The other guys put up a decent [adequate] [[so-so]], fight, but that's
the way it goes.

Go Flames Go!

Harry

"Harry Demidavicius" > wrote in message
...
> The other guys put up a decent [adequate] [[so-so]], fight, but that's
> the way it goes.
>
> Go Flames Go!

I'm glad that the franchise business entity operating out of Calgary and
known as the Flames is enjoying success. I'm less pleased with it being
reported here.

In article >, Steve Wertz
> wrote:

> On Thu, 20 May 2004 03:43:09 GMT, Harry Demidavicius
> > wrote:
>
> >Go Flames Go!
>
> I didn't even know Canada had a team in the NBA playoffs <shrug>
>
Yep-they beat the Sharks in OT by a score of 96-95 I think it was.

monroe(between the rails)

Harry Demidavicius wrote:

>The other guys put up a decent [adequate] [[so-so]], fight, but that's
>the way it goes.
>
>Go Flames Go!
>
Woot! And if all those crazy women want to show off their boobies,
who am I to complain?

I hear that someone has opened up a barbeque restaurant somewhere
along Crowchild across from McMahon. Have you tried it out yet?

On Thu, 20 May 2004 16:35:48 -0500, Steve Wertz
> wrote:

>On Thu, 20 May 2004 03:43:09 GMT, Harry Demidavicius
> wrote:
>
>>Go Flames Go!
>
>I didn't even know Canada had a team in the NBA playoffs <shrug>
>
>-sw

Sure you didn't . . . . .

Harry

"Jason in Dallas" > wrote in message >...
> "Harry Demidavicius" > wrote in message
> ...
> > The other guys put up a decent [adequate] [[so-so]], fight, but that's
> > the way it goes.
> >
> > Go Flames Go!
>
> I'm glad that the franchise business entity operating out of Calgary and
> known as the Flames is enjoying success. I'm less pleased with it being
> reported here.

Actually, you can get a pulled pork sandwich at Toronto Maple Leaf
games at the ACC. Harry's post is on topic once-removed.

Cam

On Fri, 21 May 2004 00:02:38 GMT, FuManchu >
wrote:

>Harry Demidavicius wrote:
>
>>The other guys put up a decent [adequate] [[so-so]], fight, but that's
>>the way it goes.
>>
>>Go Flames Go!
>>
>Woot! And if all those crazy women want to show off their boobies,
>who am I to complain?
>
There were some nice 'pairs' on display, indeed.

>I hear that someone has opened up a barbeque restaurant somewhere
>along Crowchild across from McMahon. Have you tried it out yet?

I did. I told the Owneress that she had the best public BBQ joint in
town. [She has the 'only' public BBQ joint in town.]

Pretty thin eating so far, but they are trying hard. They are fine if
you hadn't tried good BBQ. They are popular and I wish them luck.

Harry

Harry Demidavicius wrote:

>>I hear that someone has opened up a barbeque restaurant somewhere
>>along Crowchild across from McMahon. Have you tried it out yet?
>
>I did. I told the Owneress that she had the best public BBQ joint in
>town. [She has the 'only' public BBQ joint in town.]
>
>Pretty thin eating so far, but they are trying hard. They are fine if
>you hadn't tried good BBQ. They are popular and I wish them luck.
>
I'll have to give them a chance, if for no other reason to help me
decide if I want to pursue this hobby & take the plunge to buy
something capable of smoking some meat at a lower temperature. All I
have at the moment is a propane grill, which is fine for steaks, but
not great for slow cooking.

On Sun, 23 May 2004 22:29:31 GMT, FuManchu >
wrote:

>All I
>have at the moment is a propane grill, which is fine for steaks, but
>not great for slow cooking.

Have you tried? You can turn out some pretty good eats by using wood
chips or chunks in a pie pan on one burner, with the meat set to the
side over an unlighted burner.

NOTE TO ONLOOKERS: Google has archived the many, many discussions
about whether or not this technique yields BBQ. No need to resurrect
it.

--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a university somewhere in Idaho
"Who put these fingerprints on my imagination?"

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:

>On Sun, 23 May 2004 22:29:31 GMT, FuManchu >
>wrote:
>
>>All I
>>have at the moment is a propane grill, which is fine for steaks, but
>>not great for slow cooking.
>
>Have you tried? You can turn out some pretty good eats by using wood
>chips or chunks in a pie pan on one burner, with the meat set to the
>side over an unlighted burner.
>
>NOTE TO ONLOOKERS: Google has archived the many, many discussions
>about whether or not this technique yields BBQ. No need to resurrect
>it.
Yep, I've slow cooked pork tenderloins & roasts with some smoke chips.
It works alright, but I find that I can't do ribs or anything that
would require slower cooking, as I can't keep the temperature low
enough. Having lurked here, read the FAQ, and some of the archives, I
know better than to call that BBQ. ;-)

"FuManchu" > wrote in message
...
> Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 23 May 2004 22:29:31 GMT, FuManchu >
> >wrote:
> >
> >>All I
> >>have at the moment is a propane grill, which is fine for steaks, but
> >>not great for slow cooking.
> >
> >Have you tried? You can turn out some pretty good eats by using wood
> >chips or chunks in a pie pan on one burner, with the meat set to the
> >side over an unlighted burner.
> >
> >NOTE TO ONLOOKERS: Google has archived the many, many discussions
> >about whether or not this technique yields BBQ. No need to resurrect
> >it.
> Yep, I've slow cooked pork tenderloins & roasts with some smoke chips.
> It works alright, but I find that I can't do ribs or anything that
> would require slower cooking, as I can't keep the temperature low
> enough.

Try propping the lid open a little.

_________
ht_redneck