mimmik wrote:

> Has anyone tried the new Polder dual-probe thermometer? Has a sensor on the
> tip of the probe for the meat, and a sensor at the back end of the probe to
> measure the cooking temp. Does it work like it should?

Those units are notorious for their high failure rate. Mine broke
immediately, and I've seen the same story reported by many in
several different forums.

--
Reg email: RegForte (at) (that free MS email service) (dot) com

"mimmik" > wrote in message
. ..
> Has anyone tried the new Polder dual-probe thermometer? Has a sensor on
the
> tip of the probe for the meat, and a sensor at the back end of the probe
to
> measure the cooking temp. Does it work like it should?
>
>
Nope, POS. Mine broke on the second use.

Jack Curry

"Reg" > wrote in message
. com...
> mimmik wrote:
>
> > Has anyone tried the new Polder dual-probe thermometer? Has a sensor on
the
> > tip of the probe for the meat, and a sensor at the back end of the probe
to
> > measure the cooking temp. Does it work like it should?
>
> Those units are notorious for their high failure rate. Mine broke
> immediately, and I've seen the same story reported by many in
> several different forums.
>
> --
> Reg email: RegForte (at) (that free MS email service) (dot) com
>

Thanks for the quick answer and info. I've decided to stick with my pair of
old one-probe thermometers.

mimmik

"Jack Curry" <Jack-Curry deletethis @cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
m...
> "mimmik" > wrote in message
> . ..
> > Has anyone tried the new Polder dual-probe thermometer? Has a sensor on
> the
> > tip of the probe for the meat, and a sensor at the back end of the probe
> to
> > measure the cooking temp. Does it work like it should?
> >
> >
> Nope, POS. Mine broke on the second use.
>
> Jack Curry
>
>
Thanks! Will not buy one of those POS's.

mimmik

mimmik wrote:
> Has anyone tried the new Polder dual-probe thermometer? Has a sensor
> on the tip of the probe for the meat, and a sensor at the back end of
> the probe to measure the cooking temp. Does it work like it should?

No, it doesn't. The last probe I bought for the one I have failed in 10
minutes. Do yaself a favor and buy two cheaper single probe therms. You'll
be glad ya did.
--
-frohe
Life is too short to be in a hurry

"frohe" > wrote in message
...
> mimmik wrote:
> > Has anyone tried the new Polder dual-probe thermometer? Has a sensor
> > on the tip of the probe for the meat, and a sensor at the back end of
> > the probe to measure the cooking temp. Does it work like it should?
>
> No, it doesn't. The last probe I bought for the one I have failed in 10
> minutes. Do yaself a favor and buy two cheaper single probe therms.
You'll
> be glad ya did.
> --
> -frohe
> Life is too short to be in a hurry
>

On the other hand, I've been using my dual-probe unit for a year now and it
has been fine.
And it's handy to just have one box to mount and keep an eye on. So I am a
happy customer.

Bill



__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>