Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Beer (rec.drink.beer) Discussing various aspects of that fine beverage referred to as beer. Including interesting beers and beer styles, opinions on tastes and ingredients, reviews of brewpubs and breweries & suggestions about where to shop. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.drink.beer
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Experts see hope for Iron City's survival
Friday, December 09, 2005 By Len Boselovic, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Pittsburgh Brewing may be bankrupt, but it still has a brand name that could put it back on its feet, beer industry and marketing experts said yesterday. "It's a classic microbrewery masquerading as a big brewery," said Mark H. Rodman of Beverage Distribution Consultants of Boston. "I would be absolutely amazed if there isn't a white knight ready to rescue this operation." Many regional brewers have been muscled out of the market in recent years, squeezed between large national and international brewers and fast-growing microbreweries. A few of the victims have found a way to compete and Pittsburgh Brewing, which filed for bankruptcy protection Wednesday, may be able to do the same, according to Mr. Rodman and others. Pittsburgh Brewing Vice Chairman Joseph Piccirilli said he intends to keep current management in place and possibly solicit new investors rather than sell the company. Mr. Rodman and others said there are several ways the 144-year-old, 200-employee Lawrenceville brewer could reorganize. One option is to become a "virtual" brewer: contract someone else to brew Iron City and its other brands, leaving Pittsburgh Brewing the job of marketing and distributing the beer. There is plenty of excess capacity in the industry to make that possible, although that might hurt its appeal in its hometown market, the industry sources said. The model worked for Pabst, once a major national brewer that's found new life by having SABMiller brew its beer. "Pabst has managed to do something with Blue Ribbon. Oddly, after they closed the brewery, it attracted some appeal," said Peter Reid, editor of Modern Brewing Age, a trade publication. That option would eliminate more jobs than others. One model for preserving jobs is offered by City Brewing in La Crosse, Wis. When Stroh's shut down the former G. Heileman Brewing Co. plant in that city, its managers enlisted investors who helped them reopen the brewery, even though they did not own Heileman or other branded beers. City Brewing began operations in November 2000 with about 35 employees. Today, it employs between 250 and 300 and produces 1.8 million barrels annually, said brewmaster Randy Hughes. City Brewing's own beers account for only 2 percent of production. The rest comes from contract brewing. The company makes Smirnoff Ice, Mike's Hard Lemonade, Arizona Teas and energy drinks. "We're fortunate. It's been tough," Mr. Hughes said. "You have to be open to be doing contract volume." Unlike City Brewing, Pittsburgh Brewing has branded products that some brewer may want to add to its portfolio, said Peter Boatwright, a Carnegie Mellon University marketing professor. "Branding in the beer industry is extremely important," Mr. Boatwright said. "When people are buying beer, it's not simply the taste of the liquid they're buying. They're getting emotion and image in addition to the content of the bottle." Aluminum bottles introduced by Pittsburgh Brewing in 2004 have added to the value of the brand. "Iron City is a brand that has some cache, some equity," Mr. Reid said. "Of all these kinds of defunct brands, Iron City might travel better than some." The major obstacle to any plan to continue brewing Iron City -- or anything else -- at the Lawrenceville plant is its condition. Much of the equipment is out of date and maintenance has suffered through more than a decade of financial troubles. "You'd have to literally rebuild the brewery," Mr. Rodman said. "There's no way that facility can match up with other plants." Some of the cost could be covered by reducing other costs, including terminating a pension plan facing a deficit of more than $6 million. Pittsburgh Brewing wants the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp, the federal agency that insures pension benefits, to take over the plan. Other concessions could come from renegotiating a five-year labor agreement ratified in June. The legacy of financial problems, poor equipment and ill will over the $2.5 million in unpaid water and sewer bills that triggered the bankruptcy are major obstacles for Pittsburgh Brewing. But industry and marketing experts said the brewery still stands a chance because of regional loyalty to the brand. "If they can get enough local support and keep workers together, maybe they can make it happen," Mr. Hughes said. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (Len Boselovic can be reached at or 412-263-1941.) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Iron City To Brew Last Batch In Lawrenceville | Beer | |||
Iron City outsources canned beer | Beer | |||
Iron City to revive dormant brands | Beer | |||
Is this the end of Iron City?? | Beer | |||
i want to buy iron city beer ! | Beer |