Stock pots
 

What would be the ideal pot for two people, an 8 or a 12 qt.

Thanks Dig
--
To reply, remove NOSPAM

Stock pots
 

On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 15:43:22 -0400, Dig >
wrote:

>What would be the ideal pot for two people, an 8 or a 12 qt.

I would go for twelve....you can prepare what you want for two...but,
you can't have ten over for chili.

Calphalon 8-quart (or bigger) stockpot, with lid. Simmer soup or cook
a big batch of tomato sauce in this sturdy, nonreactive stockpot. It
will do double-duty for boiling pasta and steaming vegetables, too.
www.calphalon.com

Stock pots
 

Dig wrote:
> What would be the ideal pot for two people, an 8 or a 12 qt.
>
> Thanks Dig

There are two of us. I have a 6, an 8 and a 10-quart. Just one
comment: I am short and cleaning the 10-quart at the sink gives me
handling problems, lifting it up and moving it back and forth and upside
down. I'd enlist my husband to scrub the 12-quart if we had one and he
often helps with the 10-quart.

Dora

Stock pots
 

In article >,
agrunspan > wrote:

> Dig wrote:
> > What would be the ideal pot for two people, an 8 or a 12 qt.
> >
> > Thanks Dig
>
> My opinion? You can always put less in a large pot -- but you can never
> put more in a small one. Won't you ever have company?
>
> If the price difference isn't obscene, I'd go for the 12.
>
> April G.
> San Antonio, TX

Thanks, I've decided to go with the 12 qt.

Dig.
--
To reply, remove NOSPAM

Stock pots
 

Dig > wrote:
>What would be the ideal pot for two people, an 8 or a 12 qt.

Goodness, you could never fit two people in a 12-quart pot!

Water weighs about 8 lbs/gallon, and so does "people". Assuming 240 lbs
of human, and about that much water, you'd need at least 60 gallons,
or 240 quarts. I'd say 300 quarts to be safe.

:)

Donald

Stock pots
 

Donald Tsang wrote:
> Dig > wrote:
>>What would be the ideal pot for two people, an 8 or a 12 qt.
>
> Goodness, you could never fit two people in a 12-quart pot!
>
> Water weighs about 8 lbs/gallon, and so does "people". Assuming 240 lbs
> of human, and about that much water, you'd need at least 60 gallons,
> or 240 quarts. I'd say 300 quarts to be safe.

Are any particular vegetables de rigueur?

How about wine? No, I mean in the pot.


--
Blinky RLU 297263
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project moved to this site August 28th:
http://improve-usenet.org

Stock pots
 

On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 10:45:26 -0700 (PDT),
(Donald Tsang) wrote:

> Donald

Donald...when you get to middle school, let us know.....maybe you can
post again. Until then...sit in the corner while I kill file you.

Stock pots
 

On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 14:23:58 -0400, Ward Abbott >
wrote:

>On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 10:45:26 -0700 (PDT),
>(Donald Tsang) wrote:
>
>> Donald
>
>Donald...when you get to middle school, let us know.....maybe you can
>post again. Until then...sit in the corner while I kill file you.

Here, Ward, take your chill pill. Then hone your irony detector.
Donald was just teasing about the OP's sentence structure, which
technically was ambiguous, and I a) understood he was joking and b)
thought his post was funny! If anyone needs to go to middle school,
seems like that person ought to be you, not Donald, who demonstrated
mastery of the English language in his post.

Stock pots
 

On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 18:54:18 GMT, KLS > wrote:


Why don't you and Donald sit quietly together and hold hands.....this
won't hurt.

Stock pots
 

On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:08:11 -0400, Ward Abbott >
wrote:

>On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 18:54:18 GMT, KLS > wrote:
>
>
>Why don't you and Donald sit quietly together and hold hands.....this
>won't hurt.

Only if you join us, love. Kumbaya!