Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Barbecue (alt.food.barbecue) Discuss barbecue and grilling--southern style "low and slow" smoking of ribs, shoulders and briskets, as well as direct heat grilling of everything from burgers to salmon to vegetables. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ran into this while surfing cooker sites. This cut seems to evaded for
the most part a presence on afb. Anybody ever try one of these monsters? Also looks like a nice alternative to the usual gang of four. The method described indicates the writer knows what they're doing. http://www.peoriacustomcookers.com/n...chuckroll.html Pierre Who doesn't work there. |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pierre wrote:
> Ran into this while surfing cooker sites. This cut seems to evaded for > the most part a presence on afb. Anybody ever try one of these > monsters? Also looks like a nice alternative to the usual gang of > four. > > > The method described indicates the writer knows what they're doing. > > http://www.peoriacustomcookers.com/n...chuckroll.html > > Pierre > Who doesn't work there. > The chuck rolls I get run around 20 lbs. I almost always cut them in half and freeze one piece, cook the other. Works great. I think that's one of the reasons it's not a real popular cut... people think they need to cook the whole thing at once. At 50% shrinkage, you end up with 10 lbs of meat. -- Reg |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pierre wrote:
> Ran into this while surfing cooker sites. This cut seems to evaded > for the most part a presence on afb. Anybody ever try one of these > monsters? Also looks like a nice alternative to the usual gang of > four. > > > The method described indicates the writer knows what they're doing. > > http://www.peoriacustomcookers.com/n...chuckroll.html > > Pierre > Who doesn't work there. Well they are only 9 miles from me so I will have to go check them out. They really slipped under my radar. I guess that I have been looking for terrorist and tornados too much. -- Master Chef Richard Campbell 100% Delightfully Evil for Your Protection I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it. --Dogbert |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg wrote:
> Pierre wrote: > > > Ran into this while surfing cooker sites. This cut seems to evaded > > for the most part a presence on afb. Anybody ever try one of these > > monsters? Also looks like a nice alternative to the usual gang of > > four. > > > > > > The method described indicates the writer knows what they're doing. > > > > http://www.peoriacustomcookers.com/n...chuckroll.html > > > The chuck rolls I get run around 20 lbs. I almost always cut > them in half and freeze one piece, cook the other. Works > great. > > I think that's one of the reasons it's not a real popular > cut... people think they need to cook the whole thing at once. > At 50% shrinkage, you end up with 10 lbs of meat. Is that a boneless cut? I think it is from reading the following site, but I'm not sure. <http://www.beeffoodservice.com/Cuts/Info.aspx?Code=15> I also didn't seem any mention of bone in the site Pierre mentioned. Brian -- If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who won't shut up. -- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com) |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Default User wrote:
> Reg wrote: > > >>The chuck rolls I get run around 20 lbs. I almost always cut >>them in half and freeze one piece, cook the other. Works >>great. >> >>I think that's one of the reasons it's not a real popular >>cut... people think they need to cook the whole thing at once. >>At 50% shrinkage, you end up with 10 lbs of meat. > > > Is that a boneless cut? > > I think it is from reading the following site, but I'm not sure. > > <http://www.beeffoodservice.com/Cuts/Info.aspx?Code=15> > > I also didn't seem any mention of bone in the site Pierre mentioned. Yup, it's boneless. Ask for an NAMP #116A <http://www.beeffoodservice.com/Cuts/Info.aspx?Code=15> -- Reg |
Posted to alt.food.barbecue
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Wertz wrote:
> On Fri, 05 May 2006 00:54:41 GMT, Reg wrote: > > >>Yup, it's boneless. Ask for an NAMP #116A >> >><http://www.beeffoodservice.com/Cuts/Info.aspx?Code=15> > > > I didn't realize a whole chuck eye roll (#116D) weighed 8-14lbs. A bit more, where I get them. They run 18-20. > I like that cut for cooking med-rare, but they never separate it > here in TX that I've seen. Yes! Parts of rib end are relatively tender and can be cooked medium rare. The rest gets smoked till pullable, or braised. -- Reg |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
"TWO BUCK" CHUCK AT FOOD-4-LESS | General Cooking | |||
Opinion Piece on the "Global Food Chain" | General Cooking | |||
Used some of the end piece of the pork "butt" | General Cooking | |||
What are your favorite cookbooks? "The Joy of Cooking", "The Way to Cook"? | General Cooking |