On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 21:45:19 GMT, "Banjo" >
wrote:

>Ya know, I replied on topic, made an apology for my faux pas, and generally try to be a contributor to this group. However, some would rather play nanny and beat a dead horse than just let it go.
>
>I am sure I could string those guys along for a while, but I tire of them.
>
>I wonder how many other good BBQ guys they have run off with thier holier-than-thou attitutude, and thier stick in the ass adherence to a "standard" that really don't mean shit.
>
>See ya?
>
>I don't think so.

Sensitive sonofagun, aren't you? BTW, your left eyelid is beginning to
twitch. It's very distracting.

Apparently, you're now going for a hat-trick of annoying Usenet
posting habits, since your line length is set to more than 80
characters and your posts trails behind it a bunch of HTML crap like
so much toilet paper stuck to your foot.

But you already knew that, didn't you, since you did it on purpose.

--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho
"Anything, when cooked in large enough batches, will be vile."
--Dag Right-square-bracket-gren, in alt.religion.kibology

On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 21:45:19 GMT, "Banjo" >
wrote:

>Ya know, I replied on topic, made an apology for my faux pas, and generally try to be a contributor to this group. However, some would rather play nanny and beat a dead horse than just let it go.
>
>I am sure I could string those guys along for a while, but I tire of them.
>
>I wonder how many other good BBQ guys they have run off with thier holier-than-thou attitutude, and thier stick in the ass adherence to a "standard" that really don't mean shit.
>
>See ya?
>
>I don't think so.

Sensitive sonofagun, aren't you? BTW, your left eyelid is beginning to
twitch. It's very distracting.

Apparently, you're now going for a hat-trick of annoying Usenet
posting habits, since your line length is set to more than 80
characters and your posts trails behind it a bunch of HTML crap like
so much toilet paper stuck to your foot.

But you already knew that, didn't you, since you did it on purpose.

--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho
"Anything, when cooked in large enough batches, will be vile."
--Dag Right-square-bracket-gren, in alt.religion.kibology

Joe Rizzo wrote:

> Matt:
> How is that without HTML

Much better. Thanks.

> The bird was not dry at all. In fact it was pretty moist. I thought it
> would be done in 4 hrs, but I kept it cooking until the internal temp was
> 180. I wonder if the farmer had this chicken on steroids?

I've seen modern roasters dressed for sale up to ~9#. One does have to
wonder.

> What is the difference between a stewing hen and a roasting hen?
> I thought chicken was chicken.
>

A stewing hen or fowl is an older bird, recently retired from egg
laying. A roasting chicken is a young bird, either a hen or a rooster.

Matthew

Joe Rizzo wrote:

> Matt:
> How is that without HTML

Much better. Thanks.

> The bird was not dry at all. In fact it was pretty moist. I thought it
> would be done in 4 hrs, but I kept it cooking until the internal temp was
> 180. I wonder if the farmer had this chicken on steroids?

I've seen modern roasters dressed for sale up to ~9#. One does have to
wonder.

> What is the difference between a stewing hen and a roasting hen?
> I thought chicken was chicken.
>

A stewing hen or fowl is an older bird, recently retired from egg
laying. A roasting chicken is a young bird, either a hen or a rooster.

Matthew

wrote:

> Sooooooo....
>
> Any verdict on the chicken ? Or are we still discussing HTML and TOP
> posting...
>

There have been a sufficient number of correct posts on the topic of the
original poster. Correction of style and manners is _always_ on topic.

Matthew

wrote:

> Sooooooo....
>
> Any verdict on the chicken ? Or are we still discussing HTML and TOP
> posting...
>

There have been a sufficient number of correct posts on the topic of the
original poster. Correction of style and manners is _always_ on topic.

Matthew

On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 21:37:03 GMT, "Banjo" >
wrote:

>Run, Forrest, run!
>
>
Say goodbye asshole

Harry
>
>
>"Dave Bugg" <deebuggatcharterdotnet> wrote in message
...
>>
>> This will make you double over then, Eddie.
>>
>> Hey, Banjo, just for you:
>> http://www.amishrakefight.org/gfy/
>>
>>
>

On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 21:37:03 GMT, "Banjo" >
wrote:

>Run, Forrest, run!
>
>
Say goodbye asshole

Harry
>
>
>"Dave Bugg" <deebuggatcharterdotnet> wrote in message
...
>>
>> This will make you double over then, Eddie.
>>
>> Hey, Banjo, just for you:
>> http://www.amishrakefight.org/gfy/
>>
>>
>

"Matthew L. Martin" > wrote in message
...
> Joe Rizzo wrote:
>
> > Matt:
> > How is that without HTML
>
> Much better. Thanks.
>
> > The bird was not dry at all. In fact it was pretty moist. I thought it
> > would be done in 4 hrs, but I kept it cooking until the internal temp
was
> > 180. I wonder if the farmer had this chicken on steroids?
>
> I've seen modern roasters dressed for sale up to ~9#. One does have to
> wonder.
>
> > What is the difference between a stewing hen and a roasting hen?
> > I thought chicken was chicken.
> >
>
> A stewing hen or fowl is an older bird, recently retired from egg
> laying. A roasting chicken is a young bird, either a hen or a rooster.
>
> Matthew
>
>

The stewing hen that Matthew refers to are known as boiling fowl in the UK,
and with good reason as they are fit for no other use.

We mainly use them for soup stock, but after boiling for an hour or so, the
meat does become moist and tender and can be added to different dishes. I
shudder to think what would happen if you tried smoking or roasting one of
those birds. Probably turn out foul.

Graeme

"Matthew L. Martin" > wrote in message
...
> Joe Rizzo wrote:
>
> > Matt:
> > How is that without HTML
>
> Much better. Thanks.
>
> > The bird was not dry at all. In fact it was pretty moist. I thought it
> > would be done in 4 hrs, but I kept it cooking until the internal temp
was
> > 180. I wonder if the farmer had this chicken on steroids?
>
> I've seen modern roasters dressed for sale up to ~9#. One does have to
> wonder.
>
> > What is the difference between a stewing hen and a roasting hen?
> > I thought chicken was chicken.
> >
>
> A stewing hen or fowl is an older bird, recently retired from egg
> laying. A roasting chicken is a young bird, either a hen or a rooster.
>
> Matthew
>
>

The stewing hen that Matthew refers to are known as boiling fowl in the UK,
and with good reason as they are fit for no other use.

We mainly use them for soup stock, but after boiling for an hour or so, the
meat does become moist and tender and can be added to different dishes. I
shudder to think what would happen if you tried smoking or roasting one of
those birds. Probably turn out foul.

Graeme

"Harry Demidavicius" > wrote in message
...
>
> Say goodbye asshole
>
> Harry


Okay.

Goodbye, asshole!

"Harry Demidavicius" > wrote in message
...
>
> Say goodbye asshole
>
> Harry


Okay.

Goodbye, asshole!

Banjo wrote:
> "Harry Demidavicius" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
>> Say goodbye asshole
>>
>> Harry
>
>
> Okay.
>
> Goodbye, asshole!



Harry, I'm sorry. Maybe I'm just drunk but that's funny.


TFM®

Banjo wrote:
> "Harry Demidavicius" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
>> Say goodbye asshole
>>
>> Harry
>
>
> Okay.
>
> Goodbye, asshole!



Harry, I'm sorry. Maybe I'm just drunk but that's funny.


TFM®

"TFM®" > wrote in message
. ..
> Banjo wrote:
> > "Harry Demidavicius" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > >
> >> Say goodbye asshole
> >>
> >> Harry
> >
> >
> > Okay.
> >
> > Goodbye, asshole!
>
>
>
> Harry, I'm sorry. Maybe I'm just drunk but that's funny.
>
>
> TFM®
>
>

It was too easy to resist. I'm sorry, too, Harry.

I thought about just leaving the group, but I enjoy reading the posts here,
and getting the occasional tidbit of info that helps me. I am not going to
let a few posters prevent me from enjoying this forum. I am going to _try_
not to **** off too many people.

Let's remember, the reason we are here is to enjoy the 'Q.

See ya!

-Banjo

"TFM®" > wrote in message
. ..
> Banjo wrote:
> > "Harry Demidavicius" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > >
> >> Say goodbye asshole
> >>
> >> Harry
> >
> >
> > Okay.
> >
> > Goodbye, asshole!
>
>
>
> Harry, I'm sorry. Maybe I'm just drunk but that's funny.
>
>
> TFM®
>
>

It was too easy to resist. I'm sorry, too, Harry.

I thought about just leaving the group, but I enjoy reading the posts here,
and getting the occasional tidbit of info that helps me. I am not going to
let a few posters prevent me from enjoying this forum. I am going to _try_
not to **** off too many people.

Let's remember, the reason we are here is to enjoy the 'Q.

See ya!

-Banjo

On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 03:09:24 GMT, "TFM®" >
wrote:

>Banjo wrote:
>> "Harry Demidavicius" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>>> Say goodbye asshole
>>>
>>> Harry
>>
>>
>> Okay.
>>
>> Goodbye, asshole!
>
>
>
>Harry, I'm sorry. Maybe I'm just drunk but that's funny.
>
>
>TFM®
>
Obedient Asshole , isn't he . . . . .

Harry

"Harry Demidavicius" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 03:09:24 GMT, "TFM®" >
> wrote:
>
> >Banjo wrote:
> >> "Harry Demidavicius" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> >
> >>> Say goodbye asshole
> >>>
> >>> Harry
> >>
> >>
> >> Okay.
> >>
> >> Goodbye, asshole!
> >
> >
> >
> >Harry, I'm sorry. Maybe I'm just drunk but that's funny.
> >
> >
> >TFM®
> >
> Obedient Asshole , isn't he . . . . .
>
> Harry

No, he's not.

kili

"Harry Demidavicius" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 03:09:24 GMT, "TFM®" >
> wrote:
>
> >Banjo wrote:
> >> "Harry Demidavicius" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> >
> >>> Say goodbye asshole
> >>>
> >>> Harry
> >>
> >>
> >> Okay.
> >>
> >> Goodbye, asshole!
> >
> >
> >
> >Harry, I'm sorry. Maybe I'm just drunk but that's funny.
> >
> >
> >TFM®
> >
> Obedient Asshole , isn't he . . . . .
>
> Harry

No, he's not.

kili

On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 05:17:47 GMT, "Mrs. Fat Man®"
> wrote:

>
>"Harry Demidavicius" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 03:09:24 GMT, "TFM®" >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Banjo wrote:
>> >> "Harry Demidavicius" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >> >
>> >>> Say goodbye asshole
>> >>>
>> >>> Harry
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Okay.
>> >>
>> >> Goodbye, asshole!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Harry, I'm sorry. Maybe I'm just drunk but that's funny.
>> >
>> >
>> >TFM®
>> >
>> Obedient Asshole , isn't he . . . . .
>>
>> Harry
>
>No, he's not.

Harry was referring to the Banjo d00d. And, yes, he is.

--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a university somewhere in Idaho
"Who put these fingerprints on my imagination?"

"Kevin S. Wilson" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 05:17:47 GMT, "Mrs. Fat Man®"
> > wrote:
>
> >
> >"Harry Demidavicius" > wrote in message
> .. .
> >> On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 03:09:24 GMT, "TFM®" >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Banjo wrote:
> >> >> "Harry Demidavicius" > wrote in message
> >> >> ...
> >> >> >
> >> >>> Say goodbye asshole
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Harry
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Okay.
> >> >>
> >> >> Goodbye, asshole!
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Harry, I'm sorry. Maybe I'm just drunk but that's funny.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >TFM®
> >> >
> >> Obedient Asshole , isn't he . . . . .
> >>
> >> Harry
> >
> >No, he's not.
>
> Harry was referring to the Banjo d00d. And, yes, he is.
>
> --

I realize that now, I consumed too much yesterday. My apologies.

kili

"Harry Demidavicius" > wrote in message > >
> >TFM®
> >
> Obedient Asshole , isn't he . . . . .
>
> Harry

Let's remember, the reason we are here is to enjoy the 'Q.

"Kevin S. Wilson" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 01:44:06 GMT, "Banjo" >
> wrote:
>
> >P.S: Sorry for the top-post (some folks are REALLY touchy about this), but
my newsreader is wierd.
>
> It somehow manages to disable your cursor keys?
>
> Download and install QuoteFix if you insist on reading Usenet with
> Outlook Express.
>
> http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/

There's an option in OE to put the cursor either at the top or bottom when doing
a Reply Group.

"Kevin S. Wilson" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 01:44:06 GMT, "Banjo" >
> wrote:
>
> >P.S: Sorry for the top-post (some folks are REALLY touchy about this), but
my newsreader is wierd.
>
> It somehow manages to disable your cursor keys?
>
> Download and install QuoteFix if you insist on reading Usenet with
> Outlook Express.
>
> http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/

There's an option in OE to put the cursor either at the top or bottom when doing
a Reply Group.

"TFM®" > wrote in message
. ..
> Frank Mancuso wrote:
> > I think an 8lb Chicken qualifies as a roaster, and is probably too
> > big. They tend to be tougher than a boot.
>
>
>
> Bingo!
>
>
> TFM®

Eggzactly. The one exception to a low n slow cook for poultry and a brine would
help. But then again, maybe not.

"TFM®" > wrote in message
. ..
> Frank Mancuso wrote:
> > I think an 8lb Chicken qualifies as a roaster, and is probably too
> > big. They tend to be tougher than a boot.
>
>
>
> Bingo!
>
>
> TFM®

Eggzactly. The one exception to a low n slow cook for poultry and a brine would
help. But then again, maybe not.