BOB wrote:
> Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
> :: On Mon, 15 May 2006 18:01:28 -0400, " BOB" > wrote:
> ::
> ::: Exactly. Barry's just mad because he didn't read the rules
> *before*
> ::: he sent in his money and entry form.
> ::
> :: You just keep on twisting his words, Boob, and keep on digging that
> :: hole you've gotten yourself in. He's "mad," huh? And you know this
> :: how? Certainly not from what he posted, which was calm and
> reasonable.
> :: It also contained no mention of money, though you keep trying to
> make
> :: it seem as if money is some sort of issue here.
> ::
> :: Do you really think that if you keep saying the same thing over and
> :: over it will somehow come true? Some of us are paying attention,
> you
> :: know.
>
> Yep. An you are just ****ed because I'm using techniques that you
> thought that you had patent rights to.
>
> LOL @ mr potato head
>
> BOB
>
>

That's Mr. Squinty Eyes. Get it right.

" BOB" > wrote in news:1v7ag.38272$QU3.35837
@bignews8.bellsouth.net:

> BOB
> who is now finished with you in this thread

One can only hope.

"Denny Wheeler" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 12 May 2006 19:40:59 -0700, "Dave Bugg" >
> wrote:
>
>>Pierre wrote:
>>
>>> (The silicon ones are the way to go, easy to clean too.)
>>
>>Thanks for the tip, Pierre. I've been wondering if they would hold sauce
>>the
>>way a typical bristle brush will.
>
> I have one silicone brush and I love it. I'll be buying more, and
> other cooking utensils also.
>
Silicon brushes are very good---so are the silicone spatulas but got some
silicon bakeware for Xmas and it sucks royally!!

Buzz

On Mon, 15 May 2006 19:02:48 -0400, " BOB" > wrote:

>Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
>:: On Mon, 15 May 2006 18:01:28 -0400, " BOB" > wrote:
>::
>::: Exactly. Barry's just mad because he didn't read the rules
>*before*
>::: he sent in his money and entry form.
>::
>:: You just keep on twisting his words, Boob, and keep on digging that
>:: hole you've gotten yourself in. He's "mad," huh? And you know this
>:: how? Certainly not from what he posted, which was calm and
>reasonable.
>:: It also contained no mention of money, though you keep trying to
>make
>:: it seem as if money is some sort of issue here.
>::
>:: Do you really think that if you keep saying the same thing over and
>:: over it will somehow come true? Some of us are paying attention,
>you
>:: know.
>
>Yep. An you are just ****ed because I'm using techniques that you
>thought that you had patent rights to.
>
So we've established, by your own admission, that you have been
intellectually dishonest to a point that borders on lying. Thanks for
clearing that up.

Anything else I can help you with? Like maybe teach you how to quote
properly so that the quoted material doesn't look like a train wreck?

On Mon, 15 May 2006 18:54:28 -0500, Steve Wertz
> wrote:

>On Mon, 15 May 2006 18:26:32 -0400, BOB wrote:
>
>> LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>
>> Coming from
>> YOU??????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????
>>
>> The biggest troll and crossposter in this
>> newsgroup?????????????????????????????
>>
>> Probably the most kil-filtered person (?) in this
>> newsgroup?????????????????????????????????
>>
>> ROTFLPIMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>I was admiring the way you got Kevin to hump your leg in this
>thread. 3 times, even.

Weren't you explaining just the other day that when people post
messages, it's with the expectation that people will follow up to
those messages? And that replying to messages is indicative of nothing
other than the expected use of the Usernet? I could look it up for
you, Swertz, since you obviously haven't been paying attention.

"Leg-humping." How original. Or did you plagiarize that from someone?

On Tue, 16 May 2006 02:55:18 +0000 (UTC), Barry Bean
> wrote:

>" BOB" > wrote in news:1v7ag.38272$QU3.35837
:
>
>> BOB
>> who is now finished with you in this thread
>
>One can only hope.

Don't get your hopes up. He lies about other things, too --
f'rinstance, like when he said that you got disqualified for violating
cook-off rules.

It also would be about the elevensquillionth time that he has huffily
announced that he is THROUGH with a thread, only to pop up a short
time later.

On Tue, 16 May 2006 05:47:21 -0500, "2fatbbq" >
wrote:

>Silicon brushes are very good---so are the silicone spatulas

Dunno if they're silicone, but I have some high-temp spatulas that are
practically indestructible.

>but got some
>silicon bakeware for Xmas and it sucks royally!!

I hope there's a special corner of hell waiting for the people who
helped popularize "sucks" as a catch-all phrase meaning "Me no like."

What kind of bakeware? In what way did the bakeware fail to perform to
your expectations or seemed deficient in comparison to other bakeware.

You know, like, how did they, like, suck and stuff?

Kevin S. Wilson > wrote in
:

>>> BOB
>>> who is now finished with you in this thread
>>
>>One can only hope.
>
> Don't get your hopes up.

Sometimes hope is all you have.

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
:: Anything else I can help you with?

Teach everyone here how to stay out of any newsgroup if you can't post
ON topic?

Oh, I forgot. You can't do that.

BOB


--
Raw Meat Should NOT Have An Ingredients List

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
:: Anything else I can help you with? Like maybe teach you how to
quote
:: properly so that the quoted material doesn't look like a train
wreck?


Look again. It's all quoted properly. I did omit the trimming
because I know that untrimmed posts make you foam at the mouth.

BOB


--
Raw Meat Should NOT Have An Ingredients List

Steve Wertz wrote:
:: I was admiring the way you got Kevin to hump your leg in this
:: thread. 3 times, even.
::
:: I'd get those pants washed if I were you. Might want to use some
:: of that K-9 deterrent and deodorizer on them, too.

Those pants are history. I put 'em in the trash, and the truck took
'em this morning.

BOB

--
Raw Meat Should NOT Have An Ingredients List

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
::
:: Don't get your hopes up. He lies about other things, too --
:: f'rinstance, like when he said that you got disqualified for
violating
:: cook-off rules.

Uh huh. Where did I say that? I asked if that's what happened once
and implied that since he kept complaining about a rule (that he
agreed to play by) it was probably true.

You need to re-take those classes on reading for comprehension.

::
:: It also would be about the elevensquillionth time that he has
huffily
:: announced that he is THROUGH with a thread, only to pop up a short
:: time later.

You are so full of yourself (and full of shit). Please quote us more
than twice. I think that you have me cornfused with someone else.

BOB



--
Raw Meat Should NOT Have An Ingredients List

Barry Bean wrote:

On Tue, 16 May 2006 16:34:15 -0400, " BOB" > wrote:

>Steve Wertz wrote:
>:: I was admiring the way you got Kevin to hump your leg in this
>:: thread. 3 times, even.
>::
>:: I'd get those pants washed if I were you. Might want to use some
>:: of that K-9 deterrent and deodorizer on them, too.
>
>Those pants are history. I put 'em in the trash, and the truck took
>'em this morning.
>
I see. So you must subscribe to Swertz's assertion that following up
three times to the same person in the same thread is leg-humping.

Got it.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to read your fourth follow-up to me
in this thread.

(Do you people even TRY to remember what you've said just hours ago?)

Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
::
:: (Do you people even TRY to remember what you've said just hours
ago?)

Do you even CARE if you post ON topic in any newsgroup?

BOB


--
Raw Meat Should NOT Have An Ingredients List

On Tue, 16 May 2006 17:12:55 -0400, " BOB" > wrote:

>Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
>::
>:: (Do you people even TRY to remember what you've said just hours
>ago?)
>
>Do you even CARE if you post ON topic in any newsgroup?
>
Not particularly, no. This is alt., after all. Besides, the notion of
topicality went flying out the window years ago, when you and the rest
of the ladies' knitting circle ran out of things to say about Q and
decided to talk about the weather instead.

PS: Those of us paying attention do realize that you snipped out the
part of my post that made you look stupid. You can stop with the
hand-waving now; you're only fooling the dullards.

"Kevin S. Wilson" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 16 May 2006 17:12:55 -0400, " BOB" > wrote:
>
> >Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
> >::
> >:: (Do you people even TRY to remember what you've said just hours
> >ago?)
> >
> >Do you even CARE if you post ON topic in any newsgroup?
> >
> Not particularly, no. This is alt., after all. Besides, the notion of
> topicality went flying out the window years ago, when you and the rest
> of the ladies' knitting circle ran out of things to say about Q and
> decided to talk about the weather instead.

It's 86* and sunny here.
Jack

" BOB" > wrote in news:2Pqag.45552$iB2.10656
@bignews4.bellsouth.net:

> Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
>::
>:: Don't get your hopes up. He lies about other things, too --
>:: f'rinstance, like when he said that you got disqualified for
> violating
>:: cook-off rules.
>
> Uh huh. Where did I say that? I asked if that's what happened once
> and implied that since he kept complaining about a rule (that he
> agreed to play by) it was probably true.


Hey Bob! You still beatin' your wife?

On Tue, 16 May 2006 22:01:44 +0000 (UTC), Barry Bean
> wrote:

>" BOB" > wrote in news:2Pqag.45552$iB2.10656
:
>
>> Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
>>::
>>:: Don't get your hopes up. He lies about other things, too --
>>:: f'rinstance, like when he said that you got disqualified for
>> violating
>>:: cook-off rules.
>>
>> Uh huh. Where did I say that? I asked if that's what happened once
>> and implied that since he kept complaining about a rule (that he
>> agreed to play by) it was probably true.
>
>
>Hey Bob! You still beatin' your wife?
>
<snork!>

Nice try, but logic ain't his strong suit, and he can't even spell
"subtlety," much less recognize it. Besides, he already admitted that
he purposely misrepresented what you said.

Part of the boy's problem is that he thinks everyone else has as short
an attention spam as he has. Hell, he needs google just to keep his
own lies straight from morning to afternoon.

"Jack Sloan" > wrote in message
news:bWrag.6856$UY6.58@trnddc08...
>
> "Kevin S. Wilson" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Tue, 16 May 2006 17:12:55 -0400, " BOB" > wrote:
>>
>> >Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
>> >::
>> >:: (Do you people even TRY to remember what you've said just hours
>> >ago?)
>> >
>> >Do you even CARE if you post ON topic in any newsgroup?
>> >
>> Not particularly, no. This is alt., after all. Besides, the notion of
>> topicality went flying out the window years ago, when you and the rest
>> of the ladies' knitting circle ran out of things to say about Q and
>> decided to talk about the weather instead.
>
> It's 86* and sunny here.
> Jack
>

-- 68°? and sunny here in North Flourdough, Jack
James A. "Big Jim" Whitten

www.lazyq.com

>

Barry Bean wrote:
> Hey Bob! You still beatin' your wife?

Until now, I thought you were perhaps a misguided soul. But with this
statement, BOB's call is confirmed; you are a troll and more than
likely one of Kevvie's sock puppets. Welcome to my killfile. You can
check out anytime ya want but ya can never leave.

--
-frohe
Life is too short to be in a hurry

Big Jim wrote:
> "Jack Sloan" > wrote in message
> news:bWrag.6856$UY6.58@trnddc08...
>
>>"Kevin S. Wilson" > wrote in message
. ..
>>
>>>On Tue, 16 May 2006 17:12:55 -0400, " BOB" > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
>>>>::
>>>>:: (Do you people even TRY to remember what you've said just hours
>>>>ago?)
>>>>
>>>>Do you even CARE if you post ON topic in any newsgroup?
>>>>
>>>
>>>Not particularly, no. This is alt., after all. Besides, the notion of
>>>topicality went flying out the window years ago, when you and the rest
>>>of the ladies' knitting circle ran out of things to say about Q and
>>>decided to talk about the weather instead.
>>
>>It's 86* and sunny here.
>>Jack
>>
>
>
> -- 68°? and sunny here in North Flourdough, Jack
> James A. "Big Jim" Whitten
>
> www.lazyq.com
>
Cool 71º at the moment! They're callin' for more rain tommorow...

Big Jim wrote:

> -- 68°? and sunny here in North Flourdough, Jack

It got a crispy 97F here in Wenatchee. But it's a "dry" heat ;-) Wet or
dry, hot is hot!!!
--
Dave
www.davebbq.com

"Dan Krueger" > wrote in message
ink.net...

> Cool 71º at the moment! They're callin' for more rain tommorow...

-And right now this morning it is a balmy 48°- Gonna be working on BBQ pits
today
James A. "Big Jim" Whitten

www.lazyq.com

On Tue, 16 May 2006 23:23:25 -0500, Steve Wertz
> wrote:

>On Tue, 16 May 2006 16:26:42 -0500, 2fatbbq wrote:
>
>> "Kevin S. Wilson" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Tue, 16 May 2006 05:47:21 -0500, "2fatbbq" >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Silicon brushes are very good---so are the silicone spatulas
>>>
>>> Dunno if they're silicone, but I have some high-temp spatulas that are
>>> practically indestructible.
>>>
>>>>but got some
>>>>silicon bakeware for Xmas and it sucks royally!!
>>>
>>> What kind of bakeware? In what way did the bakeware fail to perform to
>>> your expectations or seemed deficient in comparison to other bakeware.
>>>
>>> You know, like, how did they, like, suck and stuff?
>>
>> disregarding the language lesson the silicon bakeware is flimsy, fails to
>> hold shape without foundation(like wife<sf>) and the bread pans don't even
>> like to release the bread!! In other words sucks royally!!
>
>Don't even bother answering Kevin's superficial questions. He's
>obviously never used any sort of silicon bakeware. He just wants
>to see if anybody would bother answering his questions anymore.
>
Control-freak much, Swertz?

Let's see now:

1. Off-topic posts BAD.
2. On-topic posts BAD, unless preapproved by Swertz.

That about sum it up, putz?

On Tue, 16 May 2006 23:25:27 -0500, Steve Wertz
> wrote:

>On Tue, 16 May 2006 14:56:02 -0600, Kevin S. Wilson wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 16 May 2006 16:34:15 -0400, " BOB" > wrote:
>>
>>>Steve Wertz wrote:
>>>:: I was admiring the way you got Kevin to hump your leg in this
>>>:: thread. 3 times, even.
>>>::
>>>:: I'd get those pants washed if I were you. Might want to use some
>>>:: of that K-9 deterrent and deodorizer on them, too.
>>>
>>>Those pants are history. I put 'em in the trash, and the truck took
>>>'em this morning.
>>>
>> I see. So you must subscribe to Swertz's assertion that following up
>> three times to the same person in the same thread is leg-humping.
>>
>> Got it.
>>
>> Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to read your fourth follow-up to me
>> in this thread.
>
>Clue: those were *unprovoked* follow-ups. Stop your persistent
>crying and spread those lips wide.
>
Ah, more from the Terry Autism School of Debate.

1. Deny your own words.
2. Change the terms of debate.
3. Revert to so-called "insults" about homosexuality and fellatio.

So very, very sad.

On Wed, 17 May 2006 07:42:26 -0400, "Big Jim" >
wrote:

>
>"Dan Krueger" > wrote in message
link.net...
>
>> Cool 71º at the moment! They're callin' for more rain tommorow...
>
>-And right now this morning it is a balmy 48°- Gonna be working on BBQ pits
>today
>James A. "Big Jim" Whitten

>www.lazyq.com
>
It hit 95F here in Vache3ville today - present temp is 68F [almost 11
Pee-Emm] and I did prime rib beef ribs on the baby K for supper.

Harry

What it is, this "rain"?

On Tue, 16 May 2006 22:25:00 GMT, "frohe" >
wrote:

>Barry Bean wrote:
>> Hey Bob! You still beatin' your wife?
>
>Until now, I thought you were perhaps a misguided soul. But with this
>statement, BOB's call is confirmed; you are a troll and more than
>likely one of Kevvie's sock puppets.
^^^^^^^^^^^^

You don't really understand what that term means, do you?

"Barry Bean" > wrote in message
> Kevin S. Wilson > wrote in
>
> > Consider the source.
>
> Thanks. I'll try to do a better job of that in the future.


Barry, you really, really should consider the source. Give yourself an idea
just how distasteful a person KSW and google Frohe's posting history. You'll
look very long and hard to find a cross word. He just got in Kevvie's sights
and Kev acted out like the child he is. He really is shameless.

Then again, I'd be bitter in his shoes too. Poor SOB.


--

"Barry Bean" >

> and puts words in my mouth,

That was KSW who did that, and gullible you, already being mad at BOB
believed it. (Sounds like how we got in Iraq)

>but if I have the audacity to suggest that he's
> doing so, *I'm* the bad guy. Thanks for clearing that up.

Before you got sidetracked by KEVIN I had the idea you were maybe a bit
pompous but basically allright (hey we're all assholes here, it's ok). BOB
came on a little too strong to start with sure, and you seemed to take it in
stride.

Chill. And stop listening to the shit stirrer and think for your own goddamn
self. How old are you anyway to be so easily influenced?



--