Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Beer (rec.drink.beer) Discussing various aspects of that fine beverage referred to as beer. Including interesting beers and beer styles, opinions on tastes and ingredients, reviews of brewpubs and breweries & suggestions about where to shop. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Now they have to buy someone else out ...
http://beeradvocate.com/forum/read.php?thread=570909 -- -- Jason Alstrom -- BeerAdvocate.com New England Beer Fest - October 29th 2005 http://beeradvocate.com/fests/ -- |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
J. Alstrom wrote:
> Now they have to buy someone else out ... > > http://beeradvocate.com/forum/read.php?thread=570909 Quoted from the original source in <http://stlouis.bizjournals.com/stlouis/stories/2005/10/03/daily66.html>: "More than 98 percent of London-based SABMiller's shareholders approved the deal, which makes SABMiller the world's second-largest brewer behind Belgium's InBev, and bumps St. Louis-based Anheuser-Busch Cos. Inc. to third place." So, there are at least a couple of ways to measure "largest." One is by financial turnover; the other is by volume of production. The SLBJ article seems to rank the megabrewers on production volume, rather than financial turnover; I recall that A-B still held the edge over InBev in that regard. What's the situation now? Any sources out there to clarify? Earth to Lew: got some numbers for us? -- dgs |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"dgs" > wrote in message
... > J. Alstrom wrote: >> Now they have to buy someone else out ... >> http://beeradvocate.com/forum/read.php?thread=570909 > > Quoted from the original source in > <http://stlouis.bizjournals.com/stlouis/stories/2005/10/03/daily66.html>: > > "More than 98 percent of London-based SABMiller's shareholders approved > the deal, which makes SABMiller the world's second-largest brewer behind > Belgium's InBev, and bumps St. Louis-based Anheuser-Busch Cos. Inc. to > third place." > > So, there are at least a couple of ways to measure "largest." One is by > financial turnover; the other is by volume of production. The SLBJ > article seems to rank the megabrewers on production volume, rather than > financial turnover; I recall that A-B still held the edge over InBev in > that regard. What's the situation now? Any sources out there to > clarify? Earth to Lew: got some numbers for us? A-B still had the edge on InBev in sales by dollars/money due to its large position in the U.S. market, a market InBev has taken direct aim at. They're launching Brahma here in a big way, very soon: test-marketing has already begun. But where this puts SAB/Miller...dunno. They've obviously got a big U.S. position as well. But margins in Europe are shockingly low, and I doubt anyone would be shocked by how low Latin American margins are. Sorry, nothing hard at this point. -- Lew Bryson "As for talking shit in this NG, Lew, you're the undisputed king, and that's no SHITE." -- Bob Skilnik, 1/31/02 www.lewbryson.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Anheuser-Busch | General Cooking | |||
Anheuser-Busch InBev | Beer | |||
Anheuser-Busch InBev | Beer | |||
Anheuser-Busch's Beach Bum Blonde Ale Makes a Splash with Beer Lovers | Beer | |||
Anheuser-Busch To Offer Buckeye Brew (Arrgh! - GH) | General |