Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Barbecue (alt.food.barbecue) Discuss barbecue and grilling--southern style "low and slow" smoking of ribs, shoulders and briskets, as well as direct heat grilling of everything from burgers to salmon to vegetables. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just returned from WalMart, home of the recently-arrested 300+ illegal
immigrants, where I found Black & Decker vacuum-sealer bags. A box with two 18-ft long, 11-inch (gallon) rolls cost me $13.84 ($6.92 per roll). The Tilia bags were selling for $9.97 for 15 pre-made 1-gallon bags (about 66 cents per bag). I'm guessing the pre-sealed bags are about 12-inches long. So, at that rate, I'm getting 36 1-gallon bags for $13.84 (about 38 cents per bag). While it says on the box that they "work with leading brand vacuum sealers," I wasn't sure of how well they'd work with my Tilia, so I only bought one box. I just tried making one bag and sealing an apple and it works just dandy. I'm going back to wipe them out. Just thought I'd share. -- Stan <http://www.tocquevillian.com> |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stan (the Man)" > wrote in message t... > I just returned from WalMart, home of the recently-arrested 300+ illegal > immigrants, where I found Black & Decker vacuum-sealer bags. A box with > two 18-ft long, 11-inch (gallon) rolls cost me $13.84 ($6.92 per roll). > The Tilia bags were selling for $9.97 for 15 pre-made 1-gallon bags > (about 66 cents per bag). I'm guessing the pre-sealed bags are about > 12-inches long. So, at that rate, I'm getting 36 1-gallon bags for > $13.84 (about 38 cents per bag). > > While it says on the box that they "work with leading brand vacuum > sealers," I wasn't sure of how well they'd work with my Tilia, so I only > bought one box. I just tried making one bag and sealing an apple and it > works just dandy. I'm going back to wipe them out. > > Just thought I'd share. > > -- > Stan > <http://www.tocquevillian.com> > Been using them a while...In fact I haven't ever used the Tila rolls or bags...can you tell any difference? Jack |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jack Sloan wrote: > "Stan (the Man)" > wrote in message > t... > >>I just returned from WalMart, home of the recently-arrested 300+ illegal >>immigrants, where I found Black & Decker vacuum-sealer bags. A box with >>two 18-ft long, 11-inch (gallon) rolls cost me $13.84 ($6.92 per roll). >>The Tilia bags were selling for $9.97 for 15 pre-made 1-gallon bags >>(about 66 cents per bag). I'm guessing the pre-sealed bags are about >>12-inches long. So, at that rate, I'm getting 36 1-gallon bags for >>$13.84 (about 38 cents per bag). >> >>While it says on the box that they "work with leading brand vacuum >>sealers," I wasn't sure of how well they'd work with my Tilia, so I only >>bought one box. I just tried making one bag and sealing an apple and it >>works just dandy. I'm going back to wipe them out. >> >>Just thought I'd share. >> >>-- >>Stan >><http://www.tocquevillian.com> >> > > Been using them a while...In fact I haven't ever used the Tila rolls or > bags...can you tell any difference? > Jack Only difference I can see is the Tilia bags have that crosshatch that channel the air out. The B&D have those two inside flaps that appear to perform the same function. -- Stan <http://www.tocquevillian.com> |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stan (the Man)" > wrote in message t... A box with > two 18-ft long, 11-inch (gallon) rolls cost me $13.84 ($6.92 per roll). $13.84/396 = $0.0349/sqft. I recently bought 4-11"x18' & 2-8"x22' Tillia bags at Costco for $39.95. $39.95/1144 = $0.0349/sqft. Well, shit. Maybe Sam's Club will get the Black & Decker bags and sell a 6-pack for $0.02! Spud |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 20:48:45 GMT, "Spud" > wrote:
>"Stan (the Man)" > wrote in message et... > > > A box with >> two 18-ft long, 11-inch (gallon) rolls cost me $13.84 ($6.92 per roll). > >$13.84/396 = $0.0349/sqft. > > I recently bought 4-11"x18' & 2-8"x22' Tillia bags at Costco for $39.95. >$39.95/1144 = $0.0349/sqft. My turn, math-spud: Those are square inches,not feet :-P -sw |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
> My turn, math-spud:
> > Those are square inches,not feet :-P > > -sw You got me there! Freshman mistake. The correct numbers a A box with two 18-ft long, 11-inch (gallon) rolls cost me $13.84 ($6.92 per roll). $13.84 / (2*11/12*18)= 0.42 /sqft. B&D @ Walmart .. I recently bought 4-11"x18' & 2-8"x22' Tillia bags at Costco for $39.95. $39.95/ (4*11/12*18) + (2*8/12*22) =39.95/ 95.33 =$0.42/sqft. Tillia @ Costco So an 11x12 costs 39 cents. Still pretty expensive compared to Ziplocks. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The correct numbers are $0.42/sqft.
See below. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Try here! cheepest I've found yet
http://www.dessicant.com/channel_bags.html Walt On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 18:20:58 GMT, "Stan (the Man)" > wrote: >I just returned from WalMart, home of the recently-arrested 300+ illegal >immigrants, where I found Black & Decker vacuum-sealer bags. A box with >two 18-ft long, 11-inch (gallon) rolls cost me $13.84 ($6.92 per roll). >The Tilia bags were selling for $9.97 for 15 pre-made 1-gallon bags >(about 66 cents per bag). I'm guessing the pre-sealed bags are about >12-inches long. So, at that rate, I'm getting 36 1-gallon bags for >$13.84 (about 38 cents per bag). > >While it says on the box that they "work with leading brand vacuum >sealers," I wasn't sure of how well they'd work with my Tilia, so I only >bought one box. I just tried making one bag and sealing an apple and it >works just dandy. I'm going back to wipe them out. > >Just thought I'd share. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Walter H. Lewis III" > wrote in message ... > Try here! cheepest I've found yet > > http://www.dessicant.com/channel_bags.html > > Walt > I want the NitroVac! Jack |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Walter H. Lewis III wrote: > Try here! cheepest I've found yet > > http://www.dessicant.com/channel_bags.html > > Walt You've tried these with the Tilia and they work? -- Stan <http://www.tocquevillian.com> > On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 18:20:58 GMT, "Stan (the Man)" > > wrote: > > >>I just returned from WalMart, home of the recently-arrested 300+ illegal >>immigrants, where I found Black & Decker vacuum-sealer bags. A box with >>two 18-ft long, 11-inch (gallon) rolls cost me $13.84 ($6.92 per roll). >>The Tilia bags were selling for $9.97 for 15 pre-made 1-gallon bags >>(about 66 cents per bag). I'm guessing the pre-sealed bags are about >>12-inches long. So, at that rate, I'm getting 36 1-gallon bags for >>$13.84 (about 38 cents per bag). >> >>While it says on the box that they "work with leading brand vacuum >>sealers," I wasn't sure of how well they'd work with my Tilia, so I only >>bought one box. I just tried making one bag and sealing an apple and it >>works just dandy. I'm going back to wipe them out. >> >>Just thought I'd share. > > |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stan (the Man) wrote:
> > > Walter H. Lewis III wrote: > >> Try here! cheepest I've found yet >> >> http://www.dessicant.com/channel_bags.html >> >> Walt > > > You've tried these with the Tilia and they work? > I've tried 'em and they work. But I think Tilia rolls at Sam's Club are a little cheaper. Bob |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "zxcvbob" > wrote in message > >> Try here! cheepest I've found yet > >> > >> http://www.dessicant.com/channel_bags.html > >> > >> Walt > > > > > > You've tried these with the Tilia and they work? > > > > I've tried 'em and they work. But I think Tilia rolls at Sam's Club are a > little cheaper. They no longer sell the Tilia style bags. They go caught selling out the back door, so to speak. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 22:12:18 GMT, Walter H. Lewis III
> wrote: >Try here! cheepest I've found yet > >http://www.dessicant.com/channel_bags.html They can't sell the channel bags anymore. Tilia's lawyers made them stop. I tried placing an order in May. Nada. Zip. Zilch. got a note back saying I'm ass-out. -sw |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Steve Wertz wrote: > On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 22:12:18 GMT, Walter H. Lewis III > > wrote: > > > >>Try here! cheepest I've found yet >> >>http://www.dessicant.com/channel_bags.html > > > They can't sell the channel bags anymore. Tilia's lawyers made them > stop. > > I tried placing an order in May. Nada. Zip. Zilch. got a note back > saying I'm ass-out. I wonder if that's why the Black & Decker bags have attached inserts, rather than crosshatching right on the bag itself. -- Stan <http://www.tocquevillian.com> |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 22:54:49 GMT, "Stan (the Man)"
> wrote: >Steve Wertz wrote: > >> On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 22:12:18 GMT, Walter H. Lewis III >> > wrote: >> >> >> >>>Try here! cheepest I've found yet >>> >>>http://www.dessicant.com/channel_bags.html >> >> >> They can't sell the channel bags anymore. Tilia's lawyers made them >> stop. >> >> I tried placing an order in May. Nada. Zip. Zilch. got a note back >> saying I'm ass-out. > >I wonder if that's why the Black & Decker bags have attached inserts, >rather than crosshatching right on the bag itself. Probably. I beleive dessicant.com manufactures the bags for Tilia. Since Tilia has a patent on the bag, Sorbent Systems (dessicant.com) can't be selling them out the back door. If somebody (B&Decker) were to come up with a significantly different design, that would keep the patent lawyers away. I hate Tilias market monopoly. The bags are overpriced (gotta pay for all those infomercials somehow). Hopefully the B&D bags (as well as the system) put a dent in their sales. -sw |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Steve Wertz wrote: > On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 22:54:49 GMT, "Stan (the Man)" > > wrote: > > >>Steve Wertz wrote: >> >> >>>On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 22:12:18 GMT, Walter H. Lewis III > wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>Try here! cheepest I've found yet >>>> >>>>http://www.dessicant.com/channel_bags.html >>> >>> >>>They can't sell the channel bags anymore. Tilia's lawyers made them >>>stop. >>> >>>I tried placing an order in May. Nada. Zip. Zilch. got a note back >>>saying I'm ass-out. >> >>I wonder if that's why the Black & Decker bags have attached inserts, >>rather than crosshatching right on the bag itself. > > > Probably. I beleive dessicant.com manufactures the bags for Tilia. > Since Tilia has a patent on the bag, Sorbent Systems (dessicant.com) > can't be selling them out the back door. > > If somebody (B&Decker) were to come up with a significantly different > design, that would keep the patent lawyers away. > > I hate Tilias market monopoly. The bags are overpriced (gotta pay for > all those infomercials somehow). Hopefully the B&D bags (as well as > the system) put a dent in their sales. > > -sw They will, if I have anything to do with it. -- Stan <http://www.tocquevillian.com> |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Walter H. Lewis III" > wrote in message ... > Try here! cheepest I've found yet > > http://www.dessicant.com/channel_bags.html > > Walt > <snip> The dessicant.com link leads to Sorbent Systems which is the actual manufacturer of most vacuum bags. They do in fact manufacture the Foodsaver/Tilia bags, but will no longer sell them retail. Foodsaver holds the patent. Sorbent does retail bags for their own vacuum sealers and they are a great deal cheaper. I buy their 8 X 12" bags for 10.5 cents apiece. I also use a lot of their 6 X 8" bags which are even cheaper. Check the site for pricing of various sizes. Brick (and his Sinbo VS 280 Vac Sealer) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 08:05:32 -0400, "Brick" >
wrote: > >"Walter H. Lewis III" > wrote in message .. . >> Try here! cheepest I've found yet >> >> http://www.dessicant.com/channel_bags.html >> >> Walt >> ><snip> > >The dessicant.com link leads to Sorbent Systems which is the actual >manufacturer of most vacuum bags. They do in fact manufacture the >Foodsaver/Tilia bags, but will no longer sell them retail. Foodsaver >holds the patent. Sorbent does retail bags for their own vacuum >sealers and they are a great deal cheaper. I buy their 8 X 12" bags >for 10.5 cents apiece. I also use a lot of their 6 X 8" bags which are >even cheaper. Check the site for pricing of various sizes. > >Brick (and his Sinbo VS 280 Vac Sealer) > Brick, how do you like your Sinbo? In fact, since most folks around here have mainly talked about the tilia brand sealers (I got a Professional II when I was accessorizing while waiting for my Kamado to be delivered ) , we should see how many are using other sealers and get some comparisons. If there are other types of vacuum sealers that are equal or better functionally and have lower operating costs (bags, rolls, etc) that'd be some good info to share. -Chef Juke http://www.chefjuke.com "Everybody Eats when they come to MY house!" (Remove the CAPS from the return address when sending email replies) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chef Juke > wrote in message
... > > how do you like your Sinbo? > > In fact, since most folks around here have mainly talked about the > tilia brand sealers (I got a Professional II when I was accessorizing > while waiting for my Kamado to be delivered ) , we should see how many > are using other sealers and get some comparisons. If there are other > types of vacuum sealers that are equal or better functionally and have > lower operating costs (bags, rolls, etc) that'd be some good info to > share. > Chef Juke, I'm using the Sinbo and am quite pleased. The only significant downside I found when doing the research a few months ago was the Sinbo's inablility to seal bottles, etc. That's not a big deal for us. And is certainly offset by the savings in bags. -- TFM3 Note: Spam-resistant e-mail address |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chef Juke" > wrote in message > In fact, since most folks around here have mainly talked about the > tilia brand sealers (I got a Professional II when I was accessorizing > while waiting for my Kamado to be delivered ) , we should see how many > are using other sealers and get some comparisons. If there are other > types of vacuum sealers that are equal or better functionally and have > lower operating costs (bags, rolls, etc) that'd be some good info to > share. Here is a link to one site that has some comparisons, but not recent. http://www.pump-n-seal.com/vacuumtest.htm This will give at least some basis for comparison. I don't know just how much vacuum must be drawn for proper food protection. Ed http://pages.cthome.net/edhome |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hopefully there is.
I love my Tilias, but.. I Just Had to Have the Canister model. Right out of the box, the canister port was cracked. Tillia will replace for only shipping, but it looks like it will crack easily..?! >If there are other > types of vacuum sealers that are equal or better functionally and have > lower operating costs (bags, rolls, etc) that'd be some good info to > share. > > > -Chef Juke > http://www.chefjuke.com > "Everybody Eats when they come to MY house!" > > (Remove the CAPS from the return address when sending email replies) > |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chef Juke" wrote > > Brick, > > how do you like your Sinbo? > > In fact, since most folks around here have mainly talked about the > tilia brand sealers (I got a Professional II when I was accessorizing > while waiting for my Kamado to be delivered ) , we should see how many > are using other sealers and get some comparisons. If there are other > types of vacuum sealers that are equal or better functionally and have > lower operating costs (bags, rolls, etc) that'd be some good info to > share. > > > -Chef Juke CC, I have both a Foodsaver and a Sinbo VS 280 from Sorbent Systems. I've never caught Foodsaver bags on sale. They remain pretty consistently priced from store to store. I have a box of 22 1Qt Foodsaver bags here that I paid $9.99 + Tax for. ($10.69). That's 48 1/2 cents apiece. I buy Sorbent bags in quantities of 400 at a time. I split my order last time between 8 X 12" (Qts) and 6 X 8" (sandwich). Qts were 200 for $21 and sandwich were 200 for $14.50. S & H was $8.50. total cost $44.00 or 11 cents each. The Sinbo machine is referred to as a snorkel type. It has a retractable snout that holds a small portion of the bag open while it is being evacuated. Once vacuum is achieved, the bag is sealed much the same as the Tilia machine. The snorkel is retracted by a strong spring at the beginning of the sealing process with little or no loss of vacuum. I've been using my VS 280 for nearly a year now and I use a lot of bags. Far more then I could justify were I using the Foodsaver. And I don't have to bother washing bags for re-use. There is nothing special about the Sorbent bags. I doubt that there is any kind of patent on them. They are 3 mil poly bags of consistently high quality, certainly equal to the Foodsaver bags. They are made by the same company after all. Sorbent also markets heavy duty (4 mil) bags as well as various specialty types. Brick (long winded as usual) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why are they not shipping them now?
"Walter H. Lewis III" > wrote in message ... > Try here! cheepest I've found yet > > http://www.dessicant.com/channel_bags.html > > Walt > > On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 18:20:58 GMT, "Stan (the Man)" > > wrote: |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ch" > wrote in message ... > Why are they not shipping them now? > "Walter H. Lewis III" > wrote in message > ... > > Try here! cheepest I've found yet > > > > http://www.dessicant.com/channel_bags.html > > > > Walt > > > > On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 18:20:58 GMT, "Stan (the Man)" > > > wrote: > > Patent infringement. While it's true that Sorbent manufactures the bags the patent is owned by Tilia. Sorbent got caught selling patented bags without a license. The fact that Foodsaver bag marketing data remains on the Sorbent Systems site tends to indicate that they may be negotiating for a license. Who knows? Brick |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Vacuum sealer bags | Preserving | |||
Vacuum Sealer | Preserving | |||
Vacuum bag sealer | Cooking Equipment | |||
Best-Vac vacuum sealer | Cooking Equipment | |||
B&D vacuum sealer | Preserving |