The world’s best Restaurant. Indian Recipes, Total Health Recipes and
lots more.
A restaurant is a fantasy-a kind of living fantasy in which diners are
the most important members of the cast. click here
***************************
http://dine.com/go/g947876-pv
***************************

Nunya Bidnits wrote:

> Second spam message on behalf of dine.com in three days.

The postings are not coming from dine.com. The person is just
advertising dine.com in his .sig to get some sort of click-revenue.

ObBBQ: I feel in the mood for a couple ****s this weekend. Err, I
meant DUCKS, but why not do both anyway?

-sw

"Nunya Bidnits" > wrote in message
...
> Sqwertz wrote:
>> Nunya Bidnits wrote:
>>
>>> Second spam message on behalf of dine.com in three days.
>>
>> The postings are not coming from dine.com. The person is just
>> advertising dine.com in his .sig to get some sort of click-revenue.
>>
>> ObBBQ: I feel in the mood for a couple ****s this weekend. Err, I
>> meant DUCKS, but why not do both anyway?
>>
>> -sw
>
> They (dine.com) are still a spammer, as they benefit from the spam, and
> pay
> the party who posted the spam. I use a program that distinguishes between
> body text and sig lines, QuoteFix. Its not in his sig, its message body.
> Its
> probably a troll for friendfinder, who are very aggresive about planting
> phony websites which then push their matchmaking sites. The postings are
> coming from gmail, who won't act, through google groups, more of the same.
>
> The posting host is in India. If you report that, as if they even had an
> abuse address, which they do not, they will just sell your address.
>
> Even if they are just selling clicks, its still spam, and reporting it to
> the beneficiary's host causes them to have to handle the complaints or get
> blacklisted if there are enough of them. If they are paying spammers for
> clicks, then screw 'em. That makes them spammers according to blacklisting
> authorities. They are still responsible, and reporting them to their host
> causes them trouble. And if google groups does happen to act on it (when
> pigs fly) it may even screw with the moron in India posting from
> sancharnet.in. But that's very unlikely, so the only route worth pursuing
> is
> dine.com.
>
> This group is pretty spam free, and making it an inhospitable place for
> spammers is worthwhile.
>
> MartyB in KC
>

And if you'd not replied to the SPAMMER, I'd never have seen the message(s)
from the SPAMMER.

BOB

"Nunya Bidnits" > wrote in message
...
> BOB wrote:
>> "Nunya Bidnits" > wrote
>
>>>
>>> This group is pretty spam free, and making it an inhospitable place
>>> for spammers is worthwhile.
>>>
>>> MartyB in KC
>>>
>>
>> And if you'd not replied to the SPAMMER, I'd never have seen the
>> message(s) from the SPAMMER.
>>
>> BOB
>
> Obviously a lot of us saw it. How are you filtering?

I donno. Maybe my news server? Maybe something I had previously set up?
Maybe my computer just doesn't like spam?
>
BOB