Here's a brand new thread for all of you who just want to fight with Kevin.
Go ahead, post here and that way the rest of us will know that we don't have
to read this thread. No politics allowed, just name-calling and babytalk.
There's another new thread for just politics.

Jack Curry

Your post should more appropriately come from those of us who place you and
kevie on the same park bench, bitching, ****ing and moaning into the night
about things other than cooking outdoors. Bugg could be included, but he's
washing dishes.

"Jack Curry" <Jack > wrote in message
...
> Here's a brand new thread for all of you who just want to fight with
> Kevin.
> Go ahead, post here and that way the rest of us will know that we don't
> have
> to read this thread. No politics allowed, just name-calling and babytalk.
> There's another new thread for just politics.
>
> Jack Curry
>
>

Your post should more appropriately come from those of us who place you and
kevie on the same park bench, bitching, ****ing and moaning into the night
about things other than cooking outdoors. Bugg could be included, but he's
washing dishes.

"Jack Curry" <Jack > wrote in message
...
> Here's a brand new thread for all of you who just want to fight with
> Kevin.
> Go ahead, post here and that way the rest of us will know that we don't
> have
> to read this thread. No politics allowed, just name-calling and babytalk.
> There's another new thread for just politics.
>
> Jack Curry
>
>

"Jack Curry" <Jack > wrote in message
...
> Here's a brand new thread for all of you who just want to fight with
Kevin.
> Go ahead, post here and that way the rest of us will know that we don't
have
> to read this thread. No politics allowed, just name-calling and babytalk.
> There's another new thread for just politics.
>
> Jack Curry
>
>

Kevin who?

"Kent" > wrote in message
> Your post should more appropriately come from those of us

You think you're a royal again Kent? Please, who exactly do you think agrees
with anything you post here?

(I'm sure being delusional is better than your alternatives, don't blame you
a bit for not facing reality you poor *******.)


D
--

Jack Curry wrote:
> Here's a brand new thread for all of you who just want to fight with Kevin.
> Go ahead, post here and that way the rest of us will know that we don't have
> to read this thread. No politics allowed, just name-calling and babytalk.
> There's another new thread for just politics.
>
> Jack Curry
>
>


Thanks for yet another thread to be added to my ignore list!

nib wrote:

> Jack Curry wrote:
>
>> Here's a brand new thread for all of you who just want to fight with
>> Kevin.
>> Go ahead, post here and that way the rest of us will know that we
>> don't have
>> to read this thread. No politics allowed, just name-calling and
>> babytalk.
>> There's another new thread for just politics.
>>
>> Jack Curry
>>
>>
>
>
> Thanks for yet another thread to be added to my ignore list!

TWTFP.

Matthew

Jack Curry wrote:
> Here's a brand new thread for all of you who just want to fight with
> Kevin. Go ahead, post here and that way the rest of us will know that
> we don't have to read this thread. No politics allowed, just
> name-calling and babytalk. There's another new thread for just
> politics.
>
> Jack Curry

I'm sorry, I mussta missed somethin. Did we need *another* one of those?

--
Fosco Gamgee Whitfurrows
and his 6" boner

Du-whop you should have been included with Kevie, Curry, and Bugg on
that same pedestal, a quartet of angelic inferior orifices,
pontificating for the presumed benefit of us all who just don't
understand.

Duwop wrote:
>
> "Kent" > wrote in message
> > Your post should more appropriately come from those of us
>
> You think you're a royal again Kent? Please, who exactly do you think agrees
> with anything you post here?
>
> (I'm sure being delusional is better than your alternatives, don't blame you
> a bit for not facing reality you poor *******.)
>
> D
> --
>

Du-whop you should have been included with Kevie, Curry, and Bugg on
that same pedestal, a quartet of angelic inferior orifices,
pontificating for the presumed benefit of us all who just don't
understand.

Duwop wrote:
>
> "Kent" > wrote in message
> > Your post should more appropriately come from those of us
>
> You think you're a royal again Kent? Please, who exactly do you think agrees
> with anything you post here?
>
> (I'm sure being delusional is better than your alternatives, don't blame you
> a bit for not facing reality you poor *******.)
>
> D
> --
>