Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Chocolate (rec.food.chocolate) all topics related to eating and making chocolate such as cooking techniques, recipes, history, folklore & source recommendations. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Could someone point me to a source for judging/rating chocolate(s). I have
the generalities down -- but am looking for a quotable source. Thanks in Advance SGC |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
at Thu, 01 Apr 2004 12:24:15 GMT in >,
(SGC) wrote : >Could someone point me to a source for judging/rating chocolate(s). I have >the generalities down -- but am looking for a quotable source. > >Thanks in Advance >SGC > > My favourite, in terms of giving a realistic overview, is in Sandra Boynton's "Chocolate: The Consuming Passion" (ISBN 0-89480-199-6, Workman Publishing, 1982) "Evaluating Chocolate" - pp. 69-71. The book, btw, is a classic which any serious chocoholic should have. Lots of good facts presented in an humourous, tongue-in-cheek way. On-line, Domori's guide to tasting (found at http://www.domori.com) is nicely comprehensive. It isn't exactly a neutral source: Domori is a (superb) chocolate manufacturer, but it does have a pretty detailed explanation. Seventy Percent's system (http://www.seventypercent.com) is somewhat idiosyncratic, and IMHO doesn't put enough weight on the basic flavour of the chocolate, but it's semi-"objective" in the sense that it tries to come up with a numerical figure based on clearly established criteria. However, there is no standardised, uniform way to judge chocolate, at least not yet. I don't think, however, that a system can be that far away, given the emerging popularity of chocolate in a similar context to wine. I think the key ingredient that's needed to make it happen is some way to bring together major industry players and the serious, dedicated chocoholics round the world who regularly taste many chocolates. I envision some sort of association with regional sections, open to membership both by individuals and by organisations, which could coordinate and manage activities, chocolate tastings, etc. with people and companies spread over many countries. -- Alex Rast (remove d., .7, not, and .NOSPAM to reply) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 04-04-01 22:45:57, Alex Rast wrote:
> However, there is no standardised, uniform way to judge chocolate, at least > not yet. I don't think, however, that a system can be that far away, given > the emerging popularity of chocolate in a similar context to wine. .... And given that even with wine, 2 different tasters will use mostly disjunct adjectives to describe the taste and typically even disagree about where the wine originates from. ;-) Taste still doesn't seem up to be fitted in a standarized uniform system beyond the very basics. > the key ingredient that's needed to make it happen is some way to bring > together major industry players and the serious, dedicated chocoholics > round the world who regularly taste many chocolates. I'm all up for this heavy duty task! My compensation is even minimal! ;-) -- http://lars.marowsky-bree.de/disclaimer.html http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/wis.../ref=wl_em_to/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bread rating systems | Sourdough | |||
Judging water temp...thermometer? | Tea | |||
The Firmness Rating Scale | General Cooking | |||
BTU Rating of Burner | General Cooking | |||
contest judging? | General Cooking |