Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Chocolate (rec.food.chocolate) all topics related to eating and making chocolate such as cooking techniques, recipes, history, folklore & source recommendations. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Extending the question...are there any U.S. _growers_ of cocoa beans
other than the Original Hawaiian Chocolate Factory? My understanding is that the cacao tree can only grow within 20 degrees north or south of the equator, and the only U.S. soil that meets this requirement is Hawaii. Does that sound right? -Bruce |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(NM-Bruce) wrote:
> Extending the question...are there any U.S. _growers_ of cocoa beans > other than the Original Hawaiian Chocolate Factory? My understanding > is that the cacao tree can only grow within 20 degrees north or south > of the equator, and the only U.S. soil that meets this requirement is > Hawaii. Does that sound right? Hi Bruce, To my knowledge, OHCF are the only (commercial) US growers of cocoa beans. Well, them, and anybody else who's growing for them. I'm not sure what the exact requirements are for cacao to grow, or whether it could be grown indoors at other latitudes. I've had OHCF's chocolate - it's carried by some natural foods and gourmet type stores in Hawaii. ![]() Interestingly, the state politicians in Hawaii lobbied successfully a few years back to have Hawaiian-grown coffee served at White House functions instead of imported coffee (seems logical) but I haven't heard anything about doing the same for chocolate. I guess coffee is just a more developed industry; OHCF is really pioneering cacao as part of diversified agriculture in Hawaii. -Dan -- http://ChocoLocate.com/ - The Chocolate Lovers' Page, established 1994. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here are a few more that may qualify:
Dagoba (Oregon) Michael Recchiuti (San Francisco) De Bas (Fresno, CA) Jamieson's (Kentucky, but made in Ghana) Cowgirl Chocolates (Moscow, ID) Fran's Chocolates (Seattle) Endangered Species Chocolate Co. (Oregon) Of these, I believe a few like Dagoba and Recchiuti are almost certainly bean-to-bar chocolatiers (which is, I believe, what you truly mean by "American Chocolatiers"?). If anyone knows the original chocolate source for any of the above that aren't bean-to-bar, I'd be interested in that info. In my opinion, if American chocolate were judged worldwide by one brand, Guittard should be that one. They produce some of the finest chocolate in all the world. Geoff "Karstens Rage" > wrote in message ... > Ok so that makes 12 if I have this straight: > > 1. Scharffenberger > 2. Ghiradelli > 3. Guittard > 4. Merckens > 5. Van Leer > 6. Hershey's > 7. Peters > 8. Mars > 9. World's Finest > 10. Blommer > 11. Wilbur Chocolate > 12. The Original Hawaiin Chocolate Factory > > k > > Alex Rast wrote: >> at Sat, 12 Mar 2005 21:36:54 GMT in >, >> (Karstens Rage) wrote : >> >> >>>The woman on the ScharffenBerger tour said there were only 12 makers of >>>chocolate in the US, SharffenBerger being one. There are two others in >>>California, Ghiradelli and Guittard. I found through web searches that >>>there is Merckens, Van Leer, Hersheys, Peter's (a division of Nestle), >>>and maybe Lake Champlain? Are ther four more? If so can anyone tell me >>>who they are? >>> >>>k >> >> >> M&M/Mars (I'm suprised you didn't find/think of this one) >> World's Finest (remember them from school fundraisers?) >> Blommer >> Wilbur Chocolate >> >> And there's also : The Original Hawaiian Chocolate Factory, which I >> suspect Scharffen Berger might not have known about. >> >> Lake Champlain sources their chocolate from Callebaut. So they're not >> domestic. >> |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's some interesting info:
Wilbur and Peter's merged in '02 - Peter's became Nestle's Chocolate Company in 1951. Cargill owns Wilbur - which makes no dark chocolate. Jacques Torres is a bean-to-bar chocolatier in New York, but sells mostly chocolates and apparently does not target the dark-chocolate crowd. World's Finest is in Chicago and is bean-to-bar. Because their market is in fundraising, they sell no dark chocolate either. Blommer is bean-to-bar, based in Chicago and having 3 factories across the U.S. I think they sell only couverture to candymakers, so you can't buy their chocolate too easily. Original Hawaiian Chocolate Factory is in Kona and they do grow their own cacao trees - so I believe they are indeed the only commercial U.S. cacao tree grower. I am curious what their chocolate is like; if it is anything like the Hawaiian Host chocolate-covered macadamia nuts, forget it. I learned when living in Ghana that the chocolate sold in tropical locations is made so it won't melt in the heat...which means it won't melt in your mouth either. Jamieson's is an example - though a decent chocolate, theirs doesn't melt as easily (and is made in Ghana). Merckens and Van Leer are bean-to-bar but are also in the couverture business, not retail. Geoff |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Original Hawaiian Chocolate Factory is in Kona and they do grow their
own cacao trees - so I believe they are indeed the only commercial U.S. cacao tree grower. =A0I am curious what their chocolate is like;" I just bought some. To my palate (which is not necessarily the most sophisticated), it was very smooth and flavorful, with a good mouth feel, not at all waxy or abrasive -- but not distinct enough to justify the price I paid. Maybe professionals who buy large amounts could get it cheaper. As someone who buys only about 50 lbs of chocolate per year to produce chocolates and truffles, I can get prices in the $3 - $10 per pound range, depending on brand. For me to by Orig Hawaiian Vintage it would be over $20 per pound. Again, maybe if you're a bulk buyer there are better rates, but for the "really little guy" like me - not worth it. As an "eating chocolate" the 60% I tried was good, but nothing spectacular and surprisingly not very distinctive. Because of the underlying A'a and pahoehoe (types of lava rock), I guess I was expecting something more distinctive. Most of the El Rey, Valrhona, Scharffen Berger, Dagoba 'models' that I've tried have characteristic and distinctive notes (even if I don't personally care for some of those notes.) If someone gave me some more Hawaiian Vintage, I wouldn't kick it out of bed. And because I like the thought of supporting smaller businesses, I might buy some more just for eating. But I just think I can get as good or better flavor (for my personal tastes) for less money. Bruce |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I tried a couple of the Hawaiian chocolate bars in my tasting about 5
years ago. The "Vintage Kona Estate" (64%) did pretty well, coming in higher than Valrhona Caraibe and Callebaut 60%. Personally, I thought it was pretty good. It was a real pain getting it ordered, if I remember aright. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I tried a couple of the Hawaiian chocolate bars in my tasting about 5
years ago. The "Vintage Kona Estate" (64%) did pretty well, coming in higher than Valrhona Caraibe and Callebaut 60%. Personally, I thought it was pretty good. It was a real pain getting it ordered, if I remember aright. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
at Wed, 16 Mar 2005 01:43:47 GMT in >,
(Geoffrey Bard) wrote : >Here are a few more that may qualify: > >Dagoba (Oregon) Chocolate custom-made for them in Europe >Michael Recchiuti (San Francisco) Sources chocolate from various suppliers >De Bas (Fresno, CA) Buys from Callebaut >Jamieson's (Kentucky, but made in Ghana) Sold to Nestle >Cowgirl Chocolates (Moscow, ID) I have not heard of them. But probably they are like Fran's, below. >Fran's Chocolates (Seattle) Buys from Callebaut and El Rey >Endangered Species Chocolate Co. (Oregon) Custom made for them in Europe (Callebaut I think) > >Of these, I believe a few like Dagoba and Recchiuti are almost certainly >bean-to-bar chocolatiers (which is, I believe, what you truly mean by >"American Chocolatiers"?). Well, the Scharffen Berger blurb has to do with how many American chocolatiers actually have chocolate production facilities in the USA. It's worth noting that the situation isn't much different in Europe. Most chocolatiers buy from industrial sources. >>If anyone knows the original chocolate source for any of the above that >aren't bean-to-bar, I'd be interested in that info. > >In my opinion, if American chocolate were judged worldwide by one brand, >Guittard should be that one. They produce some of the finest chocolate >in all the world. IMHO way better than Scharffen Berger. I think it's perhaps more fair to say Guittard represents the very best of the American brands, in the same way that, at least IMHO, Cluizel represents the best of the French and Domori the best of the Italians. Meanwhile a more representatively "typical" U.S. brand should be IMHO Ghirardelli, while Callebaut would be "typical" of European brands. Both are IMHO about the same, quality-wise. Really I think, however, it's pretty misleading to think of any one manufacturer as typical of a nation. Each brand has its own style. -- Alex Rast (remove d., .7, not, and .NOSPAM to reply) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I believe they use Schokinag chocolate, so they aren't an American
bean-to-bar manufacturer. "Janet Puistonen" > wrote in message news:ckf_d.7628$qN3.1153@trndny01... > What about Christopher Norman? |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
True, but I was more speaking to a hypothetical question from the world,
"Who makes the best American chocolate?". That would obviously be Guittard. Scharffen Berger is quite good though. Geoff "Alex Rast" > wrote in message ... (snip) >>In my opinion, if American chocolate were judged worldwide by one brand, >>Guittard should be that one. They produce some of the finest chocolate >>in all the world. > > IMHO way better than Scharffen Berger. I think it's perhaps more fair to > say Guittard represents the very best of the American brands, in the same > way that, at least IMHO, Cluizel represents the best of the French and > Domori the best of the Italians. Meanwhile a more representatively > "typical" U.S. brand should be IMHO Ghirardelli, while Callebaut would be > "typical" of European brands. Both are IMHO about the same, quality-wise. > Really I think, however, it's pretty misleading to think of any one > manufacturer as typical of a nation. Each brand has its own style. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Alex Rast" > wrote in message
> IMHO way better than Scharffen Berger. I think it's perhaps more fair to > say Guittard represents the very best of the American brands, in the same > way that, at least IMHO, Cluizel represents the best of the French and > Domori the best of the Italians. Meanwhile a more representatively > "typical" U.S. brand should be IMHO Ghirardelli, while Callebaut would be > "typical" of European brands. Both are IMHO about the same, quality-wise. > Really I think, however, it's pretty misleading to think of any one > manufacturer as typical of a nation. Each brand has its own style. Alex, So you prefer Cluizel over Vahlrona, Bonnat, and Pralus. And Domori over Amedei? Mike |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Karstens Rage > wrote: > Ok so that makes 12 if I have this straight: > > 1. Scharffenberger > 2. Ghiradelli > 3. Guittard > 4. Merckens > 5. Van Leer > 6. Hershey's > 7. Peters > 8. Mars > 9. World's Finest > 10. Blommer > 11. Wilbur Chocolate > 12. The Original Hawaiin Chocolate Factory How about Jacques Torres? He manufactures his own now: <http://www.jacquestorres.com/hotpress.html> -- to respond (OT only), change "spamless.invalid" to "optonline.net" <http://www.thecoffeefaq.com/> |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
American beer and spirits: As puritanical rules retreat, the American market for beer and spirits is growing more competitive | General Cooking | |||
Developing an American Grand Cru from American Grapes | Wine | |||
Chocolate makers vs. chocolatiers | Chocolate | |||
Was That 300 Millionth American Really American? | General Cooking | |||
American sashimi | Sushi |