Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Chocolate (rec.food.chocolate) all topics related to eating and making chocolate such as cooking techniques, recipes, history, folklore & source recommendations. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What brand of 70% bittersweet (dark) chocolate would make a good
truffle/ganache/chocolate sauce? I have tried Scharffenberger, but am looking for a less fruitty chocolate, not more than $11 a pound. I have tried Callebout also, but am looking for something new. Thanks. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
at Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:22:49 GMT in >,
deedoveyatshenteldotnet (Dee Randall) wrote : >What brand of 70% bittersweet (dark) chocolate would make a good >truffle/ganache/chocolate sauce? > >I have tried Scharffenberger, but am looking for a less fruitty >chocolate, not more than $11 a pound. Almost any chocolate will be less fruity than Scharffen Berger, but FWIW I agree that, in general, a fruity chocolate doesn't make for the best truffles, or sauce, for that matter. Actually, you want something a little different for truffles and for sauce. In the truffle range, you can get by with a more nuanced, mild flavour, because there's much more chocolate in the mix. With sauces, OTOH, you want a powerful flavour because the higher dilution means you need the strength to make the chocolate flavour stand out. With sauce, however, you can also get by with a lower cocoa butter content, because you've got so much more fluid, generally at a lower fat content anyway, to smooth out the mixture. For low fruitiness, you want a darker roast. Now, if a roast is *very* dark, it can make truffles seem a little "flat", but definitely you want the roast to be darker than the (underroasted?) Scharffen Berger. The $11/lb restriction makes your choices *very* limited. Most of the better chocolates are more than that, even if only a little bit more. At the $11/lb price, you're more or less limiting yourself to domestic producers. And that pretty much means you're limiting yourself to Guittard and Ghirardelli, if you want quality chocolate. Guittard is superb overall - IMHO far better than Scharffen Berger, but their best chocolates come in the 60-65% class. Ghirardelli doesn't list their cocoa solids percentage. The Bittersweet chocolate they produce is very good, but so nearly identical to Callebaut that it's hard to tell them apart. So if you really do want to stay under $11/lb, for truffles, yet want a different flavour, perhaps the only option you have left is Guittard Coucher du Soleil 72%. Be aware that there's still some fruitiness to it. If you can accept a loss of actual cocoa solids percentage, then an outstanding choice is Guittard Gourmet Bittersweet. It's 63% cocoa solids, but possesses an unusual intensity for that percentage that really makes it a lot stronger than typical chocolates in its range. I use it as my "standard" ganache chocolate - it's incredibly versatile, being excellent across the entire range from truffles to sauce. For sauce only, you have another good choice : El Rey Gran Saman. This has a low cocoa butter content, and for that reason isn't the best for truffles, but for sauce it has knockout power and a great, tropical/earthy flavour. Now, if you want to expand your horizons into the $20/lb range, your options open up immensely. Michel Cluizel, perhaps the best single chocolatier in the world (at least IMHO) has a world-class entry in Amer Brut 72%. Cote D'Or and Dolfin each make chocolates that are almost as good, although with the Cluizel available for a lower price thanks to the fact that you can get it in a bulk format as opposed to the other 2, only found in bars, it sort of begs the question as to why. Valrhona's Araguani is good for truffles, with a delicate flavour, not so fruity as the typical Valrhona either. I wouldn't recommend this one for sauce, though. There are other chocolates that offer various balances of flavour and roast , if you're ready to spend the big bucks, but of course prices quickly get out of hand and I'm with you - when it comes to truffles and sauces, *some* cost control is desirable, especially when the extra price doesn't really buy you better quality, just different, generally more characterised, flavour characteristics. -- Alex Rast (remove d., .7, not, and .NOSPAM to reply) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
at Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:22:49 GMT in >,
deedoveyatshenteldotnet (Dee Randall) wrote : >What brand of 70% bittersweet (dark) chocolate would make a good >truffle/ganache/chocolate sauce? > >I have tried Scharffenberger, but am looking for a less fruitty >chocolate, not more than $11 a pound. Almost any chocolate will be less fruity than Scharffen Berger, but FWIW I agree that, in general, a fruity chocolate doesn't make for the best truffles, or sauce, for that matter. Actually, you want something a little different for truffles and for sauce. In the truffle range, you can get by with a more nuanced, mild flavour, because there's much more chocolate in the mix. With sauces, OTOH, you want a powerful flavour because the higher dilution means you need the strength to make the chocolate flavour stand out. With sauce, however, you can also get by with a lower cocoa butter content, because you've got so much more fluid, generally at a lower fat content anyway, to smooth out the mixture. For low fruitiness, you want a darker roast. Now, if a roast is *very* dark, it can make truffles seem a little "flat", but definitely you want the roast to be darker than the (underroasted?) Scharffen Berger. The $11/lb restriction makes your choices *very* limited. Most of the better chocolates are more than that, even if only a little bit more. At the $11/lb price, you're more or less limiting yourself to domestic producers. And that pretty much means you're limiting yourself to Guittard and Ghirardelli, if you want quality chocolate. Guittard is superb overall - IMHO far better than Scharffen Berger, but their best chocolates come in the 60-65% class. Ghirardelli doesn't list their cocoa solids percentage. The Bittersweet chocolate they produce is very good, but so nearly identical to Callebaut that it's hard to tell them apart. So if you really do want to stay under $11/lb, for truffles, yet want a different flavour, perhaps the only option you have left is Guittard Coucher du Soleil 72%. Be aware that there's still some fruitiness to it. If you can accept a loss of actual cocoa solids percentage, then an outstanding choice is Guittard Gourmet Bittersweet. It's 63% cocoa solids, but possesses an unusual intensity for that percentage that really makes it a lot stronger than typical chocolates in its range. I use it as my "standard" ganache chocolate - it's incredibly versatile, being excellent across the entire range from truffles to sauce. For sauce only, you have another good choice : El Rey Gran Saman. This has a low cocoa butter content, and for that reason isn't the best for truffles, but for sauce it has knockout power and a great, tropical/earthy flavour. Now, if you want to expand your horizons into the $20/lb range, your options open up immensely. Michel Cluizel, perhaps the best single chocolatier in the world (at least IMHO) has a world-class entry in Amer Brut 72%. Cote D'Or and Dolfin each make chocolates that are almost as good, although with the Cluizel available for a lower price thanks to the fact that you can get it in a bulk format as opposed to the other 2, only found in bars, it sort of begs the question as to why. Valrhona's Araguani is good for truffles, with a delicate flavour, not so fruity as the typical Valrhona either. I wouldn't recommend this one for sauce, though. There are other chocolates that offer various balances of flavour and roast , if you're ready to spend the big bucks, but of course prices quickly get out of hand and I'm with you - when it comes to truffles and sauces, *some* cost control is desirable, especially when the extra price doesn't really buy you better quality, just different, generally more characterised, flavour characteristics. -- Alex Rast (remove d., .7, not, and .NOSPAM to reply) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dee Randall" <deedoveyatshenteldotnet> wrote in message ... > What brand of 70% bittersweet (dark) chocolate would make a good > truffle/ganache/chocolate sauce? > > I have tried Scharffenberger, but am looking for a less fruitty chocolate, > not more than $11 a pound. I have tried Callebout also, but am looking > for something new. > > Thanks. Try El Rey Gran Saman. It has a strong, earthy flavor. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dee Randall" <deedoveyatshenteldotnet> wrote in message ... > What brand of 70% bittersweet (dark) chocolate would make a good > truffle/ganache/chocolate sauce? > > I have tried Scharffenberger, but am looking for a less fruitty chocolate, > not more than $11 a pound. I have tried Callebout also, but am looking > for something new. > > Thanks. Try El Rey Gran Saman. It has a strong, earthy flavor. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for your answer. It is more than I ever expected.
My appreciation. Dee "Alex Rast" > wrote in message ... > at Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:22:49 GMT in >, > deedoveyatshenteldotnet (Dee Randall) wrote : > >>What brand of 70% bittersweet (dark) chocolate would make a good >>truffle/ganache/chocolate sauce? >> >>I have tried Scharffenberger, but am looking for a less fruitty >>chocolate, not more than $11 a pound. > > Almost any chocolate will be less fruity than Scharffen Berger, but FWIW I > agree that, in general, a fruity chocolate doesn't make for the best > truffles, or sauce, for that matter. Actually, you want something a little > different for truffles and for sauce. In the truffle range, you can get by > with a more nuanced, mild flavour, because there's much more chocolate in > the mix. With sauces, OTOH, you want a powerful flavour because the higher > dilution means you need the strength to make the chocolate flavour stand > out. With sauce, however, you can also get by with a lower cocoa butter > content, because you've got so much more fluid, generally at a lower fat > content anyway, to smooth out the mixture. > > For low fruitiness, you want a darker roast. Now, if a roast is *very* > dark, it can make truffles seem a little "flat", but definitely you want > the roast to be darker than the (underroasted?) Scharffen Berger. > > The $11/lb restriction makes your choices *very* limited. Most of the > better chocolates are more than that, even if only a little bit more. > At the $11/lb price, you're more or less limiting yourself to domestic > producers. And that pretty much means you're limiting yourself to Guittard > and Ghirardelli, if you want quality chocolate. Guittard is superb overall > - IMHO far better than Scharffen Berger, but their best chocolates come in > the 60-65% class. Ghirardelli doesn't list their cocoa solids percentage. > The Bittersweet chocolate they produce is very good, but so nearly > identical to Callebaut that it's hard to tell them apart. So if you really > do want to stay under $11/lb, for truffles, yet want a different flavour, > perhaps the only option you have left is Guittard Coucher du Soleil 72%. > Be > aware that there's still some fruitiness to it. > > If you can accept a loss of actual cocoa solids percentage, then an > outstanding choice is Guittard Gourmet Bittersweet. It's 63% cocoa solids, > but possesses an unusual intensity for that percentage that really makes > it > a lot stronger than typical chocolates in its range. I use it as my > "standard" ganache chocolate - it's incredibly versatile, being excellent > across the entire range from truffles to sauce. > > For sauce only, you have another good choice : El Rey Gran Saman. This has > a low cocoa butter content, and for that reason isn't the best for > truffles, but for sauce it has knockout power and a great, tropical/earthy > flavour. > > Now, if you want to expand your horizons into the $20/lb range, your > options open up immensely. Michel Cluizel, perhaps the best single > chocolatier in the world (at least IMHO) has a world-class entry in Amer > Brut 72%. Cote D'Or and Dolfin each make chocolates that are almost as > good, although with the Cluizel available for a lower price thanks to the > fact that you can get it in a bulk format as opposed to the other 2, only > found in bars, it sort of begs the question as to why. Valrhona's Araguani > is good for truffles, with a delicate flavour, not so fruity as the > typical > Valrhona either. I wouldn't recommend this one for sauce, though. > > There are other chocolates that offer various balances of flavour and > roast > , if you're ready to spend the big bucks, but of course prices quickly get > out of hand and I'm with you - when it comes to truffles and sauces, > *some* > cost control is desirable, especially when the extra price doesn't really > buy you better quality, just different, generally more characterised, > flavour characteristics. > > -- > Alex Rast > > (remove d., .7, not, and .NOSPAM to reply) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for your answer. It is more than I ever expected.
My appreciation. Dee "Alex Rast" > wrote in message ... > at Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:22:49 GMT in >, > deedoveyatshenteldotnet (Dee Randall) wrote : > >>What brand of 70% bittersweet (dark) chocolate would make a good >>truffle/ganache/chocolate sauce? >> >>I have tried Scharffenberger, but am looking for a less fruitty >>chocolate, not more than $11 a pound. > > Almost any chocolate will be less fruity than Scharffen Berger, but FWIW I > agree that, in general, a fruity chocolate doesn't make for the best > truffles, or sauce, for that matter. Actually, you want something a little > different for truffles and for sauce. In the truffle range, you can get by > with a more nuanced, mild flavour, because there's much more chocolate in > the mix. With sauces, OTOH, you want a powerful flavour because the higher > dilution means you need the strength to make the chocolate flavour stand > out. With sauce, however, you can also get by with a lower cocoa butter > content, because you've got so much more fluid, generally at a lower fat > content anyway, to smooth out the mixture. > > For low fruitiness, you want a darker roast. Now, if a roast is *very* > dark, it can make truffles seem a little "flat", but definitely you want > the roast to be darker than the (underroasted?) Scharffen Berger. > > The $11/lb restriction makes your choices *very* limited. Most of the > better chocolates are more than that, even if only a little bit more. > At the $11/lb price, you're more or less limiting yourself to domestic > producers. And that pretty much means you're limiting yourself to Guittard > and Ghirardelli, if you want quality chocolate. Guittard is superb overall > - IMHO far better than Scharffen Berger, but their best chocolates come in > the 60-65% class. Ghirardelli doesn't list their cocoa solids percentage. > The Bittersweet chocolate they produce is very good, but so nearly > identical to Callebaut that it's hard to tell them apart. So if you really > do want to stay under $11/lb, for truffles, yet want a different flavour, > perhaps the only option you have left is Guittard Coucher du Soleil 72%. > Be > aware that there's still some fruitiness to it. > > If you can accept a loss of actual cocoa solids percentage, then an > outstanding choice is Guittard Gourmet Bittersweet. It's 63% cocoa solids, > but possesses an unusual intensity for that percentage that really makes > it > a lot stronger than typical chocolates in its range. I use it as my > "standard" ganache chocolate - it's incredibly versatile, being excellent > across the entire range from truffles to sauce. > > For sauce only, you have another good choice : El Rey Gran Saman. This has > a low cocoa butter content, and for that reason isn't the best for > truffles, but for sauce it has knockout power and a great, tropical/earthy > flavour. > > Now, if you want to expand your horizons into the $20/lb range, your > options open up immensely. Michel Cluizel, perhaps the best single > chocolatier in the world (at least IMHO) has a world-class entry in Amer > Brut 72%. Cote D'Or and Dolfin each make chocolates that are almost as > good, although with the Cluizel available for a lower price thanks to the > fact that you can get it in a bulk format as opposed to the other 2, only > found in bars, it sort of begs the question as to why. Valrhona's Araguani > is good for truffles, with a delicate flavour, not so fruity as the > typical > Valrhona either. I wouldn't recommend this one for sauce, though. > > There are other chocolates that offer various balances of flavour and > roast > , if you're ready to spend the big bucks, but of course prices quickly get > out of hand and I'm with you - when it comes to truffles and sauces, > *some* > cost control is desirable, especially when the extra price doesn't really > buy you better quality, just different, generally more characterised, > flavour characteristics. > > -- > Alex Rast > > (remove d., .7, not, and .NOSPAM to reply) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone have a good recipe for truffles they'd like to share?
sb Alex Rast wrote: >at Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:22:49 GMT in >, >deedoveyatshenteldotnet (Dee Randall) wrote : > > > >>What brand of 70% bittersweet (dark) chocolate would make a good >>truffle/ganache/chocolate sauce? >> >>I have tried Scharffenberger, but am looking for a less fruitty >>chocolate, not more than $11 a pound. >> >> > >Almost any chocolate will be less fruity than Scharffen Berger, but FWIW I >agree that, in general, a fruity chocolate doesn't make for the best >truffles, or sauce, for that matter. Actually, you want something a little >different for truffles and for sauce. In the truffle range, you can get by >with a more nuanced, mild flavour, because there's much more chocolate in >the mix. With sauces, OTOH, you want a powerful flavour because the higher >dilution means you need the strength to make the chocolate flavour stand >out. With sauce, however, you can also get by with a lower cocoa butter >content, because you've got so much more fluid, generally at a lower fat >content anyway, to smooth out the mixture. > >For low fruitiness, you want a darker roast. Now, if a roast is *very* >dark, it can make truffles seem a little "flat", but definitely you want >the roast to be darker than the (underroasted?) Scharffen Berger. > >The $11/lb restriction makes your choices *very* limited. Most of the >better chocolates are more than that, even if only a little bit more. >At the $11/lb price, you're more or less limiting yourself to domestic >producers. And that pretty much means you're limiting yourself to Guittard >and Ghirardelli, if you want quality chocolate. Guittard is superb overall >- IMHO far better than Scharffen Berger, but their best chocolates come in >the 60-65% class. Ghirardelli doesn't list their cocoa solids percentage. >The Bittersweet chocolate they produce is very good, but so nearly >identical to Callebaut that it's hard to tell them apart. So if you really >do want to stay under $11/lb, for truffles, yet want a different flavour, >perhaps the only option you have left is Guittard Coucher du Soleil 72%. Be >aware that there's still some fruitiness to it. > >If you can accept a loss of actual cocoa solids percentage, then an >outstanding choice is Guittard Gourmet Bittersweet. It's 63% cocoa solids, >but possesses an unusual intensity for that percentage that really makes it >a lot stronger than typical chocolates in its range. I use it as my >"standard" ganache chocolate - it's incredibly versatile, being excellent >across the entire range from truffles to sauce. > >For sauce only, you have another good choice : El Rey Gran Saman. This has >a low cocoa butter content, and for that reason isn't the best for >truffles, but for sauce it has knockout power and a great, tropical/earthy >flavour. > >Now, if you want to expand your horizons into the $20/lb range, your >options open up immensely. Michel Cluizel, perhaps the best single >chocolatier in the world (at least IMHO) has a world-class entry in Amer >Brut 72%. Cote D'Or and Dolfin each make chocolates that are almost as >good, although with the Cluizel available for a lower price thanks to the >fact that you can get it in a bulk format as opposed to the other 2, only >found in bars, it sort of begs the question as to why. Valrhona's Araguani >is good for truffles, with a delicate flavour, not so fruity as the typical >Valrhona either. I wouldn't recommend this one for sauce, though. > >There are other chocolates that offer various balances of flavour and roast >, if you're ready to spend the big bucks, but of course prices quickly get >out of hand and I'm with you - when it comes to truffles and sauces, *some* >cost control is desirable, especially when the extra price doesn't really >buy you better quality, just different, generally more characterised, >flavour characteristics. > > > -- |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was reading through the responses and noticed that Alex mentioned
that most quality chocolates are above the $11/lb range. Where do you live? Here in Texas we have a store called Central Market and, at least right now, they have Callebaut semi-sweet and white for $6/lb and El Rey milk for $7.50/lb. The only one that is over is the extra dark Valhrona which is $14/lb. I thought these prices were really good, and luckily I have stocked up b/c I don't think it will last for long. SC |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Just made another mint chocolate ganache | General Cooking | |||
2015 Chocolate Ganache | General Cooking | |||
chocolate ganache | Baking | |||
Lemon Cream Chocolate Ganache Cake | Recipes (moderated) | |||
Ganache using 99% dark chocolate | Chocolate |