Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Chocolate (rec.food.chocolate) all topics related to eating and making chocolate such as cooking techniques, recipes, history, folklore & source recommendations. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just received a block of this from Chocosphere. Very fruity, with a
cherry/almond/hazelnut profile; delicious, but idiosyncratic. I'm wondering what the other couverture blocs are like. Has anyone tried the others? Alex, any opinions? -- Regards, Dean Macinskas Email address is a spam sink - please reply to group. --- "There are three principal ways to lose money: wine, women, and engineers. While the first two are more pleasant, the third is by far the more certain." - Baron Rothschild |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guittard's couverture chocolate is excellent in my opinion. My favorite
bean-to-bar chocolatiers are Domori and Pralus, so as you can tell my chocolate standards are not low at all. In general I find our American chocolate lousy, but there are exceptions, Guittard being the most noteable. For a sweeter (61%) dark chocolate, try Guittard's Lever du Soleil - it has no overpowering flavor notes, and is quite excellent. Guittard's Coucher du Soleil is an excellent 72%. These are sold as couverture, though you can get them in 1 Kg bags of discs (not chips, but broader) from Chocosphere, who repackages the larger factory packages. Of course, health food stores sell the Guittard Bittersweet, which Alex Rast rightly raves about. Eat enough Guittard couverture and you'll be able to impress your friends when eating chocolate candy, identifying the brand and formula of couverture chocolate used in the coating. It's a shame the Guittard couverture isn't sold as bars, perhaps minus the soy lecithin for even better taste. As bars they would definitely join the ranks of Amedei, Venchi, Domori, Pralus, Chocovic, etc. in popularity. Geoff "DPM" > wrote in message news ![]() >I just received a block of this from Chocosphere. Very fruity, with a > cherry/almond/hazelnut profile; delicious, but idiosyncratic. I'm > wondering what the other couverture blocs are like. Has anyone tried the > others? Alex, any opinions? > -- > Regards, > Dean Macinskas |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guittard's couverture chocolate is excellent in my opinion. My favorite
bean-to-bar chocolatiers are Domori and Pralus, so as you can tell my chocolate standards are not low at all. In general I find our American chocolate lousy, but there are exceptions, Guittard being the most noteable. For a sweeter (61%) dark chocolate, try Guittard's Lever du Soleil - it has no overpowering flavor notes, and is quite excellent. Guittard's Coucher du Soleil is an excellent 72%. These are sold as couverture, though you can get them in 1 Kg bags of discs (not chips, but broader) from Chocosphere, who repackages the larger factory packages. Of course, health food stores sell the Guittard Bittersweet, which Alex Rast rightly raves about. Eat enough Guittard couverture and you'll be able to impress your friends when eating chocolate candy, identifying the brand and formula of couverture chocolate used in the coating. It's a shame the Guittard couverture isn't sold as bars, perhaps minus the soy lecithin for even better taste. As bars they would definitely join the ranks of Amedei, Venchi, Domori, Pralus, Chocovic, etc. in popularity. Geoff "DPM" > wrote in message news ![]() >I just received a block of this from Chocosphere. Very fruity, with a > cherry/almond/hazelnut profile; delicious, but idiosyncratic. I'm > wondering what the other couverture blocs are like. Has anyone tried the > others? Alex, any opinions? > -- > Regards, > Dean Macinskas |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
at Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:08:51 GMT in <D0kvd.3231$Z%1.2159@trnddc03>,
(DPM) wrote : >I just received a block of this from Chocosphere. Very fruity, with a >cherry/almond/hazelnut profile; delicious, but idiosyncratic. I'm >wondering what the other couverture blocs are like. Has anyone tried the >others? Alex, any opinions? Each of the varietals is different, distinctive, and generally IMHO sets the reference standard for its varietal. The Colombian is unbelievable - an exploration of subtle, floral taste in a chocolate, one of the great chocolates in the world and a perfect chocolate to pair with rosewater. This is the chocolate to buy for Valentine's Day - it's so seductive, anyone tasting it will swoon. Ecuador Nacional is powerful and bold. It's got all the Arriba signatures - blackberry, tobacco, woody, with that bitter hint characteristic of Arriba. It is excellent mixed with milk or cream - such as in a pudding or truffle. Madagascar Criollo is a study in complementary components. There's flavours of blueberry, spices, and cocoa in there, a complexity remarkable for a varietal. This is a superb chocolate for cakes, cookies, and other baked goods. Then there's the Etienne blends. Coucher du Soleil is somewhat like Sur Del Lago, but less fruity. There's an initial fruity hit, then it quickly becomes more of a cocoa/coffee flavour. There is a sharp bitterness to the finish, a characteristic that knocks it down a notch in my book. It's still quite good, though. L'Harmonie is the best of the blends. It's incredibly complex, reminding me a lot of Valrhona's Gran Couva, with elements of just about every desirable flavour component in it. However, this complexity is never jarring or confusing. It makes for a superb, yet highly characterised, general-purpose chocolate. Lever du Soleil maintains Guittard's excellence in the 60-65% class. This one is very dark and clearly contains components of the Ecuador Nacional in it - a strong chocolate at its percentage, and one where with the dark roast it receives minimises the bitterness. La Nuit Noire, however, is a complete disappointment. It just tastes very sugary, like candy. There might be hints of peach and strawberry in there, but it's pretty faint. It's just not even in the same world as the other chocolates. Then finally, there are the 2 old standbys, the traditional blends. Gourmet Bittersweet is a chocolate that, if you've read the NG in the past, you already know my opinions on. Quite simply, the best chocolate in the world. Need I say more? French Vanilla is also very, very good. No, it doesn't have the power of Gourmet bittersweet but it's a nice exercise in subtlety. The flavour has an earthy, molasses cast to it, especially appropriate for chocolate mixed with cinnamon and other such spices. There's the rundown, at least for the dark chocolates. If you'd like my opinion on the milks, as well, let me know. -- Alex Rast (remove d., .7, not, and .NOSPAM to reply) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Geoff,
Thanks for your opinions. I've already tried the Coucher du Soleil discs, and find them interesting - an almost waxy mouthfeel, with the flavor restrained at first and then building towards the finish, with a distinct banana note. I don't find any Guittard chocolate so far all that intense (like Cluizel or Amedei), but balanced and fruity. I'll probably try them all as time and money permit. Thanks, Dean "Geoffrey Bard" > wrote in message news:PLMvd.571240$D%.508148@attbi_s51... > Guittard's couverture chocolate is excellent in my opinion. My favorite > bean-to-bar chocolatiers are Domori and Pralus, so as you can tell my > chocolate standards are not low at all. In general I find our American > chocolate lousy, but there are exceptions, Guittard being the most noteable. > > For a sweeter (61%) dark chocolate, try Guittard's Lever du Soleil - it has > no overpowering flavor notes, and is quite excellent. Guittard's Coucher du > Soleil is an excellent 72%. These are sold as couverture, though you can > get them in 1 Kg bags of discs (not chips, but broader) from Chocosphere, > who repackages the larger factory packages. Of course, health food stores > sell the Guittard Bittersweet, which Alex Rast rightly raves about. Eat > enough Guittard couverture and you'll be able to impress your friends when > eating chocolate candy, identifying the brand and formula of couverture > chocolate used in the coating. > > It's a shame the Guittard couverture isn't sold as bars, perhaps minus the > soy lecithin for even better taste. As bars they would definitely join the > ranks of Amedei, Venchi, Domori, Pralus, Chocovic, etc. in popularity. > > Geoff > > "DPM" > wrote in message news ![]() > >I just received a block of this from Chocosphere. Very fruity, with a > > cherry/almond/hazelnut profile; delicious, but idiosyncratic. I'm > > wondering what the other couverture blocs are like. Has anyone tried the > > others? Alex, any opinions? > > -- > > Regards, > > Dean Macinskas > > > |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Geoff,
Thanks for your opinions. I've already tried the Coucher du Soleil discs, and find them interesting - an almost waxy mouthfeel, with the flavor restrained at first and then building towards the finish, with a distinct banana note. I don't find any Guittard chocolate so far all that intense (like Cluizel or Amedei), but balanced and fruity. I'll probably try them all as time and money permit. Thanks, Dean "Geoffrey Bard" > wrote in message news:PLMvd.571240$D%.508148@attbi_s51... > Guittard's couverture chocolate is excellent in my opinion. My favorite > bean-to-bar chocolatiers are Domori and Pralus, so as you can tell my > chocolate standards are not low at all. In general I find our American > chocolate lousy, but there are exceptions, Guittard being the most noteable. > > For a sweeter (61%) dark chocolate, try Guittard's Lever du Soleil - it has > no overpowering flavor notes, and is quite excellent. Guittard's Coucher du > Soleil is an excellent 72%. These are sold as couverture, though you can > get them in 1 Kg bags of discs (not chips, but broader) from Chocosphere, > who repackages the larger factory packages. Of course, health food stores > sell the Guittard Bittersweet, which Alex Rast rightly raves about. Eat > enough Guittard couverture and you'll be able to impress your friends when > eating chocolate candy, identifying the brand and formula of couverture > chocolate used in the coating. > > It's a shame the Guittard couverture isn't sold as bars, perhaps minus the > soy lecithin for even better taste. As bars they would definitely join the > ranks of Amedei, Venchi, Domori, Pralus, Chocovic, etc. in popularity. > > Geoff > > "DPM" > wrote in message news ![]() > >I just received a block of this from Chocosphere. Very fruity, with a > > cherry/almond/hazelnut profile; delicious, but idiosyncratic. I'm > > wondering what the other couverture blocs are like. Has anyone tried the > > others? Alex, any opinions? > > -- > > Regards, > > Dean Macinskas > > > |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Alex Rast" > wrote in message ... > at Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:08:51 GMT in <D0kvd.3231$Z%1.2159@trnddc03>, > (DPM) wrote : > > >I just received a block of this from Chocosphere. Very fruity, with a > >cherry/almond/hazelnut profile; delicious, but idiosyncratic. I'm > >wondering what the other couverture blocs are like. Has anyone tried the > >others? Alex, any opinions? > > Each of the varietals is different, distinctive, and generally IMHO sets > the reference standard for its varietal. > > The Colombian is unbelievable - an exploration of subtle, floral taste in a > chocolate, one of the great chocolates in the world and a perfect chocolate > to pair with rosewater. This is the chocolate to buy for Valentine's Day - > it's so seductive, anyone tasting it will swoon. > > Ecuador Nacional is powerful and bold. It's got all the Arriba signatures - > blackberry, tobacco, woody, with that bitter hint characteristic of Arriba. > It is excellent mixed with milk or cream - such as in a pudding or truffle. > > Madagascar Criollo is a study in complementary components. There's flavours > of blueberry, spices, and cocoa in there, a complexity remarkable for a > varietal. This is a superb chocolate for cakes, cookies, and other baked > goods. > > Then there's the Etienne blends. > > Coucher du Soleil is somewhat like Sur Del Lago, but less fruity. There's > an initial fruity hit, then it quickly becomes more of a cocoa/coffee > flavour. There is a sharp bitterness to the finish, a characteristic that > knocks it down a notch in my book. It's still quite good, though. > > L'Harmonie is the best of the blends. It's incredibly complex, reminding me > a lot of Valrhona's Gran Couva, with elements of just about every desirable > flavour component in it. However, this complexity is never jarring or > confusing. It makes for a superb, yet highly characterised, general-purpose > chocolate. > > Lever du Soleil maintains Guittard's excellence in the 60-65% class. This > one is very dark and clearly contains components of the Ecuador Nacional in > it - a strong chocolate at its percentage, and one where with the dark > roast it receives minimises the bitterness. > > La Nuit Noire, however, is a complete disappointment. It just tastes very > sugary, like candy. There might be hints of peach and strawberry in there, > but it's pretty faint. It's just not even in the same world as the other > chocolates. > > Then finally, there are the 2 old standbys, the traditional blends. > > Gourmet Bittersweet is a chocolate that, if you've read the NG in the past, > you already know my opinions on. Quite simply, the best chocolate in the > world. Need I say more? > > French Vanilla is also very, very good. No, it doesn't have the power of > Gourmet bittersweet but it's a nice exercise in subtlety. The flavour has > an earthy, molasses cast to it, especially appropriate for chocolate mixed > with cinnamon and other such spices. > > There's the rundown, at least for the dark chocolates. If you'd like my > opinion on the milks, as well, let me know. > > > -- > Alex Rast Alex, Thanks for your opinions. I suspect I'll try them all. On a completely different note: I was in Milan in October, and intended to bring back some chocolate. I tried 3 stores, and the only Italian producer I could find was Venchi! I asked for Amedei, even spelling it to compensate for my execrable Italian, and one shopkeeper acted like he never heard of it! I found Valhrona, ironically, but not Domori. What gives? Are these producers that esoteric? Regards, Dean |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Alex Rast" > wrote in message ... > at Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:08:51 GMT in <D0kvd.3231$Z%1.2159@trnddc03>, > (DPM) wrote : > > >I just received a block of this from Chocosphere. Very fruity, with a > >cherry/almond/hazelnut profile; delicious, but idiosyncratic. I'm > >wondering what the other couverture blocs are like. Has anyone tried the > >others? Alex, any opinions? > > Each of the varietals is different, distinctive, and generally IMHO sets > the reference standard for its varietal. > > The Colombian is unbelievable - an exploration of subtle, floral taste in a > chocolate, one of the great chocolates in the world and a perfect chocolate > to pair with rosewater. This is the chocolate to buy for Valentine's Day - > it's so seductive, anyone tasting it will swoon. > > Ecuador Nacional is powerful and bold. It's got all the Arriba signatures - > blackberry, tobacco, woody, with that bitter hint characteristic of Arriba. > It is excellent mixed with milk or cream - such as in a pudding or truffle. > > Madagascar Criollo is a study in complementary components. There's flavours > of blueberry, spices, and cocoa in there, a complexity remarkable for a > varietal. This is a superb chocolate for cakes, cookies, and other baked > goods. > > Then there's the Etienne blends. > > Coucher du Soleil is somewhat like Sur Del Lago, but less fruity. There's > an initial fruity hit, then it quickly becomes more of a cocoa/coffee > flavour. There is a sharp bitterness to the finish, a characteristic that > knocks it down a notch in my book. It's still quite good, though. > > L'Harmonie is the best of the blends. It's incredibly complex, reminding me > a lot of Valrhona's Gran Couva, with elements of just about every desirable > flavour component in it. However, this complexity is never jarring or > confusing. It makes for a superb, yet highly characterised, general-purpose > chocolate. > > Lever du Soleil maintains Guittard's excellence in the 60-65% class. This > one is very dark and clearly contains components of the Ecuador Nacional in > it - a strong chocolate at its percentage, and one where with the dark > roast it receives minimises the bitterness. > > La Nuit Noire, however, is a complete disappointment. It just tastes very > sugary, like candy. There might be hints of peach and strawberry in there, > but it's pretty faint. It's just not even in the same world as the other > chocolates. > > Then finally, there are the 2 old standbys, the traditional blends. > > Gourmet Bittersweet is a chocolate that, if you've read the NG in the past, > you already know my opinions on. Quite simply, the best chocolate in the > world. Need I say more? > > French Vanilla is also very, very good. No, it doesn't have the power of > Gourmet bittersweet but it's a nice exercise in subtlety. The flavour has > an earthy, molasses cast to it, especially appropriate for chocolate mixed > with cinnamon and other such spices. > > There's the rundown, at least for the dark chocolates. If you'd like my > opinion on the milks, as well, let me know. > > > -- > Alex Rast Alex, Thanks for your opinions. I suspect I'll try them all. On a completely different note: I was in Milan in October, and intended to bring back some chocolate. I tried 3 stores, and the only Italian producer I could find was Venchi! I asked for Amedei, even spelling it to compensate for my execrable Italian, and one shopkeeper acted like he never heard of it! I found Valhrona, ironically, but not Domori. What gives? Are these producers that esoteric? Regards, Dean |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
at Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:53:19 GMT in <3_Zvd.12990$pZ5.12774@trndny06>,
(DPM) wrote : > >"Alex Rast" > wrote in message .. . >> at Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:08:51 GMT in <D0kvd.3231$Z%1.2159@trnddc03>, >> (DPM) wrote : >> >> >I just received a block of this from Chocosphere. Very fruity, with >> >a cherry/almond/hazelnut profile; delicious, but idiosyncratic. I'm >> >wondering what the other couverture blocs are like. Has anyone tried >> >the others? Alex, any opinions? >> >> Each of the varietals is different, distinctive, and generally IMHO >> sets the reference standard for its varietal. .... >> >> There's the rundown, at least for the dark chocolates. If you'd like >> my opinion on the milks, as well, let me know. >> >> >> -- >> Alex Rast > >Alex, > >Thanks for your opinions. I suspect I'll try them all. > >On a completely different note: I was in Milan in October, and intended >to bring back some chocolate. I tried 3 stores, and the only Italian >producer I could find was Venchi! I asked for Amedei, even spelling it >to compensate for my execrable Italian, and one shopkeeper acted like he >never heard of it! I found Valhrona, ironically, but not Domori. What >gives? Are these producers that esoteric? > No, and thus I suspect you were going to the wrong stores. If a shopkeeper hadn't heard of it, this means most likely he isn't a chocolate connoisseur. However, even in Italy, distribution is thin. Keep in mind that these are smaller, artisanal companies - they're not going to be found on every street corner. The situation is really no different than it is in the U.S. - that is, you have to do an actual search to find the stores that stock it. -- Alex Rast (remove d., .7, not, and .NOSPAM to reply) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
at Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:53:19 GMT in <3_Zvd.12990$pZ5.12774@trndny06>,
(DPM) wrote : > >"Alex Rast" > wrote in message .. . >> at Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:08:51 GMT in <D0kvd.3231$Z%1.2159@trnddc03>, >> (DPM) wrote : >> >> >I just received a block of this from Chocosphere. Very fruity, with >> >a cherry/almond/hazelnut profile; delicious, but idiosyncratic. I'm >> >wondering what the other couverture blocs are like. Has anyone tried >> >the others? Alex, any opinions? >> >> Each of the varietals is different, distinctive, and generally IMHO >> sets the reference standard for its varietal. .... >> >> There's the rundown, at least for the dark chocolates. If you'd like >> my opinion on the milks, as well, let me know. >> >> >> -- >> Alex Rast > >Alex, > >Thanks for your opinions. I suspect I'll try them all. > >On a completely different note: I was in Milan in October, and intended >to bring back some chocolate. I tried 3 stores, and the only Italian >producer I could find was Venchi! I asked for Amedei, even spelling it >to compensate for my execrable Italian, and one shopkeeper acted like he >never heard of it! I found Valhrona, ironically, but not Domori. What >gives? Are these producers that esoteric? > No, and thus I suspect you were going to the wrong stores. If a shopkeeper hadn't heard of it, this means most likely he isn't a chocolate connoisseur. However, even in Italy, distribution is thin. Keep in mind that these are smaller, artisanal companies - they're not going to be found on every street corner. The situation is really no different than it is in the U.S. - that is, you have to do an actual search to find the stores that stock it. -- Alex Rast (remove d., .7, not, and .NOSPAM to reply) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
TN: 2001 Lago di Corbara | Wine | |||
Guittard gourmet bittersweet | Chocolate |