8:26 am, Olde Hippee > wrote: > >> On Aug 9, 12:56 am, HC > wrote: > >> I can't imagine how those ribs could NOT have been done after that > >> much time cooking esp on 300. Good Luck. Nanzi- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > ??? Cooking the ribs in foil???? Why steam the ribs? > > > I suggest forgoing the foil, cooking at about 250 for 5 or so hours > > till the meat pulls back and shows about 1/2" of bone or so or when > > picked up in the middle it cracks/breaks. Any red you'll see won't > > look anything like raw meat, that's for sure. > > When I cook ribs, I use a probe thermometer to test for the temperature. > I use it on a number of points, not only the thickest, but also some > of the thinner parts, shooting for a temp of about 170f. I've found > that in the thicker end of the ribs, even 170f leaves a pinkish cast to > the meat and sometimes there is a pinkish juice. I attribute the juice > color more to the paprika in my rub than blood, but really don't care. > > BTW- when I cook ribs, I prefer to cut off the first 4 bones on the > thick end, doing the remaining ribs in one rack. In my own technique, I > insert the probes for temperature into the long rack (thinner ribs) and > ignore the big ends. The ribs are done, usually, in about 6 hours, and > I then remove the racks and give attention to the bigger 4-bone end > pieces. I insert the probes into the biggest meat area and stick them > back in the smoker until they're also done- usually in another hour or > so. That way, my ribs are pretty uniform in doneness, without the > compromise between overdone small ends and underdone big ends. > > Nonny Thank you, Noony, for your reply. That sounds like a good idea/ method. The best idea still seems to be to trust the science (the temperature) which I just plain did not think of at the time. --HC |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 9, 1:34 pm, "Bradley V. Stone" >
wrote: > I haven't been using my smoker long, but I've done ribs 4-5 times (an > have 3 racks on right now for supper with a buddy who just returned from > Iraq) and a few port roasts. I do the same thing every time. ![]() > > Dry rub them with salt, pepper, onion powder and paprika. > > Start the smoker. Once the smoke starts, I put the ribs on at around > 250f. Then I watch the smoke and when it stops, refill. I try to do > this once or twice, depending on how long it smokes (just started using > chunks instead of chips, so that means only one refill instead of 3, and > a LOT more smoke). > > Then I don't even LOOK at them for at least 5 hours (except to monitor > the temp of the smoker). Then I check them every hour after that. > > What I look for is that the meat is pulled back about 1/2" on the bone, > and when I grab them with tongs and lift them in the middle and bounce > them, the meat cracks/falls away from the bone. > > So far each time has taken about 7 hours. I like em a little extra > tender so they melt in your mouth. ![]() > > As I learned quickly (from this board and others).. they're done when > they're done. No special time limit. No thermometer probes, etc. But > I always start them expecting 7 hours. That way around 4-5 I start > sippin beer and checking them every hour or so. ![]() > the first time and took them off at 170 (after only 4 hours). They were > chewy, had lots of fat and connective tissue.. ugh... yuck. 2.5 more > hours and they were 1000 times better. > > Another key factor I've seen is the skin on the bottom turns a dark > yellow and becomes crispy (and easily is pulled off). Another sign they > are most likely done. Hey, Bradley, thank you for your reply. I may have been expecting a simple "a then b then c" method like what I've used on baby back ribs (which NEVER turned out like the spare ribs I've seen others make). Several people have suggested methods of checking doneness like looking for the meat to pull back from the bone and attempting to break the rack in the middle. I'll look for and try something like that, but I'm going to also follow one suggestion that I should have thought of that night: use a thermometer. ![]() Thank you for the detailed instructions on how you do yours. --HC |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 9, 2:45 pm, "Dimitri" > wrote:
> "HC" > wrote in message > > ups.com... > > > > > > > I'm not a cook by any means, but I do a little welding so I built a > > smoker 'cause it seemed like the thing to do. I have a thermometer at > > the deck level (level the food is sitting on) and I've used this thing > > several times with no problem. Tonight I thought I'd try pork spare > > ribs and do them differently than in the past. In the past I cook > > them 30 minutes unwrapped to get the smoke flavor (all this is over > > split, old post oak (I think it's Post Oak, it's the stuff we have > > like heat in north central Texas)) then wrap them up in aluminum foil > > for another 2 and half hours, all of it at 300 degrees F. They turn > > out done and tender but not like what I see at competitions. > > > Tonight I tried them at 200-225 for 5 hours unwrapped then wrapped for > > an hour at about 300. When I cut into them, even the end-most rib > > bone, the juices appeared pink/red. Is that really the blood color or > > is that some other effect I'm seeing? I was afraid to eat them and > > wrapped them back up and have them sitting on the smoker at about 225 > > and will leave them there all night, for as long as the fire burns, > > because it's time for bed and I can't stay up all night checking them. > > > My big concern is that I was taught to look for "clear" juices and > > these appeared pink even after a total of FIVE hours at approximately > > 200-225 degrees or so and then an hour at almost 300 degrees. > > > Anyway, I'd appreciate any thoughts or knowledge on this. Thank you. > > > --HC > > The term "clear juices:" refers to usually to poultry . It was a way of > verifying the Chicken etc was cooked completely. When dealing with pork or beef > etc the benchmark is the temperature of the meat. Your best guide is a instant > read thermometer. The only concern with pork WAS Trichinosis which today is > extremely rare and usually comes from game and not from commercial products. > > Herr is what the cdc says. > > http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dpd/parasi...tsht_trichinos... > > How can I prevent trichinellosis? > a.. Cook meat products until the juices run clear or to an internal > temperature of 170 o F. > b.. Freeze pork less than 6 inches thick for 20 days at 5 o F to kill any > worms. > c.. Cook wild game meat thoroughly. Freezing wild game meats, unlike freezing > pork products, even for long periods of time, may not effectively kill all > worms. > d.. Cook all meat fed to pigs or other wild animals. > e.. Do not allow hogs to eat uncooked carcasses of other animals, including > rats, which may be infected with trichinellosis. > f.. Clean meat grinders thoroughly if you prepare your own ground meats. > g.. Curing (salting), drying, smoking, or microwaving meat does not > consistently kill infective worms. > Dimitri- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Thank you, Dimitri, for the information. --HC |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 9, 3:16 pm, "JohnO" > wrote:
> > When I cut into them, even the end-most rib > > bone, the juices appeared pink/red. Is that really the blood color or > > is that some other effect I'm seeing? > > Pork won't have a whole lot of red IME, even raw. After several hours on the > smoker I think you're seeing the smoke ring, a red band that penetrates the > meat to a depth of maybe ¼-inch. > > Do a google search for: > "smoke ring" ribs > And see what pops up. > > -John O Hey, John, thanks for your reply. I am familiar with smoke rings and I don't think that's what this was...but the ring color could have affected the juice color. I'll do that search. --HC |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
HC wrote:
> Hey, Bradley, thank you for your reply. I may have been expecting a > simple "a then b then c" method like what I've used on baby back ribs > (which NEVER turned out like the spare ribs I've seen others make). > Several people have suggested methods of checking doneness like > looking for the meat to pull back from the bone and attempting to > break the rack in the middle. I'll look for and try something like > that, but I'm going to also follow one suggestion that I should have > thought of that night: use a thermometer. ![]() There's no need for a thermometer when doing ribs. When they've pulled back 1/2" and they crack when lifted, it's time to take em off the fire and start eating. -frohe |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 10, 8:36 am, meathead > wrote:
> On Aug 8, 11:56 pm, HC > wrote: > > > > > Tonight I tried them at 200-225 for 5 hours unwrapped then wrapped for > > an hour at about 300. When I cut into them, even the end-most rib > > bone, the juices appeared pink/red. Is that really the blood color or > > is that some other effect I'm seeing? I was afraid to eat them and > > wrapped them back up and have them sitting on the smoker at about 225 > > and will leave them there all night, for as long as the fire burns, > > because it's time for bed and I can't stay up all night checking them. > > > My big concern is that I was taught to look for "clear" juices and > > these appeared pink even after a total of FIVE hours at approximately > > 200-225 degrees or so and then an hour at almost 300 degrees. > > > Anyway, I'd appreciate any thoughts or knowledge on this. Thank you. > > Pink juices are not blood in pork, beef, or any meat. All the blood is > removed in the slaughterhouse. Pink juices are myoglobin, a protein. > At about 140F internal temp meat begins to turn pink as the myoglobin > begins to change. As the temperature rises and the myoglobin changes, > the juices go from pink to clear, and the meat turns tan. If your > temps are right, these ribs are done. My rule of thumb: St. Louis cut > ribs: 5-6 hours at 225F, baby backs 3 hours at 225F. > > For more on the thermodynamics of rib cooking go tohttp://amazingribs.com/technique/rib_science.html > > For more on how to tell if the ribs are ready, go tohttp://amazingribs.com/technique/are_they_ready.html > > Craig "Meathead" Goldwyn Craig, thank you for your reply. Your site is awesome and I've spent a couple of hours reading what you've got there. I'm feeling better about what I've done and feel like I have some new ideas of things to try to get better ribs, beyond my concerns of simply "done or not done". I love the logo you have, too. Somebody did some nice work for you on that. The extended pinkies are a nice touch. Again, thank you and nice site. --HC |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 11, 3:59 am, HC > wrote:
> On Aug 9, 10:26 am, Olde Hippee > wrote: > > > > > On Aug 9, 12:56 am, HC > wrote: > > > > I'm not a cook by any means, but I do a little welding so I built a > > > smoker 'cause it seemed like the thing to do. I have a thermometer at > > > the deck level (level the food is sitting on) and I've used this thing > > > several times with no problem. Tonight I thought I'd try pork spare > > > ribs and do them differently than in the past. In the past I cook > > > them 30 minutes unwrapped to get the smoke flavor (all this is over > > > split, old post oak (I think it's Post Oak, it's the stuff we have > > > like heat in north central Texas)) then wrap them up in aluminum foil > > > for another 2 and half hours, all of it at 300 degrees F. They turn > > > out done and tender but not like what I see at competitions. > > > > Tonight I tried them at 200-225 for 5 hours unwrapped then wrapped for > > > an hour at about 300. When I cut into them, even the end-most rib > > > bone, the juices appeared pink/red. Is that really the blood color or > > > is that some other effect I'm seeing? I was afraid to eat them and > > > wrapped them back up and have them sitting on the smoker at about 225 > > > and will leave them there all night, for as long as the fire burns, > > > because it's time for bed and I can't stay up all night checking them. > > > > My big concern is that I was taught to look for "clear" juices and > > > these appeared pink even after a total of FIVE hours at approximately > > > 200-225 degrees or so and then an hour at almost 300 degrees. > > > > Anyway, I'd appreciate any thoughts or knowledge on this. Thank you. > > > > --HC > > > If you go to Kamado.com to their forums, recipes, and look for the > > 1-2-3 method, that is what hubby uses. I know the first hour is > > uncovered, and think the next 2 are in foil, then 3 sealed tightly > > wrapped up in towels in a cooler to sweat/tenderize, but check it to > > be sure. Loads of recipes there that will work on any cooker in which > > you can control the temp. > > I can't imagine how those ribs could NOT have been done after that > > much time cooking esp on 300. Good Luck. Nanzi- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Nanzi, thank you for your reply. I will look that up. Yeah, the ribs > should have been carbon dust by the end of 6 hours. ![]() > food poisoning isn't necessarily a bad thing. ![]() > > --HC DH informed me it is 3-2-1, leave it to me to get it backwards!!! OOppppps, sorry, glad you were going to look it up!!! Ours were great when we did them that way. Nanzi |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 11, 4:26 pm, Olde Hippee > wrote:
> On Aug 11, 3:59 am, HC > wrote: > > > > > > > On Aug 9, 10:26 am, Olde Hippee > wrote: > > > > On Aug 9, 12:56 am, HC > wrote: > > > > > I'm not a cook by any means, but I do a little welding so I built a > > > > smoker 'cause it seemed like the thing to do. I have a thermometer at > > > > the deck level (level the food is sitting on) and I've used this thing > > > > several times with no problem. Tonight I thought I'd try pork spare > > > > ribs and do them differently than in the past. In the past I cook > > > > them 30 minutes unwrapped to get the smoke flavor (all this is over > > > > split, old post oak (I think it's Post Oak, it's the stuff we have > > > > like heat in north central Texas)) then wrap them up in aluminum foil > > > > for another 2 and half hours, all of it at 300 degrees F. They turn > > > > out done and tender but not like what I see at competitions. > > > > > Tonight I tried them at 200-225 for 5 hours unwrapped then wrapped for > > > > an hour at about 300. When I cut into them, even the end-most rib > > > > bone, the juices appeared pink/red. Is that really the blood color or > > > > is that some other effect I'm seeing? I was afraid to eat them and > > > > wrapped them back up and have them sitting on the smoker at about 225 > > > > and will leave them there all night, for as long as the fire burns, > > > > because it's time for bed and I can't stay up all night checking them. > > > > > My big concern is that I was taught to look for "clear" juices and > > > > these appeared pink even after a total of FIVE hours at approximately > > > > 200-225 degrees or so and then an hour at almost 300 degrees. > > > > > Anyway, I'd appreciate any thoughts or knowledge on this. Thank you. > > > > > --HC > > > > If you go to Kamado.com to their forums, recipes, and look for the > > > 1-2-3 method, that is what hubby uses. I know the first hour is > > > uncovered, and think the next 2 are in foil, then 3 sealed tightly > > > wrapped up in towels in a cooler to sweat/tenderize, but check it to > > > be sure. Loads of recipes there that will work on any cooker in which > > > you can control the temp. > > > I can't imagine how those ribs could NOT have been done after that > > > much time cooking esp on 300. Good Luck. Nanzi- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Nanzi, thank you for your reply. I will look that up. Yeah, the ribs > > should have been carbon dust by the end of 6 hours. ![]() > > food poisoning isn't necessarily a bad thing. ![]() > > > --HC > > DH informed me it is 3-2-1, leave it to me to get it backwards!!! > OOppppps, sorry, glad you were going to look it up!!! Ours were great > when we did them that way. Nanzi- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Yeah, I found a method called 3-2-1 and I wondered. ![]() for government work. ![]() --HC |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
2 hours in foil is waaaaay too long in my opinion. It will mushify the
meat. I say 30 minutes max. Here's my article on the Texas Crutch: http://amazingribs.com/technique/texas_crutch.html meathead On Aug 14, 9:18 pm, HC > wrote: > On Aug 11, 4:26 pm, Olde Hippee > wrote: > > > > > On Aug 11, 3:59 am, HC > wrote: > > > > On Aug 9, 10:26 am, Olde Hippee > wrote: > > > > > On Aug 9, 12:56 am, HC > wrote: > > > > > > I'm not a cook by any means, but I do a little welding so I built a > > > > > smoker 'cause it seemed like the thing to do. I have a thermometer at > > > > > the deck level (level the food is sitting on) and I've used this thing > > > > > several times with no problem. Tonight I thought I'd try pork spare > > > > > ribs and do them differently than in the past. In the past I cook > > > > > them 30 minutes unwrapped to get the smoke flavor (all this is over > > > > > split, old post oak (I think it's Post Oak, it's the stuff we have > > > > > like heat in north central Texas)) then wrap them up in aluminum foil > > > > > for another 2 and half hours, all of it at 300 degrees F. They turn > > > > > out done and tender but not like what I see at competitions. > > > > > > Tonight I tried them at 200-225 for 5 hours unwrapped then wrapped for > > > > > an hour at about 300. When I cut into them, even the end-most rib > > > > > bone, the juices appeared pink/red. Is that really the blood color or > > > > > is that some other effect I'm seeing? I was afraid to eat them and > > > > > wrapped them back up and have them sitting on the smoker at about 225 > > > > > and will leave them there all night, for as long as the fire burns, > > > > > because it's time for bed and I can't stay up all night checking them. > > > > > > My big concern is that I was taught to look for "clear" juices and > > > > > these appeared pink even after a total of FIVE hours at approximately > > > > > 200-225 degrees or so and then an hour at almost 300 degrees. > > > > > > Anyway, I'd appreciate any thoughts or knowledge on this. Thank you. > > > > > > --HC > > > > > If you go to Kamado.com to their forums, recipes, and look for the > > > > 1-2-3 method, that is what hubby uses. I know the first hour is > > > > uncovered, and think the next 2 are in foil, then 3 sealed tightly > > > > wrapped up in towels in a cooler to sweat/tenderize, but check it to > > > > be sure. Loads of recipes there that will work on any cooker in which > > > > you can control the temp. > > > > I can't imagine how those ribs could NOT have been done after that > > > > much time cooking esp on 300. Good Luck. Nanzi- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > Nanzi, thank you for your reply. I will look that up. Yeah, the ribs > > > should have been carbon dust by the end of 6 hours. ![]() > > > food poisoning isn't necessarily a bad thing. ![]() > > > > --HC > > > DH informed me it is 3-2-1, leave it to me to get it backwards!!! > > OOppppps, sorry, glad you were going to look it up!!! Ours were great > > when we did them that way. Nanzi- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Yeah, I found a method called 3-2-1 and I wondered. ![]() > for government work. ![]() > > --HC |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
HC wrote:
> I'll look for and try something like > that, but I'm going to also follow one suggestion that I should have > thought of that night: use a thermometer. ![]() > > Thank you for the detailed instructions on how you do yours. > > --HC No thermometer for ribs your they're turn out undone.. I only use thermometer for larger pieces of meat. |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 16, 6:47 am, "Bradley V. Stone" >
wrote: > HC wrote: > > I'll look for and try something like > > that, but I'm going to also follow one suggestion that I should have > > thought of that night: use a thermometer. ![]() > > > Thank you for the detailed instructions on how you do yours. > > > --HC > > No thermometer for ribs your they're turn out undone.. I only use > thermometer for larger pieces of meat. Yeah, but HC is a chemist, not a cook, needs the mechanical feedback. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Two 2lb pork spare ribs - too small? | Barbecue | |||
Pork Spare Ribs | Barbecue | |||
Pork Spare Ribs | Barbecue | |||
Pork Brisket, from Spare Ribs ? | Barbecue | |||
Pork Brisket, from Spare Ribs ? | Barbecue |