In article >,
Peter T. Daniels > wrote:
>Matthew Fields wrote:
>>
>> In article >,
>> Peter T. Daniels > wrote:
>>
>> >They're all just so inherently implausible -- kind of like, How did the
>> >eye evolve?
>> >--
>> >Peter T. Daniels
>>
>> Ever seen planaria flatworms? or octopusses? Eyes have evolved
>> something like 8 separate times,
>
>Are you not aware that "How did the eye evolve?" is the standard
>Creationist challenge to evolutionists?
>
>Obviously both eyes evolved and butter was invented, but both processes
>got a lot of 'splainin' to do.

But at least for the eye, the explanation already exists in droves,
and the Creationist challenge hinges upon its hearer being completely
unaware of the evidence.

--
Matthew H. Fields http://personal.www.umich.edu/~fields
Music: Splendor in Sound
To be great, do things better and better. Don't wait for talent: no such thing.
Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/