Chocolate (rec.food.chocolate) all topics related to eating and making chocolate such as cooking techniques, recipes, history, folklore & source recommendations.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to misc.health.alternative,sci.med.nutrition,rec.food.chocolate
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Chocolate DEBUNKED !!!

Its good for you, thens its NOT good for you! Heck, a little bit wont
do anyone harm!


On Apr 25, 5:17 pm, Mark Thorson > wrote:
> Bad news for chocolate. Raises heart rate,
> otherwise nothing. :-(
>
> Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Apr;87(4):872-80.
> A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized
> trial of the effects of dark chocolate and cocoa
> on variables associated with neuropsychological
> functioning and cardiovascular health: clinical
> findings from a sample of healthy, cognitively
> intact older adults.
> Crews WD Jr, Harrison DW, Wright JW.
> Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
> University, Blacksburg, VA 24506, USA.
>
> BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been
> increased interest in the potential health-
> related benefits of antioxidant- and
> phytochemical-rich dark chocolate and cocoa.
>
> OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to
> examine the short-term (6 wk) effects of dark
> chocolate and cocoa on variables associated
> with neuropsychological functioning and
> cardiovascular health in healthy older adults.
>
> DESIGN: A double-blind, placebo-controlled,
> fixed-dose, parallel-group clinical trial was
> used. Participants (n = 101) were randomly
> assigned to receive a 37-g dark chocolate bar
> and 8 ounces (237 mL) of an artificially
> sweetened cocoa beverage or similar placebo
> products each day for 6 wk.
>
> RESULTS: No significant group (dark chocolate
> and cocoa or placebo)-by-trial (baseline,
> midpoint, and end-of-treatment assessments)
> interactions were found for the
> neuropsychological, hematological, or blood
> pressure variables examined. In contrast, the
> midpoint and end-of-treatment mean pulse rate
> assessments in the dark chocolate and cocoa
> group were significantly higher than those
> at baseline and significantly higher than
> the midpoint and end-of-treatment rates in
> the control group. Results of a follow-up
> questionnaire item on the treatment products
> that participants believed they had consumed
> during the trial showed that more than half
> of the participants in both groups correctly
> identified the products that they had
> ingested during the experiment.
>
> CONCLUSIONS: This investigation failed to
> support the predicted beneficial effects
> of short-term dark chocolate and cocoa
> consumption on any of the neuropsychological
> or cardiovascular health-related variables
> included in this research. Consumption of
> dark chocolate and cocoa was, however,
> associated with significantly higher pulse
> rates at 3- and 6-wk treatment assessments.


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bean myth debunked notbob General Cooking 48 09-02-2013 04:08 PM
Guilt-free eating: 10 nutrition myths debunked Joe[_22_] General Cooking 0 01-05-2010 06:37 PM
Five Immigration Myths Debunked arminius General Cooking 0 11-06-2006 03:22 PM
Low fat diet debunked! Phil Mitchell General Cooking 6 08-02-2006 08:10 PM
Some kitchen cutlery myths debunked. Fred Cooking Equipment 8 21-05-2004 02:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FoodBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Food and drink"